Search

Create an account	Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10

	Mission Statement Modules · Home · Forum · LATEST COMMENTS · Special Sections · SUPPORT ZPEnergy · Advertising · AvantGo · Books · Downloads · Events · Feedback · Link to us · Private Messages · Search · Stories Archive · Submit News · Surveys · Top 10 · Topics · Web Links · Your Account Who's Online There are currently, 234 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online. You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here Events Hot Links Aetherometry American Antigravity Closeminded Science EarthTech ECW E-Cat World Innoplaza Integrity Research Institute New Energy Movement New Energy Times Panacea-BOCAF RexResearch Science Hobbyist T. Bearden Mirror Site USPTO Want to Know Other Info-Sources NE News Sites AER_Network E-Cat World NexusNewsfeed ZPE NE Discussion Groups Energetic Forum EMediaPress Energy Science Forum Free_Energy FB Group The KeelyNet Blog OverUnity Research Sarfatti_Physics Tesla Science Foundation (FB) Vortex (old Interact) Magazine Sites Electrifying Times (FB) ExtraOrdinary Technology IE Magazine New Energy Times Interesting Links		The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register Re: Phil's wackos (Score: 0) by Anonymous on Tuesday, September 09, 2003 @ 01:39:14 UTC TOTALLY WRONG, anonymous. I have had years of experience attempting to get people to look deeper into many subjects, and the first thing they throw back at you is your lack of STATUS. I mention those people, because anybody can easily and quickly see that: Either they are truly describing their experiences; Or - the US military and space programs are or were run by unreliable people. You choose. I do have such experiences but I cannot see any point in pushing that barrow on what's meant to be a ZPE discussion site. Really, what do you care what I have seen? When compared with the pilots I mentioned WHOM I KNOW personally, my stuff is too minor to consider, though important to me. The point is, there are over 450 military / government contractor / pilot witnesses in the Disclosure Project and plenty of them are as close to unimpeachable as you will get - such as Astronauts. It's time more people noticed that - the media will do you no good whatsoever. Lastly, my point about Phil Karn's attributed comments is that he is being unscientific by lumping together disparate things and then without any justification trying to relate them to some form of mental illness. I do not subscibe to the "alien abduction" scenario as presented - but I have seen UFO's (which is as broad as you want to make it but essentially some apparently controlled object that cannot be reconciled with known phenomena or human activity). The old argument that 80% of them are mistaken identification still leaves a very large hard core of what I call doozies; and this is where the testimony of Gordon Cooper et al will trump mine every time. Try explaining simultaneous ground radar / ground visual / airborne radar / airborne visual on the one event. Better yet, please explain the US Airforce's own release of the events of the night of October 7, 1965 at Edwards AFB. Me seeing lesser events is not worth debating. Cheers, Doug | Parent Re: Phil's wackos by Anonymous on Tuesday, September 09, 2003 @ 11:03:46 UTC Re: Phil's wackos by Rob on Tuesday, September 09, 2003 @ 15:52:33 UTC Re: Phil's wackos by Anonymous on Wednesday, September 10, 2003 @ 02:34:51 UTC Re: Phil's wackos by Anonymous on Friday, September 12, 2003 @ 00:07:59 UTC Re: Phil's wackos by Anonymous on Friday, September 12, 2003 @ 21:07:48 UTC Let's not get testy about UFOs by chipotle_pickle on Friday, September 12, 2003 @ 21:17:55 UTC

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice. Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.