Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

· Home
· Forum
· Special Sections
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 97 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here


Hot Links

American Antigravity

Chava Energy

Closeminded Science


Energy Science



Integrity Research Institute

Interstellar Technologies

JLN Labs


New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

The Orion Proj.




Science Hobbyist

Tom Bearden's Page

Unlimited electric energy


Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
Alternative Energy News
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
Magazine Sites
Distributed Energy
Electrifying Times
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: Blinded; wearing Random Optics are you? (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Tuesday, July 22, 2003 @ 18:05:30 EDT
I agree with you and some previous postings. I think that GWE and WEM and all the people that pickle is attacking are just watching him dig a deep hole for himself.

I don't understand why Vlad has this guy posting his insulting comments.


| Parent

intersection of kooks and paid shills might be nill (Score: 1)
by chipotle_pickle on Tuesday, July 22, 2003 @ 18:45:31 EDT
(User Info | Send a Message) http://freehydrogen.blogspot.com
Since this whole thread is anonymous except for me, I can't tell who is responsible for what, so I can't tell what I've said about "you" before. But I suggest that some people are kooks or shills, never kooks and shills.

You said it brother about the Fed's crazy energy boondogles. Hot fusion research is the tip of the iceburg. I have a post on that in the current poll. why not go comment on that there and tell me if I've left something out.

Now here is where I disagree with you:

But all I am saying is that GWE might be legit and it might not be. Yes, some of the things you have pointed out ARE INDEED CURIOUS about the company and I also want them to answer many questions directly.

But I am NOT about to call them a scam when there is no proof of it. I am hoping for the best and honestly don't know what will happen.

I have not invested in their company and unless the company agreed for someone to see a working prototype I would not encourage anyone to invest in them. Not because I think they are a scam, but because there would not be enough information.

I really think that some people just like to lash out and attack because they have been burned so many times before by con artists and scams. You can be burned even if you never gave money.

GWE might indeed burn us. Does that sound like someone working for GWE?

No it doesn't even sound like a kook. But can I ask if you have read:

Starting a year ago, a few hundred families in the greater NJ area already have given money for this project, under the name of UFCT, based on a demo that was either
1 - faked
2 - should have been replicated independently by now

Now GWE deinies there are any investors, but refuses to specifically address the question of UFCT. Why's that? In fact, they refuse to specifically address any questions at all, that's their "policy": http://www.genesisworldenergy.com/gwe_policies.htm
Why's that? When those investors come over here and see a bunch of posts from ACs claiming that it's not yet proven that they've been scammed, or, truly kooky, that Lichtenstein's some sort of paid disinfo agent or blackmailer, that postpones their inevatable call to their AGs. Wait long enough and their money will be all gone.

I ask that people take a reasonable effort to revue the proof I offer before claiming that it's not a proven scam. If you don't follow my argument, then I didn't make it well and that's my fault. But if you don't read it it's irresponsible to claim that the proof's not in.

And about those anonymous boobs who claim that I don't answer questions or evade my mistakes or am on the take, or whatever, I say it's supremely hypocritical for anyone (Rob) to watch quietly while unfounded allegations are made against a named individual and then complain when the named individual calls the boobs for what they are. I'm glad that when I was counting the 2 people who I think will have the strength to learn from their mistakes with GWE, Rob wasn't one.

| Parent


All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.