 |
There are currently, 431 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
| |
| |
Claims of Electromechanical Free Energy Invention
Posted on Tuesday, May 16, 2006 @ 17:43:51 UTC by vlad
|
|
Anonymous writes: From KeelyNet news; 05/16/06 - Claims of Free Energy deal
(Courtesy
Dan York...this one reeks to high heaven of a Dennis Lee type
membership with promises setup...CAVEAT EMPTOR and a huge block of
salt. - JWD) Revolutionarily new and dynamic ENERGY - FUEL - A New
Science Technology for ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION and ELECTRIC AUTO
ENGINES.
Inventor Donatelli's description of his invention
The
GIFT and every Power Plant Dante owns, the other nine, uses an
“ELECTROMECHANICAL” systems of operations. No one in the history of
science and the world has ever used this combination of energies
before. Electrical energy – converted to mechanical energy – then used
to develop free mechanical energy – then both added up, the converted
mechanical energy and the developed free mechanical energies - and this
total transmitted and converted to more electrical than is being used
when system is operating.
The 2080 MW "DYNALEVER" Power Plant is 885
feet long & 285 feet wide, and in comparison, sits on acreage only
1/800th as large as large as that the Hoover Dam/Lake Mead Power Plant
uses, and although it generates over 3000 MW of electricity, 1000 MW
being used for the Power Plants operation, delivers the same 2080
million watts electricity per second as the Hoover Dam. The Power Plant
uses over 32 million pounds of solid matter in motion, by way of 16
pods, with 8 - 1/2 cylinders in each pod, using 500,000 pounds of solid
matter each, and with 16 massive, 60 foot, 100 ton flywheels, cranking
out over 3 million horsepower operating 32 specially constructed
Electrical Generators, as 1 million HP is used to generate electricity
for the operations of the entire Power Plant, 2 million to generate
electricity for sale.
THE REMARKABLE THING THAT SCIENCE MISSED, ONCE THE “FUEL” IS
PLACED IN MOTION, IT TAKES VERY LITTLE TO KEEP IN MOTION, BY WAY OF
ENERGY, AND THIS IS A PHENOMENON OF NATURE...still no details but
sounds like Bessler or some kind of swinging pendulum/seesaw with
rotary flywheels effect. Why do these types always make OUTRAGEOUS
POWER CLAIMS but no one can do Hal Puthoffs' 1 WATT Challenge on a
small scale? No, it has to be millions of dollars and massive
equipment/investment as their proofs? And nothing for the
contributors...
Inventor claimed name Dante A. Donatelli Jr. - claimed he had discovered the Third Use of the Bernoulli’s Principle - Contributions to this CHARITY
that gives you 'Name Immortality'...big whoopee! - Phase One, 3.8
million dollar FUND-DRIVE - no proof, no details, nothing for the
investor - “CEDCO”, short for the “Clean ‘Enerpower’ Development
Corporation”, the Marketing for-profit corporation to be formed and
owned exclusively by onegift4power...Company contact - R. Hutchins, 215
Pebblebrook St., Arlington, TX 76014-1032, telephone: 877-829-5500
(US/Canada Tollfree number) AND Superpages shows Donatelli, Nancy
(related to inventor Dante with same address), 215 Pebblebrook St,
Arlington, TX 76014-1032, (817) 461-5560
|
| |
|
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
| |
Average Score: 5
Votes: 1
| |
|
|
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register |
|
Re: Claims of Electromechanical Free Energy Invention (Score: 1)
by malc on Wednesday, May 17, 2006 @ 03:35:38 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://web.ukonline.co.uk/mripley | Why do these types always make OUTRAGEOUS POWER CLAIMS but no one can do Hal Puthoffs' 1 WATT Challenge on a small scale? No, it has to be millions of dollars and massive equipment/investment as their proofs? And nothing for the contributors...
Quite! This has always puzzled me as well. In fact if we are ever to have a usable device it would have to be portable and small (in a car). Since a car requires about 10 times more peak power than a house then a domestic unit will be even smaller than a car unit. In addition it would have to be cost effective i.e. a car unit < £1000 and therefore a house unit at least < £500. Such a device, if possible, will not cost millions to produce a demo unit.
Any true demonstrable device has to be within the budget of a home inventor. The "millions" comes in when tooling up for mass production.
I'll say this again. Forget patents. Publish the device on the web with your name all over it and you will be rich from the publicity even if mega corp inc mass produces it without your involvement. Also remember this if the artic tundra melts (and its softening now!) we can all kiss our asses goodbye so money and patents means nothing. |
|
|
Re: Claims of Electromechanical Free Energy Invention (Score: 1)
by OneGift4PowerWebmaster on Thursday, June 01, 2006 @ 17:20:46 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.OneGift4Power.org | Hello All, This is the Webmaster for www.OneGift4Power.org I wanted to post to correct an inaccuracy in the original post by VLAD. The contact information on the original post is absolutely INCORRECT - As R. Hutchins is NOT the company contact - But rather, the IRS lady who is listed on our charitable IRS documentation. And, the 877-829-5500 number is also for the IRS. OUR correct contact information is listed on our website at www.OneGift4Power.org - However, we will list it here for your convienience: OneGift4Power 215 Pebblebrook St. Arlington, TX. 76014 (817) 461-5560 Phone (817) 274-4979 Fax Join@OneGift4Power.org (email) Thank you for allowing us to clarify the incorrect contact information from the original post - We hope you have a great day. Marc
|
Re: Re: Claims of Electromechanical Free Energy Invention (Score: 1)
by JakeinColorado on Thursday, June 01, 2006 @ 18:15:14 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) | Yea. I been watching the likes of Newman, Lee, and the sorts for over 25 years....All show and no go..... "Give me the money and I'll promise you the moon!" (you stupid investors!!!)
