 |
There are currently, 543 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
| |
| |
No-Lenz-law circuit for motors...
Posted on Thursday, October 23, 2003 @ 08:28:26 UTC by rob
|
|
From Intalek list:
Hi All,
I just verified the Anti-lenz law pulse motor circuit from
Garry Stanley.
It works great !
Please have a look here at this principle diagram:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/free-energy/files/anti-lenz/stanley_anti_lenz.gif
Discussion can be found here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/free-energy/messages
Now there are endless possibilities to build an overunity pulse motor
where the mechanical output just only depends on the strength of the magnets and
the coil parameters.
Regards, Stefan Hartmann.
----
Dipl. Ing. Stefan Hartmann
email: harti@h...
Note: I'm not sure, but it might be a problem viewing the image file if you're not a member of the free-energy list.
/rob
|
| |
|
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
| |
|
|
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register |
|
Re: No-Lenz-law circuit for motors... (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Thursday, October 23, 2003 @ 10:29:01 UTC | Rob, allow me to remove all doubt and state:
You Must Register as a Member on the Free-Energy List to View ANY Messages and/or Pictures....
...and also submit to the inevitable flood of spam that is associated with any Yahoo membership.
Perhaps someone can spare us all the pain and post a link to where one could directly obtain the image mentioned? |
Re: No-Lenz-law circuit for motors... (Score: 1)
by Bjoern on Thursday, October 23, 2003 @ 14:01:21 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) | Sorry, but I dont think there is a way to link into the Yahoo files without membership and passwords, but I will try to explain what is in there.
The link refers to a hand written document:
Theere is a drawing showing of two air wound coils wired in parallell.
The two coils are identical but one is turned 180 degrees ???.
There is a gap between the coils where a magnet is supposed to run.
About like this:
N (left coil) S N (magnet) S N (right coil) S. Where N, S stands for North, South.
N-ends wired together and S-ends wired together. Magnet is supposed to run into register of the coils.
The text is as follows:
"Anti-Lenz law pulse motor from Garry Stanley.
Verified by Stefan Hartmann on the 21st Oktober 2003.
-
Magnet is sucked into the airgap, when power is supplied at the shown position. When magnet is inside airgap, the power to the coils is shut off.
The magnet can then move freely on. The induction of current into the coils is cancelled, due to the wireing this way! Thus no Lenz law drag back!
This opens up the possibility to build huge overunity pulse motors!
P.S. The coils are 2 same coils, wound the same way, just the right coil is rotated by 180 degrees."
Thats it.
There are hundreds of discussion letters about this concept in the Yahoo group.
It takes a lot of time to follow up all arguments due to the Yahoo system and commercials.
There is almost 3000 messages in this group.
Maybe Lenz can be lurked this way.
No iron eddy currents losses or hysteresis losses.
What about I2R losses when there is no iron core?
Is it possible to create a B field enough without iron? There are a lot of questions showing up.
As always: no pain, no gain. Where is the pain?
Regards, Bjoern |
]
]
Re: No-Lenz-law circuit for motors... (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Thursday, October 23, 2003 @ 15:42:10 UTC | | Thank you, Rob. I appreciate your help. I'll review the diagram. |
]
|
|
Wrong wiring? (Score: 1)
by vlad on Saturday, October 25, 2003 @ 01:58:46 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com | Hi Garry,
the picture you uploaded to your website
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/free-energy/files/anti-lenz/stanleycoil1.gif
to my knowledge has a wrong wiring, as the green line is connecting both the middle points..
It must be this way:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/free-energy/files/anti- lenz/stanley_anti_lenz.gif
cause otherwise then the right coil will repell the magnet and not attract it into the airgap !
Overunity2001 |
Re: Wrong wiring? (Score: 1)
by Bjoern on Saturday, October 25, 2003 @ 03:38:40 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) | Dear friends
Please correct me if I am wrong, but I cant see the purpose in this.
When the coils are under current as the magnet is pulled into the field, caused by the coils, a counter field is set up as always (due to Lenz law).
Of course there is no drag back when the circuit is open and the rotor can coast on without Lenz force.
But when air wound coils are used the EMF power wont be impressing high, related to the current applied. An iron core would give something for nothing, and the EMF power would be many times higher for the same current.
So why waisting power in magnetising air wound coils ?
How can overunity appear in this case, and where does the extra energy that causes this OU come from ?
The wiring of the coils is not essential, if they are wired this or that as long as they cause a pull when power is connected.
I would prefer they were wired in series, due to less loss in the FET transistor, and the current would be the same in both coils.
I am sure this motor will work, but the efficiency would be low.
I would appreciate if someone would explain the meaning with this.
Regards, Bjoern
|
]
|
|
Re: No-Lenz-law circuit for motors... (Score: 1)
by Bjoern on Monday, October 27, 2003 @ 16:08:29 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) | Dear Stefan, and others.
Wheather the Trinity is an anti-Lenz or not I cant really say because I really dont undrestand what this anti-Lenz is all about. As I wrote in my former reply, this issue. Noone seemed to have the answers of my questions.
But I have another question. Why are there always more than one battery bank when one wants to catch free energy? wouldn't it be as easy to feed the extra energy back into the source battery?
Let be, it could be made with the double amperehours and reach long eitherway?
As for example in a car, that has just one battery, there are loads as lamps, fans, pumps and so on.
Besides the generator delivers power to the battery.
It works very well.
If we developes this a little further we could easily see that if we gets more power out from a motor-generator than we put in it would be self sustained.
So why complicate it with dual batteries, and switch on demand?
Regards, Bjoern |
]
|
|
|
|
