ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 200 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

Hydrino vs Casimir cavity based patents
Posted on Sunday, February 07, 2010 @ 11:48:57 UTC by vlad

Devices Hydrino patent based on catalyst denied while later patent for relativistic hydrogen based on Casimir cavity granted

by froarty/Scienceblog.com

This is a followup to previou article Will 2010 be the year of Zero Point Energy? It focuses on the perceived differences between hydrinos and fractional hydrogen and proposes that the two are equivalent. Our conclusion is that catalytic action is based on changes in Casimir force which requires a relativistic interpretation.

The "hydrino" appears to violate the minimum ground state for a nonrelativistic atom because our understanding of catalytic action is incomplete...


When Naudts proposed a relativistic solution which was proved by Bourgoin in 2006, it was embraced by Mills but he had no reason to update his papers or theory, The fault was not with his work. The fault is with our limited understanding of catalytic action. The math and metrics for catalysts puts everything in terms of energy and surface area which hides the relativistic nature of the effect. The US patent office denied Mills a patent based on his description using catalytic action and energy to describe “fractional states” but then turned around in May 2008 and granted a patent based on the same relative concept to Haisch and Moddel because they called it a Casimir cavity and used Lorentzian concepts to describe the same fractional states. relativistic hydrogen was recognized couched in these terms but denied when described in catalytic terms...

Read whole article: Hydrino vs Casimir cavity based patents

 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Devices
· News by vlad


Most read story about Devices:
Overunity magnet motor released !


Article Rating
Average Score: 5
Votes: 1


Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"Hydrino vs Casimir cavity based patents" | Login/Create an Account | 2 comments | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: Hydrino vs Casimir cavity based patents (Score: 1)
by dobermanmacleod on Sunday, February 07, 2010 @ 21:58:02 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)
In the Defense Intelligence Agency's report DIA-08-0911-003 (http://hhoinfo.ning.com/forum/topics/us-defense-intelligence-agency) "Technological Forecast: Worldwide Research on Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions Increasing and Gaining Acceptance:"

"U.S. LENR researchers also have reported results that support the phenomena of anomalous heat, nuclear particle production, and transmutation."

To my knowledge, neither "hydrinos" nor "fractional hydrogen" can account for nuclear particle production and transmutation.  Instead, "some scientists now believe quantum-level nuclear reactions may be occurring."

I am currently leaning toward the theory that "these nuclear reactions may be small-scale deuterium fusion occurring in a palladium metal lattice" (i.e. a Casimer cavity).



Re: Hydrino vs Casimir cavity based patents (Score: 1)
by Fran (froarty572@comcast.net) on Sunday, July 25, 2010 @ 07:25:04 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.byzipp.com/animaTime.htm
broken links in article:
Will 2010 be the Year of Zero Point Energy? [froarty.scienceblog.com] 

Hyrino vs Casimir cavity based patents
[froarty.scienceblog.com]

Fran



 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.