Jake |
]
|
|
Re: Claims of Electromechanical Free Energy Invention (Score: 1)
by gn0stik on Thursday, September 14, 2006 @ 08:50:01 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) | So they say they use 1 Million horse power to generate electricity for the power of the plant, which is powered by what? The HP is torque*rpm/(some magical number which I forget at this moment). How much is being used to power the motors that turn the flywheel? That must be the 1GW, they talked about. (BTW 3GW - 1GW does not equal 2080)
Ok so let's look at the math, however flawed it may be, from the article.
We've got 16 flywheels turned by motors powered at 1GW (big motors) cranking out 3 M Horsepower. 1 HP = 746 Watts or there abouts. So a Million HP would be 746M Watts. These flywheels are powered by the 1GW so we've got a net loss of 254M watts for every GWatt used to turn the flywheels on the mechanical side.
This 746M Watts then in turn cranks 32 specially contructed electrical generators that pump out a total of 3GW feeding 1 back to the loop, and and sending 2 out to the grid? ground? what? This is where the magic happens apparently. IN THE GENERATORS... It has nothing to do with the mechanical side of it, there are NET LOSSES on the mechanical side.
In short, they guy's a huckster. He can't even feed us evidence that matches with this story.
|
Re: Claims of Electromechanical Free Energy Invention (Score: 1)
by SOLIDDAD on Sunday, May 24, 2009 @ 12:05:09 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) | I am Dante A. Donatelli Jr., nick name SOLIDDAD!
I am President of ONEGIFT4POWER! Our address is 215 Pebblebrook Street, Arlington, Texas, 75014. Our phone number is *17 – 461 – 5560. Our enail is answers@onegift4power.org. Our website is www.onegift4power.org [www.onegift4power.org].
I use my computer, I don’t hide under it. I speak to the world, not just to a few who agree with me.
I placed our website on the web some 3 years ago. I made claims! The facts and text hasn’t changed, except I know a little more about Old Science today, and the claims have gotten stronger. I wrote hundreds of thousands of words, explaining what I could give away, but still, there are idiots who get it wrong, and denounce me for not giving them drawings, etc. Immediately, a certain vlad posted crap about our text. He made fun of what he is totally ignorant of. Others followed. I have to finally set all straight!
I AM WRITING THIS FOR THOSE WHO MAY HAVE THE INTELLIGENCE TO HAVE AN OPEN MIND, WANT TO KNOW THE TRUTH, AND DO NOT DEAL IN CYNICAL REMARKS ABOUT WHAT THE WORLD BELIEVE IS IMPOSSIBLE.
It seems there are quite a few experts out there who think they know everything about “Power Plants that run themselves, electrically, with no fuel added”. They make fun of our “ELECTROMECHANICAL” OPERATING SYSTEMS. Reason being, they are ignorant of the facts!
People like Dan Keele, who set up his website, Keely Net, who has never accomplished anything, but makes a living out of cynically critizing others who do, and gives a format for others, just as stupid, like a certain Dan York, who is another dork. He is totally ignorant of anything, as he cannot even get names and phone numbers right, even though they are posted in plain site. My webmaster, a few years ago, had to straighten him out. This man even went as far, as he really is stupid, to make claims my work sounds like a certain Dennis Lee’s work. I know not of this Lee person, but I guarantee, or rather my two experts in science guarantee, my work is new and novel, HAS NEVER BEEN ATTEMPTED, HAS NEVER BEEN ACCOMPLISHED, until I came along, and is a totally New Science, and born of the historical Old Physics Science, which few in the world even know. PERIOD! If they do not know the old, how in the world will they ever understand the new?
I PERSONALLY HAVE KEPT QUIET FOR THESE THREE YEARS, because I didn’t want to enter a dialogue with “Physics Dummies”, (most of these sites will not even allow me to explain my position,) but, I felt the need to speak out today, and TO EDUCATE THE IGNORANT!
I have spent near 50 years discovering and inventing Power Plants that run themselves electrically, with no added fuel! I know what is possible and impossible, heard every reason my work is impossible, read more about physics , about my work, than any physics professor in the world has read, the Old Science physics.
Point is: I know the controversy, I know the so called impossibility, but, I also know, I have achieved what I claim, and have been validated.
I have heard near every cynical remark from webworms, etc., denouncing or guessing what I own! My work is original. It is not some copy-cat magnetic energy, or anything ever placed on the web, and there are hundreds and hundreds available on the web. It has never been accomplished. The energy I use is the best, most original energy in the World. It was discovered by science in 1807, and thrown away by science in 1847, even though they didn’t know anything about this energy or how to develop it until 1856.
As far as this Hal Puthoff guy, have personally, in 1995, spoken to and communicated with Hal Puthoff, as relates to those who state I cannot even perform his 1 watt over unity test! (As I understand it, he works for or with people I really do not want to be associated with.)
In the days I spoke to him, his test was for 6 watts, BUT, HE WOULDN’T EVEN SIGN MY NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT! Truly a con artist who wanted to see, so as he could maybe steal or give to others who would steal. Of course, since I have a little intelligence, I wouldn’t show him squat! I never trusted the man! And, by the way, I have letters he wrote to me, he validating certain discoveries, if anyone thinks I am speaking out of turn.
That said, however, No One, Yes No ONE HAS “GUESSED”, (none even came close,) and many webworm denouncers have tried, posing as “engineers”, the most stupid of physics, MY TECHNOLOGY, simply because everyone who comments, cynics and others, make the one error every denouncer makes.
In 1905, Einstein, who proved the energy I use exists, stated: “For every great discovery there are a million mediocre minds to denounce it”.
