ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 197 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

Bush: U.S. on Verge of Energy Breakthrough
Posted on Monday, February 20, 2006 @ 21:25:41 UTC by vlad

General jhpace1 writes: By DEB RIECHMANN, Associated Press Writer

Yahoo!News 20 Feb 2006

Saying the nation is on the verge of technological breakthroughs that would "startle" most Americans, President Bush on Monday outlined his energy proposals to help wean the country off foreign oil.

Less than half the crude oil used by refineries is produced in the United States, while 60 percent comes from foreign nations, Bush said during the first stop on a two-day trip to talk about energy.

Some of these foreign suppliers have "unstable" governments that have fundamental differences with America, he said.

"It creates a national security issue and we're held hostage for energy by foreign nations that may not like us," Bush said.


Bush is focusing on energy at a time when Americans are paying high power bills to heat their homes this winter and have only recently seen a decrease in gasoline prices.

One of Bush's proposals would expand research into smaller, longer-lasting batteries for electric-gas hybrid cars, including plug-ins. He highlighted that initiative with a visit Monday to the battery center at Milwaukee-based auto-parts supplier Johnson Controls Inc.

During his trip, Bush is also focusing on a proposal to increase investment in development of clean electric power sources, and proposals to speed the development of biofuels such as "cellulosic" ethanol made from wood chips or sawgrass.

Energy conservation groups and environmentalists say they're pleased that the president, a former oil man in Texas, is stressing alternative sources of energy, but they contend his proposals don't go far enough. They say the administration must consider greater fuel-efficiency standards for cars, and some economists believe it's best to increase the gas tax to force consumers to change their driving habits.

During his visit to Johnson Controls' new hybrid battery laboratory, Bush checked out two Ford Escapes — one with a nickel-metal-hybrid battery, the kind that powers most hybrid-electric vehicles, and one with a lithium-ion battery, which Johnson Controls believes are the wave of the future. The lithium-ion battery was about half the size of the older-model battery. In 2004, Johnson Controls received a government contract to develop the lithium-ion batteries.

While Bush is highlighting his budget proposals to help wean America from foreign oil, the lab he visited is meeting a $28 million shortfall by cutting its staff by 32 people, including eight researchers.

"Our nation is on the threshold of new energy technology that I think will startle the American people," Bush said. "We're on the edge of some amazing breakthroughs — breakthroughs all aimed at enhancing our national security and our economic security and the quality of life of the folks who live here in the United States."

Later Monday, Bush visited the United Solar Ovonics Plant, which makes solar panels, in Auburn Hills, Mich., outside Detroit. "This technology right here is going to help us change the way we live in our homes," Bush told reporters.

Bush said he was impressed with the growing commercial uses of solar energy.

"Roof makers will one day be able to make a solar roof that protects you from the elements and at the same time, powers your house," Bush said. "The vision is this — that technology will become so efficient that you'll become a little power generator in your home, and if you don't use the energy you generate you'll be able to feed it back into the electricity grid."

Rep. Ed Markey, D-Mass., questioned Bush's energy policies Monday, saying the administration also supports subsidies for luxury SUVs.

"This single tax subsidy dwarfs anything being done for hybrid batteries," Markey said in a news release.

On Tuesday, Bush plans to visit the Energy Department's National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden, Colo., to talk about speeding the development of biofuels.

As a complement to Bush's travels, six Cabinet officials are crisscrossing the nation this week, appearing at more than two dozen energy events in more than a dozen states.
--------

Source: Bush_Energy


 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about General
· News by vlad


Most read story about General:
Z machine melts diamond to puddle


Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"Bush: U.S. on Verge of Energy Breakthrough" | Login/Create an Account | 5 comments | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Remarks by President Bush on Energy (Score: 1)
by vlad on Monday, February 20, 2006 @ 21:36:32 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com
PR Newswire (press release) - New York,NY,USA

... So let me talk to you about the first one. Our nation is on the threshold of some new energy technologies that I think will startle the American people. ...

Read the whole article here: Energy_remarks_by_Bush [www.prnewswire.com]



Re: Remarks by President Bush on Energy (Score: 1)
by seanpu1 on Tuesday, February 21, 2006 @ 08:54:37 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)
Roundup: new vehicles using ethanol, hydrogen, electricity, homemade. Coal, more nuclear planets, solar and wind.


