ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 198 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

Minato Motors -- No Over Unity
Posted on Tuesday, April 20, 2004 @ 10:55:00 UTC by rob

General Overtone writes: I recently received a copy of the Minato Report done by Dr. Mark Comings, a few years ago, for ISSO, the now defunct Space Science Organization. ISSO flew Minato and his motors to San Francisco, where careful tests were done.


Minato had not utilized a scope, and as mentioned earlier, he is a musician and not an engineer. They concluded their tests clearly indicated his motors were not Over Unity. While their tests may contain certain flaws, my conclusion, as of today, would agree with theirs.

It was my hope that Minato had used the intervening time to improve his technology, but at this time I would say, if he has, it is not obvious. I suspect he is still measuring incorrectly. The design seems to be unimproved. The ultimate test, which ISSO also suggested, remains a self-running example. In the absence of such, it would seem his are well designed, highly efficient, motors but they are not likely to demonstrate breakthrough new science.

This is not to suggest that Over Unity cannot be achieved with a rotary magnetic machine. It simply indicates that the only real test of such a device, reflecting a new form of energy conversion, must remain the ability to self-power.

Mark Goldes
Chairman & CEO
Magnetic Power Inc.


 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about General
· News by rob


Most read story about General:
Z machine melts diamond to puddle


Article Rating
Average Score: 5
Votes: 1


Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"Minato Motors -- No Over Unity" | Login/Create an Account | 15 comments | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: Minato Motors -- No Over Unity (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 20, 2004 @ 22:09:24 UTC
Hello

Would you please make the Minato Report available for the public - eg. put it on this website.

Regards Sofa



Minato Motors -- No Over Unity (Score: 1)
by bodebliss on Tuesday, April 20, 2004 @ 22:49:55 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://picoscience.8m.com/
Poor Minato.

His picture reminded me of Gimli ,the dwarf.



Re: Minato Motors -- No Over Unity (Score: 1)
by Rastahal on Wednesday, April 21, 2004 @ 11:03:42 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://truthbells.com
Mark,
Thanks for the report on the Minato Motors, I enjoy reading your posts. I'm still excited about the design of the motors, and I would like to know just how efficent they are compared to conventional devices.

Considering how much we use electric motors in our present day world, and how much power standard designs currently need to run, I'm thinking we could do a LOT better by adapting his design, even though "overunity" is still somewhere down the road.

Perhaps this is a small step towards an actual overunity device, but I'm thinking it would be a huge leap over current day electric motor efficiency and would go a long way to move us in the right direction. Was there anything in these tests you mention that would point out how much more efficient these motors are over current designs?

Also, you've piqued my interest in several or your posts regarding the use of "utility" equipment and the possibility of converting them to ZPE devices.

I'm currently employed by a large West Coast utility and, for that reason, would love to hear you elaborate on this a little bit.

Keep those posts coming!

Onward,
rh



Successful replication of Minato Motor? (Score: 1)
by vlad on Wednesday, December 11, 2013 @ 20:56:16 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com
From KeelyNet.com: Kohei Minato [www.geek.com] has been working on his idea since the 1970s, and his developments have left most other ideas for magnetic engines in the dust.The underlying premise for his machines is a combination of two electromagnet stators placed at opposing sides of a circular structure, with a rotor inside the structure that has magnets embedded in its arms. The magnets are embedded at a specific angle, which allows them to not become locked up as they interact with the electromagnets. The result is that the only power needed to run the rotor is the small amount to power the electromagnets...

More: http://www.keelynet.com/news/120913j.html [www.keelynet.com]



 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.