I have been credited with making one of the greatest discoveries of the twentieth century.
Today, because of the world-wide web, there are at least ten million of these denouncers, and the error is a simple one.
THEY SIMPLY DO NOT KNOW PHYSICS. THEY ARE IGNORANT OF PHYSICS, PERIOD! THEY THINK THEY KNOW, BUT THE REAL;ITY IS THEY KNOW SQUAT! PERIOD!
Yes, they think because they went to college or read a book or two, they are experts.
They believe the Conservation of Energy Law is absolute. It isn’t, and Einstein, in 1905 and Paulli in 1935, both blasted holes in it. They do not even know that it is a “generalization” and not even a law. They only know that: “energy cannot be created or destroyed in any closed system”, but they do not know anything about a Power Plant system, using electricity to run it, and developing electricity, as well. Something no one in history ever accomplished. I HAVE!
They know nothing about the word “DEVELOP”, which simply means: “To bring forth from something”, versus the word they dwell on, “CREATE”, which simply means: “To bring forth from nothing”. GOD CAN CREATE, man can ONLY DEVELOP. I re-discovered the purest, simplest, cheapest ENERGY in 1957, as I re-discovered the SOMETHING that I use to accomplish what I have. Its been available for eons. In fact, it is developed on a daily basis, even as your reading this!
QUESTION: If this law as so good, and so restrictive to discover or invent anything that remotely seems to violate it, WHY DIDN’T THE SCREWBALLS OF THAT DAY, 1847, PUT THE WORD “DEVELOP” INTO THE LAW? They didn’t, and therefore it has NOTHING to do with my work. Period! I NEVER CLAIMED TO HAVE CREATED ENERGY! I ONLY CLAIM I RE-DISCOVERED THAT WHICH HAS BEEN PRESENT FOR EONS. PERIOD!
In 2006, I wrote FOUR news releases challenging, WORLD-WIDE, any physics professor, physicists, engineer or scientists, to answer 300 questions about the Old Science Physics that is history. These can be found on www.transworldnews.com, under ONEGIFT4POWER, dated September 18, October 9 and 31, and November 20th, 2006.
These questions are a matter of history.
No one, even to this date, could even answer one question, as I even offered to pay for a news release for anyone who had answers.
Point is, to this text I am now writing, I challenge anyone to answer just 10% of these questions. Bet you cannot! Unless, you spent the time, as I did to find out the answers.
QUESTIONS LIKE: Why are there at least, (as I found, as there are probably more,) 18 different definitions/explanations of ENERGY? And, why is there only ONE definition/explanation of POWER? Why are there some FIVE definitions/explanations of MECHANICAL ENERGY? And, why, if science discovered ENERGY, in 1807, and science even created a field of physics for this discovery called “CLASSICAL MECHANICS”, (read it, you may learn something from it.),…How many definitions, different definitions, not just words mixed up definitions, are there for Perpetual Motion?
For Perpetual Motion, the answer is THREE, and I use the SECOND AND THIRD, as the FIRST, IS TOTALLY IMPOSSIBLE ON EARTH. This first definition is the one everyone uses to denounce my work, BUT THEY ARE IGNORANT OF THE FACT THAT THERE ARE TWO MORE, THAT ALLOW MY WORK TO EXISTS, AS PERPETUAL MOTION, OF MY NEW SCIENCE!
ANOTHER QUESTION, AS THIS “FUEL” IS FACTUALLY AN ENERGY SOURCE, and DEVELOPS THE CHEAPEST, CLEANEST AND SAFEST ENERGY EVER GIVEN BY GOD…WHY ARE WE NOT UTILIZING THIS “FUEL”, ENERGY SOURCE, PURE ENERGY , TODAY!
Its there, I found it, its been present for eons. The “FUEL” is as cheap as dirt!, And, as plentiful, as well! So why are we not using it, instead of coal, oil, nuclear, natural gas, etc., etc., and, the one question I like best is: “If WORK was discovered in 1680, (fact,) and POWER was discovered a hundred years later, in 1780, (fact), then 127 years later, ENERGY being discovered in 1807, (double factual, as Einstein proved it exists and works, PLUS he blasts the Conservation of Energy Law,) 127 years after WORK was discovered, and if the common definition of ENERGY IS: “the capacity to perform work”, WHAT, because it couldn’t have been energy, as it wasn’t yet discovered, DID ALL THE WORK FOR THE 127 YEARS BEFORE ENERGY WAS DISCOVERED?
In other words, for the dense, HOW COULD ENERGY BE RELATED TO, THE CAPACITY FOR, ETC., ETC., WORK, WHEN WORK WAS DISCOVERED 127 YEARS PRIOR TO ENERGY?
WASN’T WORK BEING DONE FOR THOSE 127 YEARS?
What I feel happened, is that science has taken other paths, instead of following the 1807-1856 ENERGY course. Their reasons were strictly monetary. Then, because those who lived in those days, didn’t want to associate themselves with the best, most original and purest, and never used up, combusted, blown up, or exploded or reacted on, they never taught about this “fuel” in colleges. Another, not so well known reason they created this law in 1847, is that the Perpetual Motionalsits of that day were trying to put this energy to work, but failed mechanically, BUT, these inventors were taking most of the investment capital of that day, and science hates losing investment capital, so science figured it was impossible, and created their Conservation of Energy Law. THEN,…YES no one could mechanically develop this ENERGY, from the “FUEL”, but when the electric motor came along, NO, is wasn’t impossible to develop it, BUT, NOT IN MACHINES, IN POWER PLANTS! There is a tremendous difference you know!.
Ergo, “Physics dummies” graduated, have a degree on their wall, and now, because they have a computer and a hiding place, they stick their “ignorant of physics” noses where they do not belong and denounce anyone who even claims they have something new and different.