First, invest in new kinds of vehicles that require much less gasoline. It's a practical thing to do.  Secondly, find new fuels that will replace gasoline and, therefore, dependence on oil.  And, finally, develop new ways to run a car without gasoline at all. ...... Hybrid vehicles have both a gasoline-powered engine and an electric battery based on technologies that were developed by the Department of Energy.  In other words, this technology came to be because the federal government made a research commitment.
......
We're also supporting the development of advanced fuels that can replace regular gasoline.  Here again I'm talking to folks who know what I'm talking about -- I'm talking about ethanol.  You've got a lot of it here in Wisconsin because you've got corn.
......
And so we proposed spending $150 million for government and private research into ...homegrown fuels.  It's an important initiative.  We want to provide our consumers with reasonable, cost-effective ways to help us become less dependent on foreign sources of oil.
......
And that is we're spending money -- your hard-earned money -- on research to develop a vehicle that will not use gasoline and it won't produce any pollution whatsoever.  And that's through hydrogen.
......
Coal has the potential to reduce our reliance on natural gas.  The problem is we've got to make sure that we can keep our commitment to the environment. Coal requires investment to make sure that we don't pollute our air. .... I told folks when I was running for President the first time around that we would invest $2 billion over 10 years to promote clean coal technology.  In other words, I believed, as did many others, that technology will help us deal with this dilemma.
......
 I think we ought to start building nuclear power plants again.  I think it makes sense to do so.  Technology is such that we can do so and say to the American people, these are safe -- and they're important. ... The administration has also launched what's called Nuclear Power 2010 Initiative.  It's a $1.1 billion partnership between the government and industry to facilitate new plant orders.  ...  This time last year, only two companies were seeking to build nuclearpower plants; now nine companies have expressed a new interest in new -- interest in new construction.  They're considering as many as 19 new plants. This progress is going to help an important goal.  We'll start building nuclear power plants again by the end of this decade.  As part of our strategy, as part of our way to make sure that the future is bright and that America remains a leader in the world is to understand the promise of nuclear power.
    We're also going to work with other nations to help them build nuclear power industries.  And the reason why is this is a global world in which we live and demand for oil in China and India affects price here in America.  And so, therefore, if we can help relieve the pressure off of demand for fossil fuels, it helps the entire world.
[author's note: hence perhaps the pressure on iran who has one of, if not the, biggest known uranium deposits in the world]
e of the concerns you hear from the critics of expanding nuclear power is all this will do to create proliferation concerns.  Well, here's one way to address those concerns -- to say, we'll provide the fuel for you -- and we'llcollect the fuel from you, by the way.  And after we collect the fuel from you, we need to reprocess the spent nuclear material.  By reprocessing you can continue to use the fuel base, but equally importantly, we'll reduce the amount of nuclear waste that needs to be stored.
......
Another electricity source with enormous potential is solar power.  Today Americans use small amounts of solar power, mainly to heat water or to power small consumer products like outdoor lights.
......
 Another promising renewable is wind.  You're getting -- as Laura says, when you speak too long you're a little windy.  (Laughter.)  I'm not saying I'm wind power -- (laughter) -- but I am telling you I recognize the importance of wind power.

end




]


Re: Bush: U.S. on Verge of Energy Breakthrough (Score: 1)
by malc on Tuesday, February 21, 2006 @ 00:28:47 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://web.ukonline.co.uk/mripley
I've said it before there is something awfully suspicious about the US and the Uk's attitude to energy.  A recent report has stated that unless we address the energy problem asap we could well have blackouts during the Olympics in 2012. The government talks about nuclear as a solution but if it was serious it would have to start building now for them to be online in time (current power stations are about to be decommisioned as well !).  There is no serious investment in green alternatives either although there is lots of talk and a few wind farms here and there. It's all very very strange unless.......Bush and Blair KNOW that there is a solution.  I would suspect that this is the case and the problem is to make the "solution" appear as if it has just recently been developed and not sat on for years by the military and/or oil companies.

Another problem is tax. How do you switch from an energy source you can tax i.e. x% per gallon to one that is a one-off cost. A one-off cost device that provides energy for "free" has to be cost effective enough to be purchased by the consumer and yet enable the government to a replace its oil taxes. Hmmm tricky one.



Re: Bush: U.S. on Verge of Energy Breakthrough (Score: 1)
by bender772 on Tuesday, February 21, 2006 @ 05:24:39 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.suppressedscience.net
I wish Bush was refering to real energy breakthroughs. I wish some of his puppet masters had seen the light and accepted that humanity needs the breakthrough energy and transportation technologies that are being developed by independent researchers and inventors, or - if they exist - the already highly developed ones that are rumored to be locked up in special access military programs. But when you look at his actual comments - http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/02/20060220-1.html you will find that his "breakthroughs" are just the same old same old: incremental improvements to existing technologies designed the prolong the life expectancy of the status quo, and to make sure that business as usual continues a little longer. Bush's "breakthroughs" are improvements to plug-in hybrid cars and ethanol production from waste. Not solid-state vacuum energy devices, magnetic motors that power themselves and an attached load without fuel input, not negative resistors, cars that run on water, not anti-gravity and not inertia control. Admittedly, working demonstration devices that could convince a skeptic of the reality of the latter list of real breakthroughs are and remain a little scarce. But the same can't be said for cold fusion and focus fusion. The latter isn't even based on new physics. If Bush was truly interested in energy breakthroughs, he would immediately divert a major part of the funds that are currently wasted on the dead-end conventional hot fusion program into focus fusion and LENR.


]


Re: Bush: U.S. on Verge of Energy Breakthrough (Score: 1)
by nanotech on Tuesday, February 21, 2006 @ 18:35:18 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)
Here is my question: Was Bush referring to REAL NEW ENERGY technologies, like Hydrinos, Zero Point Radiation Energy, Aether, Cold Fusion, Etc etc etc, or was he talking about "conventional" new or alternative energies, like solar, hydrogen, biofuel, etc?

Also: How can we take him seriously when his entire family became billionaries through oil?




 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.