Search

Create an account	Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10

	Mission Statement Modules · Home · Forum · LATEST COMMENTS · Special Sections · SUPPORT ZPEnergy · Advertising · AvantGo · Books · Downloads · Events · Feedback · Link to us · Private Messages · Search · Stories Archive · Submit News · Surveys · Top 10 · Topics · Web Links · Your Account Who's Online There are currently, 135 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online. You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here Events Hot Links Aetherometry American Antigravity Closeminded Science EarthTech ECW E-Cat World Innoplaza Integrity Research Institute New Energy Movement New Energy Times Panacea-BOCAF RexResearch Science Hobbyist T. Bearden Mirror Site USPTO Want to Know Other Info-Sources NE News Sites AER_Network E-Cat World NexusNewsfeed ZPE NE Discussion Groups Energetic Forum EMediaPress Energy Science Forum Free_Energy FB Group The KeelyNet Blog OverUnity Research Sarfatti_Physics Tesla Science Foundation (FB) Vortex (old Interact) Magazine Sites Electrifying Times (FB) ExtraOrdinary Technology IE Magazine New Energy Times Interesting Links		The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register Re: GLOBAL WARMING TIME BOMB TRAPPED IN ARCTIC SOIL: STUDY (Score: 1) by TechsArcana on Tuesday, August 26, 2008 @ 09:42:04 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) Looks like more scare-mongering to me.  Focus on the worst possible case in warming, imagine that the reaction runs to completion with an ever-renewing source of carbon, and then totally neglect any carbon squestering effects. from the link: > This is roughly equivalent of one sixth of the entire carbon content in the atmosphere. Currently there are 385 parts per million (ppm) of CO2 in Earth's atmosphere (.0003)  If ALL of the carbon in the artic soil were released, it would only add 64 ppm(.000064)  And there is no way that ALL of the carbon would be released.  This is hardly "unexpectedly huge stores of carbon dioxide" (unless your expectations were unrealistically small to begin with or your past models didn't account for this at all)  And once all the Carbon had been released, there wouldn't be any more, so it could not "fuel a vicious circle of global warming" at best, it would be a small extra blip. from the link: >The Nobel Prize-winning UN panel of climate change scientists [please don't get me started on the IGPCC] >project temperature increases by century's end of up to six >degrees Celsius (10.8 degrees Fahrenheit) in the Arctic region, Assuming this alarmist top-end prediction is accurate, (I don't think it will be,) it means that for most of the winter the ground is still going to frozen.  There will be only a few weeks of extra biological activity. and this story also totally neglects the added carbon sequestation due to increased plant growth (trees and other plants will be able to grow for longer at higher latitude, and thus store more carbon than is likely to be released from decay processes.) >which is more sensitive to global warming than any other part of the planet. Which is why even if the worst possible case of warming (from whatever initial cause) occurs, it will not be world-ending cataclysm that most people seem to think.  Most of the warming will occur at night, during the winter, in the high latitudes, and will be most welcome to the humans and animals living there. Main Greenland ice sheet is growing.  Antartic ice sheet is growing (expect for the western Antartic penninsula.  There is 30% more ice this year in the Artic ocean than last year. Solar cycle 24 has been delayed, and we are probably going to have several years (if not decades assuming the cycle goes through its typical minima) of global cooling.  We will be darn lucky if we don't suffer another "little ice age" Which is why we are not hearing about "global warming" anymore, but "climate change" so they can cover their bets and blame whatever happens on human activity. | Parent Re: GLOBAL WARMING TIME BOMB TRAPPED IN ARCTIC SOIL: STUDY by malc on Wednesday, August 27, 2008 @ 00:34:06 UTC Re: GLOBAL WARMING TIME BOMB TRAPPED IN ARCTIC SOIL: STUDY by TechsArcana on Wednesday, August 27, 2008 @ 04:15:27 UTC

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice. Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.