And, just one question to all those who believe that if I do not reveal my work on the web, or to a Hal Puthoff, or to anyone calling me names, or trying to cynically denounce my work, WHY WOULD I EVEN RISK LOSING JUST ONE SECRET OF A TRILLION DOLLAR TECHNOLOGY, FOR NOTHING? I have been validated, I have credentials, so why must I prove it to all the webworms. THEY WOULDN’T EVEN UNDERSTAND IT! Now, lets see all the comments about this!
WHY DOES ONE THINK I SPENT 11 YEARS STUDYING THE PHYSICS, THE OLD TIME PHYSICS, BEHIND MY WORK? Not because I wanted to, but simply because, I KNOW CAN CALL ALL IGNORANT OF THE TRUE PHYSICS FACTS. PERIOD! I KNOW ALL OF THEM. VERY, VERY, VERY FEW OTHERS KNOW ANY OF THEM! I should be given a PhD, or three Ph.D.’s, because the truth is, ITS ALL THERE. EVERY REASON I COULD ACHIEVE WHAT I CLAIM TO HAVE ACHIEVED. PERIOD!
One guy even stated that I couldn’t build a small auto engine, because autos use 4 times the electricity spurts as what a home uses, and I couldn’t package that much into an auto. Sorry to say, he’s as wrong as dirt! Period! Using inanimate objects is just the “fuel”. The speed they travel, is the developed foot-founds! A small amount of fuel, just ask Einstein, can develope a huge amount of foot pounds, at a high velocity. Fact, not fiction! Just a little clue! And, YES, foot-pounds is a unit of measure for WORK – ENERGY – POWER and NOW SOLID-POWER!
I would ask anyone who may have an interest to just look up the formula for KINETIC ENERGY. One may see, that this formula states EVERYTHING needed for the 1807-1856 PURE ENERGY and “FUEL” and the BEST ENERGY SOURCE IN THE WORLD!
MASS x VELOCITY, SQUARED
Does anyone remember Einstein’s work? He proved that a simple particle of matter, traveling at the speed of light, turned into pure ENERGY. He created, in a way, PURE ENERGY! He ALSO proved that this “fuel” never wears out, and is never consumed, and every object can in fact DEVELOP as much ENERGY as anyone wants, thus, it isn’t a conserved substance .
And, how I got there with pure and simple mechanics, just read what Dr. Richard Olenick stated in his three reports after witnessing just two of my ten Power Plant designs and models, concerning the mechanics I use, and the fact I violate no laws or principles of physics!
But, reading what a world class expert, ten times better than Hal Puthoff,… had to say, will be a stretch for those who really do not want to know the truth, but simply, because they themselves have no real talent to discover or invent anything, even a left handed tooth brush, they will continue to speak out about any persons work.
The last statement I will make herein: “ Throughout history, the day before any great discovery was made, (and there were tens of thousands since man lived in caves), it was IMPOSSIBLE to discover, and without exception, all tens of thousands of times, the denouncers came out of the wood-work, the day after,… to denounce it.”
In the 17th century, Galileo proved EVERY SCIENTISTS and TEACHER of his day, TOTALLY WRONG about what they knew about his work. Even though for 2000 years they believed their false physics, GALILEO put them all to shame, and proved them totally wrong!
THIS IS 2009, and Dante A, Donatelli Jr., will prove the entire physics community totally wrong about Classical Mechanics, the Conservation of Energy Law, the First Law of Thermodynamics, ENERGY, MECHANICAL ENERGY, “FUEL”, the mgh formula, the WORK PRINCIPLE, (WORK OUT = WORK IN), and the Law of Machines, and yes, even PERPETUAL MOTION. Guess what, IT IS POSSIBLE, ON EARTH, DEPENDING ON WHAT DEFINITION ONE USES!
The fact is, even Old Science states, unequivocally, that any man or woman CAN INVENT, yes I said CAN, invent any kind of machine, EVEN ONE THAT IS TOTALLY IMPOSSIBLE TODAY, EVEN ONE THAT APPEARS TO BE A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE, ACCORDING TO PHYSICS PROFESSORS, ETC., as long as they follow SEVEN RULES! Read it for yourself. Its called “MACHINE DESIGN”, and science wrote it!
I have followed every rule, spent near 11 years studying Old Science, because I did achieve what I claim, and I wanted to find out why I even could!
What I found was simply that: “mathematics is an extremely exact science, while physics – although it would if it could – must operate on a fair amount of faith at present. In physics, whole bodies of thought rest uneasily on theories that have never been proved, some of which will one day be found to be totally wrong.”
THIS IS ONE OF THOSE DAYS!
Remember why I am stating all these facts. I am not defending anything, I am simply proving that no one understands or knows Old Science physics, better than I. Period! ALL ARE IGNORANT OF THE TRUE PHYSICS, OLD PHYSICS, THAT WHICH IS ONLY THEORY THAT HAS NEVER BEEN PROVED!!!
I didn’t STATE THIS STATEMENT WRITTEN ABOVE, about physics, a certain Marilyn vos Savant stated this in a 1991, Parade Magazine column that she answers questions about, and by the way, for anyone’s information, SHE IS THE MOST INTELLIGENT PERSON ON EARTH, AS RECORDED IN THE GUINNESS BOOK OF WORLD RECORDS.
Yes, more intelligent than HaL Puthoff, William Hetherington, a physics professor from Oregon State University, that made certain false claims about my work and website, but I shut him up, as well! YES, even those who sit behind their computers, even those who call themselves engineers, and have a degree hanging on their wall!.
SHE IS THE MOST INTELLIGENT PERSON OUT OF ALL 6.5 BILLION, and she, even without a degree, any degree, KNOWS THE TRUTH ABOUT PHYSICS. Period! I, as well, know it, but I had to spend 11 years figuring it out!
I’m still at ONEGIFT4POWER, and I still have the same email address. If anyone wants to discuss anything with me, I am the Worlds expert on “SOLID-POWER Technology”. Period!
If I have time, I will educate those who want educated. The rest can kiss my ….!
Oh, and by the way, if anyone wants to put up millions, yes I said MILLIONS, I will prove my technology is everything I state.
One jerk even stated that because ONEGIFT4POWER is asking for 3.8 million, that I have to be wrong, because it costs a lot less to build a “model”, so, I must be wrong.
I ALREADY HAVE THE MODEL! PERIOD!
We need 3.8 million, simply because it will take all of that to have COMPLETE SUCCESS with my technology, and I will never again deal with the Hal Puthoffs of the World, trying to garnish credibility, for NOTHING!
Put up or shut up, as I really do not care to prove to the world, FOR NOTHING, that I own what I claim,…a trillion dollar technology. Period!
I have been validated by two of the worlds best PhD experts.
There is no one on Earth better, equal maybe, BUT NOT BETTER.
Hal Puthoff couldn’t be a pimple on Dr. Richard Olenicks butt, about physics, mechanics and validating what the world feels is impossible! Dr. Olenick knows it BETTER than Hal Puthoff, as Puthoff ONLY works, for big pay, in the field of physics, (for the government,) while Dr. Olenick teaches, leads others in teaching it, wrote about it, was given 2 million by the NSF to write about it for high school kids, had his own T. V. Physics show in the 90’s, etc., etc. GOOGLE him, and see his credentials, then go to our website and read his POSITIVE REMARKS about such a negative controversial subject HE MADE AND…. SIGNED HIS NAME TO!
I haven’t read one word from the web-maggots, about this validation by this expert. WHY? I know their ignorant of the facts, but are they stupid enough to think they know more than he? Or do they think I bought these two experts? Fact is, they never received one penny, stock, or any compensation for their expert validations!
|
]
|
|
Re: Claims of Electromechanical Free Energy Invention (Score: 1)
by SOLIDDAD on Thursday, May 28, 2009 @ 13:04:53 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) | To continue answering the comments above:
My name is Dante A. Donatelli Jr., nickname SOLIDDAD
I AM President of ONEGIFT4POWER, and own nine Power Plants, as I gave the charity one, so as they can propagate it. The charity is in the Fund-Raising phase of operations. I am their spokesperson, so I have to explain what I can.
I have answered a few comments, but now, because I got an email asking why I didn’t address all of them, here goes. Sorry I use so many words, but there are hundreds of thousands of words to completely explain. I use just a few!
A very stupid webworm by the name of JAKE, said he’s been watching the likes of Newman, Lee, and the sorts for over 25 years. All show and no go, he states.. “Give me the money and I’ll promise you the moon”, he also states, in quotes as if these inventors were saying it. Then, he has to add, (you stupid investors.)
Are investors stupid? According to this idiots miniature mind, but quite a few thousand have gotten rich, investing in “nuts”.
Evidently JAKE is a weird, tired, sick and jealous person. So what, all show and no go. There are many things that can hold up great inventions. One, of course is money. Another, which few realize, is pressure form Power brokers, Governments etc. Remember, IF one, like we can, perform like claims, THE TECHNOLOGY IS WORTH HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS, but if one, LIKE WE ARE, has a totally NEW SCIENCE, ERGO, A TOTALLY NEW TECHNOLOGY, which the world believes is impossible, ITS WORTH TRILLIONS. Then there is timing. Is the World ready for the product. Then, as in most cases, sorry to say, the invention isn’t powerful enough to be built any larger than a model.
I personally went to Boulder Colorado in 1996, to the Tesla Convention. I saw many beautiful models, that didn’t work. One even had a special showing, which most all attendees to the conference attended. He had nothing.
The point is, yes, there have been many busts, but I am in no position to judge them as JAKE did.
The fact is, JAKE is jealous. Jealous because he doesn’t have a “flop” or a “successful” machine. These worms always have something negative to say because they have limited brainpower, and as I stated in my last comment, couldn’t even invent a left handed tooth brush, so they sit in judgment of those who can.
I, on the other hand, HAVE SHOWN, not to the likes of him, as he isn’t anyone who has anything of value to offer, just a big blow hole, and these abound, but, I have shown some of my technology, yes, a New Science Technology and not just one device with one claim, to two of the WORLDS BEST EXPERTS, one a PhD of ME, PE, and the other a Doctor of physics, a teacher, one who teaches others to teach, (CHAIR of the physics department at the University of Dallas,) author, T. V. producer of physics shows, nationally acclaimed and given 2 million, only he, to do work for the NSF, etc.
THESE HAD WHAT I NEEDED AT THE TIME I NEEDED IT, CREDIBILITY!
THEN, AFTER I SHOWED THEM, VALIDITY!
Yes, I am heads and shoulders above all the rest, SIMPLY BECAUSE I DON’T HAVE 1000 common PHYSICS, ETC, EXPERTS, I only have TWO OF THE WORLDS BEST.
Two is plenty, when one like I claims he has “Power Plants that run themselves, ELECTRICALLY, and use no added fuel once designed and started up,” simply because the entire world, even webworms and web-maggots know this is impossible, so if two of the best state it it’s not only possible, it’s a fact, and Dante did what he claims, and he has been validated, JAKE and his friends can suck an egg.
NOW, about the money thing! I explained that in my first comment.
Now to address a certain goOstik. This person is hung up on my DYNALEVER math. I will be the first to admit, it may be confusing or even wrong.
That said, however, my DYNALEVER isn’t wrong. It is what I claim. It has been called “amazing” by the ME. Its been stated as “performs like nothing before”, by the Doctor of Physics.
WHY?
Why would two world class experts even bother making remarks. Why would either make remarks like they did. MAYBE, just maybe, it is what I claim.
But, that said, lets address the math, horsepower, watts, flywheels, motors, etc., he refers to.
FIRST, I never stated any motor was running any flywheel in the DYNALEVER Power Plants. He assumed this or dreamt it up, or assumed that because all others do it, I must as well. HE IS STUPIDLY WRONG!
My motors, which are not gigantic, they are in the range of 1,000 HP. ( even if we used larger sizes, they only draw, after power plant, DYNALEVER, ½ cylinder is started, much, much less wattage, because of the phenomena of electric motors and the fact, speed requires less that start-up, as your auto proves.) They are attached and run my mechanics, ( keeping the solid matter fuel in motion, at the desired speed,) NOT THE FLYWHEEL. The mechanics, solid matter fuel attached, runs the flywheel.
But, what I didn’t say in my description, is that we use very, very small electric motors, compared to what runs the mechanics, FIRST raising the 500,000 pounds, very, very, very slowly, THEN, the first drop starts the entire cell, as all four DYNALEVERS, are lifted at the same time.
There are 16 cells, each with its own very heavy flywheel, each with one or maybe two, (I am no expert in electrical generators,) electrical generators. There are 4 -1/2 cylinders, each ½ cylinder uses 500,000# of fuel, 2 cylinders in each cell, 2 million pounds of fuel, raising in 2.2 seconds, and dropping each 2.2 seconds, or taking 8.8 seconds for one rotation of the flywheel, (four quarters at 2.2 seconds, as all four DYNALEVERS work at the same time, two dropping while two are lifting,) and each flywheel is in the neighborhood of 100 tons, 60 foot diameter.
POINT IS: the motor we use AFTER the first drops, (four in total) in each cell, we only need another, say 1,000 HP electric motor, OR LESS, in each ½ cylinder, to keep all in motion. Remember, ONCE AGAIN, as this means everything in my innovative arrangement of mechanics, we use ALL THREE MECHANICAL ADVANTAGES of the lever, the inclined plane and the wheel and axel to lift and maintain the 500,000 pound masses of fuel, in each ½ cylinder, and EVERYONE knows that a very small amount of force can lift by the lever, or be pushed up a plane, by the inclined plane, and/or attached to the outer rim of a wheel, and THAT’S ALL THE FORCE NEEDED TO LIFT OUR MASS, FORTY FEET! We lift it very innovatively, as how else could we achieve what we do!
Remember, one of my claims is that I can .lift 1000# with only 100# of force (same ration for any amount of mass.) Not in all, as they all vary, some need 200# or 300# of force to raise each 1000#, BUT, ITS MUCH LESS, (some need much less, as they use different Basic Laws of nature and mechanical advantage, etc.,)
And, distance traveled means nothing in our Power Plants, ratio of mechanical advantage DOES, as for example, a 10 foot bar, with a fulcrum attached at the 1 foot mark, will lift 1000# with only 100#’s of force, if applied at the long or effort part of the 10 foot lever. BUT, it has to move 10 feet, for this to be applied. AND, the 1000# is only lifted 1 foot.
GREAT, we use all this Old Science physics NEGATIVES, as stated, TO OUR ADVANTAGE.
How else could my mechanics be so different, IF I DON’T APPLY FORCE DIFFERENTLY?
NOW, using only 1000 HP electric motors, or less, AFTER POWER PLANT IS STARTED UP, and multiplying these by 745 watts each requires, one gets some 745,000 watts needed, and because there are some 64, a total of 47, 680, 000 watts are needed, IF MOTORS ARE RUNNING AT FULL POWER, BUT OURS DO NOT.
Remember, someplace in my text, on the web, I state the following facts:
An electric motor needs two things to operate. Current Volume and Current Strength. VOLTS are Current Volume and AMPS are Current Strength, so
A watt is amps times volts, BUT THERE ARE TWO PHENOMENA IN EACH ELECTRIC MOTOR, concerning these volts and amps, speed and power:
ONE, when one lowers the voltage, as has been performed for decades, one gets a Variable Speed Motor, but the same Current Strength.
SECOND, when one lowers the AMPS, and keeps the VOLTS THE SAME, the electric motor looses STRENGTH, less foot-pounds developed, BUT, MAINTAINS SPEED!
NO ONE IN THE WORLD HAS EVER ACCOMPLISHED THIS, BUT I HAVE!
This simply means, once our DYNALEVER and/or any other of our Power Plants are STARTED, and OPERATING, AND DEVELOPING FOOT-POUNDS OF HORSEPOWER AND MECHANICAL ENERGY, (both energy and power have the exact same unit of measure, being the foot-pound,) BY WAY OF THE “FUEL” BEING IN MOTION, WHICH IS A FACT, AS THE MOTION IS STEADY BY A STEADY SPEED OF ANY ELECTRIC MOTOR, the electric motor, NEEDS MUCH LESS WATTAGE TO OPERATE, as per the phenomena spoken of!
I realize it is a little confusing, because I have no diagrams I want to show. If I did, it would be so clear, you would fall off your chairs. It also is so simple, as well!
This simply means, that if, as I do in the DYNALEVER, which I will explain next, DEVELOP MORE WATTAGE than I need, AFTER START UP, the entire Power Plant can run itself, ELECTRICALLY, as an electric motor CARES NOT WHERE ITS WATTS ARE COMING FROM, and an electrical generator, CARES NOT WHAT USES THE WATTS THEY DEVELOP AND DELIVER! Period! And, the lotor doesn’t run the generator directly, realizing all the back and forth pressures, as an auto, for example does. With the mechanics in the middle, all the motor has to do is run at a given speed, with less strength, and never is concerned with the mechanics running the electric generator. INNOVATIVE MECHANICS, remember! Mechanics that “have never performed like anything before”, a stated by Dr. Richard Olenick, and ‘AMAZING”, according to Ted Carnes, PhD., ME., PE.!
NOW,…. WHAT DO I DEVELOP????
Simply, as I do not want to confuse anyone, as I have been confused, as I will explain next, 500,000 pounds, falling 40 feet, in 2.2 seconds, develops some 16,500 HP, per ½ cylinder. Period!
I didn’t invent this, there is a simple Horsepower formula, which is FORCE (mass in pounds,) x DISTANCE (in feet) = foot-pounds. Divided by TIME, ( in seconds, as 550, a constant, is multiplied by the actual time, in this case 2.2 seconds,) and there it is, HORSEPOWER developed when mass falls.
NOW, COMES THE GOOD PART. Each 16,500 HP is multiplied by 10, ( or we can use 5, or 15, or 20, as the options are available, we choose 10 because of area,) as we use the mechanical advantage of all three of the simple machines, as stated, SO, 165,000 hp IS TRANSMITTED INTO ¼ th OF THE FLYWHEEL, AND THIS IS MULTIPLIED BY TWO, AS TWO MASSES ARE DROPPING WHILE TWO MASSES ARE RISING IN EACH CELL, ( A ½ CYLINDER TIMES TWO, ONE FALLING ONE RISING, SO, IN ONE QUARTER, 330,000 hp IS BEING DELIVERED, PER QUARTER.
And, when all four quarters of the flywheel have turned, accepting 330,000 HP per quarter, one has, for each cell, per each flywheel, per 4 DYNALEVERS in operation, 1,320,000 HP per ONE REVOLUTION of the VERY, VERY HEAVY FLYWHEEL, BUT, WE ALSO DELIVER HP, ON THE UP MOTION, AS WELL, but this is added, and we will not explain herein. It is to technical.
This simply means we have the capacity to apply 1,056,000 HP, when one full rotation of the flywheel is made.
Relate this to an auto engine and flywheel. Say an 8 cylinder engine, that’s rated at 320 Horsepower.
EACH CYLINDER PUTS ONLY 40 HP INTO THE SYSTEM, AT INTERVALS OF 1/8 OF THE FLYWHEELS TRAVEL.
In other words, each cylinder doesn’t apply 320 HP, but 8 times 40 applies 320 HP, PER REVOLUTION OF THE FLYWHEEL.
The same happens to our Power Plants. THAT’S WHY LITTLE BURSTS OF PUSHING or PULLING OF OUR TRANSMISSION RODS, AS IN THE LEVER EXAMPLE, ONLY MOVING A SHORT DISTANCE, DOESN’T BOTHER US, AS WE USE IT TO OUR ADVANTAGE.
Now, because our flywheel is moving slow, storing this 1 million plus HP, we have to increase the speed A LITTLE TO RUN OUR GENERATORS. For every time we double, we have to reduce the HP by 2.
So, after we reach OUR R.P.M., (REDUCED THREE TIMES,) we have approximately some 264,000 HP being applied to our specially constructed electrical generators, (AS OURS WILL BE OPERATING, DEVELOPING THE EXACT SAME WATTAGE, as others traveling at higher speeds, but ours, will have to travel slower, to develop the same wattage, or what we need, WITH A LONGER, BIGGER GENERATOR CONSTRUCTION. Generators, as I understand it, contain copper wire and magnets, and the more one uses, the slower one can run the generator, and the maximum wattage can be attained. It’s a matter of material!
Yes, expensive, BUT REMEMBER, OUR POWER PLANTS USE NO FUEL. Capital cost, although lower than coal and nuclear, on the same cost plane as natural gas, MEAN NOTHING. The yearly costs, plus the yearly actual depreciation of parts, plus maintenance of the others, costs 95% of the electric costs to the public. The DYNALEVER is projected to cost ONLY, ½ CENT PER KWH, BECAUSE OF THIS 95% LESS NEEDS, and because we generate no heat and/or consume no duel, our power plants will last for a hundred years, or so!
Fuel is the most expensive thing in any Power Plant, and heat related maintenance is second, ergo, electric prices to the consumer are high, because fuel, and maintenance costs, (including the E. P. A. rules and regulations being applied TO DOUBLE THE CAPITAL COSTS OF THOSE MENTIONED, BUT NOT TO OURS)!, all add costs that we do not have to bear!
POINT IS, whether my numbers add up or not, (as there are a few quirks in the watts, horsepower, and vice versa functions,) we use less wattage, smaller motors, simply because we use three mechanical advantages, plus the phenomena found in electric motors, both, DECREASES OUR NEEDS FOR WATTAGE TO OPERATE THE POWER PLANTS.
And, as far as we are concerned, developing over 4.2 MILLION HORSEPOWER, to operate electrical generators, can develop some 4,160 MW of electricity, COMPARING TO WHAT THE HOOVER DAM ADVERTISES! It states it develops some 2.2 Million HP, developing some 2080 MW of electricity, AS POSTED AND ADVERTISED FACT.
Calculate it anyway you want, because there are so many variables, if one wants to confuse the issue, he or she can mix up the variables, AND MAKE ME LOOK STUPID.
I AM STUPID ABOUT ELECTRICITY.
HOWEVER, I AM A GENIUS ABOUT MECHANICS!
MY CLAIM TO FAME IS THE FACT THAT I DELIVER HORSEPOWER.
ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS WILL DESIGN AND DEVELOP THE ELECTRICAL END, NOT ME! I only know the facts I read in books.
ALL I KNOW, IS I DEVELOP MUCH MORE HORSEPOWER, THAN IS NEEDED BY THE POWER PLANT TO OPERATE, ERGO, MORE HORSEPOWER DEVELOPED, LESS USED, MEANS THE POWER PLANTS WILL INDEED, RUN THEMSELVES, ELECTRICALLY, OR HORSEPOWERERLLY, IF THERE IS SUCH A WORD, WHICH I DON’T THINK THERE IS.
YOU FIGURE IT OUT! I HAVE BEEN VALIDATED! I DON’T HAVE TO FIGURE IT OUT!
ALSO, I DO NOT NEED TO PRESENT EVIDENCE TO MATCH MY STORY!
If you or any other entity doesn’t believe it, so be it. ALL I HAVE TO DO IS CONVINCE MY CONTRIBUTORS, PERIOD!
TWO WORLD CLASS EXPERTS, DO BELIEVE IT. EACH MAKES ASTOUNDING STATEMENTS, COMPARED TO THE FACT, ITS SUPPOSEDLY IMPOSSIBLE TO ACHIEVE. BUT, THAT SAID, WASN’T EVERY GREAT DISCOVERY TOTALLY IMPOSSIBLE BEFORE IT WAS DISCOVERED?
Take Portland cement, for instance. A nut, with no friends, because he would always ask them for a dime or two, by the name of Portland, stated” I can take rock, crush it, dry it out, then, when I want to, add water, and make rock again! THAT WAS THE CRAZIEST, MOST IMPOSSIBLE THING OF HIS DAY, but the fact remains, the day he died, ROCK was found in his washbasin, The problem he had for years, because he couldn’t put up, as most want, was finding the proper rock. TODAY, CONCRETE IS AS COMMON AS DIRT! Or, take the computer, for instance. Man talking to a machine, and the machine answering him back!!! CRAZY! NUTS! IMPOSSIBLE! The day before the computer was invented. SO, I RUN IN GOOD COMPANY! The “NUTS” of the world!
Web-worm, or maggots, even an engineer, sitting behind his computer, hunched down so nobody can see him, and punching out negative words, ABOUT SOMETHING HE NEVER WITNESSED, BUT READ A FEW WORDS I WROTE. MEANS NOTHING. PERIOD!
It may to his fellow web worms, BUT, NOT TO THE INTELLIGENT OF THE WORLD!.
AND, HAS ANYONE EVER THOUGHT THAT MAYBE. JUST MAYBE, I WROTE CONFUSING WORDS, just to screw with these idiots heads.
But, with MY CREDIBILITY, and VALIDATION, who needs to say anything!
Now, just to explain to those who still think he is right.
I present the following, very confusing facts!
One horsepower needs 745 watts to operate.
Two horsepower is needed to develop 1000 watts in a common electric generator.
The Hoover Dam Power Plant,. Started out in 1936, delivering some 35% less electricity, ( about 1352 MW,), but they increased the efficiency of their generators a few years ago, and today, they do not get what they started with, with common dynamos’, they get 35% more, or so, because they increased the efficiency, Not the horsepower. This cannot be increased in the Hoover Dam system, as the water depth of the Lake Mead determines this, but in our DYNALEVER Power Plant design, OURS CAN, and AS MUCH HORSEPOWER AS ONE WANTS, OR NEEDS, CAN BE DEVELOPED!.
We will start out with the most efficient electrical generators, because they will be specially built, some 32 of them, and, even though the cost of each will be, say 100% , 200% or more, more than a common one, THEY WILL DELIVER MORE ELECTRICITY, AT SLOWER SPEEDS!
Other facts:
An electric motor produces some 55 foot-pounds, or maybe 3 foot-pounds per horsepower, depending on what book one reads. This is very confusing to a person like myself, but its true. I read in a college textbook, that
1 hp = 550 ftlb/s = 745.7 watts.
1 Watt = 1.341 x 10 -3 hp.
The I found a conversion table that stated:
1J + 10/7 erg + .0738 ftlb. Multiplying 745, as one watt equals I joule, (figure this crazy physics out), equals some 549.81 foot-pounds!
Then an engineer corrected me when I used 550 ftlbs, and said its only 3 foot –pounds.
WHAT IS THE TRUTH! All I know, that whatever it is, we develop more than the electric motors uses, thus the wattage, because we ONLY need speed, will operate with much fewer watts, after start-up!
Your auto uses MAXIMUM WATTAGE, amperage, times 12 volts, WHEN STARTING, but once started, the wattage needed, is near nothing, just for a spark or two!
POINT IS: I have stated “physics is rift with errors”
The most intelligent person in the world, stated it first.
All I know, if one can take my figures and screw them up, as assumption can top anything, and erroneous physics helps these poor souls, then, call me a huckster, so be it.
I HAVE BEEN VALIDATED BY TWO WORLD CALLS EXPERTS, WHO HAVE, YES, WHO HAVE, YES I MEAN THEY HAVE, WITNESSED all I showed them.
EVERYONE ELSE, including web-worms and web-maggots can only assume, and they only can assume with FALSE PHYSICS, as I will never show them anything! PERIOD!
Now, as far as me being a HUCKSTER, I confess: YES I AM!
I am President of a charity, My job NOW is to raise funds. I am doing that. In order for me to accomplish this, I HAVE TO SELL WHAT WE OWN, WHO WE ARE, ETC., ETC., and by this definition: “one who works selling something for a client”, I AM A HUCKSTER. PERIOD!
Oh, and by the way, wonder what the web-worms and maggots would say if I explained how my DYNAPLANE or DYNAWHEEL Power Plants operate.
It would blow their small minds!
|
|
|
|
|
