ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 164 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events
  • (August 7, 2024 - August 11, 2024) 2024 ExtraOrdinary Technology Conference

  • Hot Links
    Aetherometry

    American Antigravity

    Closeminded Science

    EarthTech

    ECW E-Cat World

    Innoplaza

    Integrity Research Institute

    New Energy Movement

    New Energy Times

    Panacea-BOCAF

    RexResearch

    Science Hobbyist

    T. Bearden Mirror Site

    USPTO

    Want to Know

    Other Info-Sources
    NE News Sites
    AER_Network
    E-Cat World
    NexusNewsfeed ZPE
    NE Discussion Groups
    Energetic Forum
    EMediaPress
    Energy Science Forum
    Free_Energy FB Group
    The KeelyNet Blog
    OverUnity Research
    Sarfatti_Physics
    Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
    Vortex (old Interact)
    Magazine Sites
    Electrifying Times (FB)
    ExtraOrdinary Technology
    IE Magazine
    New Energy Times

    Interesting Links

    Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
    SciTech Daily Review
    NEXUS Magazine

    What ever happend to the Patterson cell?
    Posted on Saturday, February 07, 2004 @ 20:07:34 GMT by vlad

    Devices Eric Krieg writes: I tried to contact these people years ago when Malloves "Infinite Energy Magazine" was anticipating them being part of the immiment inevitable mainstreaming of cold fusion. I pretty much offered those people, "hey, let me check out a cell as an independent investigator and I will publish my results openly".

    After a little back and forth dialog, they pretty much rebuffed my offer to possibly become a converted skeptic with the response, "we want people to think it's impossible so we don't have competition". I thought it was a good dodge, more creative than Newman's or Lee's excuses to evade independent confirmation. But basically, like most FE claims they did a slow fade out in the world of uncritical FE reporting while some new exciting claimant was getting credulous free publicity. I got the impression that Patterson had done real things in his early years, wasn't a complete nut, but he was no longer running on all cylinders and surronded himself with people who would nod yes on queue. I wish I had time to update my list with all these many different FE claimants who faded away. Naturally the prime time TV program that gave Patterson free publicity would never look back and let people know it died. There are probably a few people stilll believing in Patterson cells thinking they will soon unlock the secret. But that is just my jaded opinion.

    Eric Krieg

     
    Login
    Nickname

    Password

    Security Code: Security Code
    Type Security Code

    Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

    Related Links
    · More about Devices
    · News by vlad


    Most read story about Devices:
    Overunity magnet motor released !


    Article Rating
    Average Score: 5
    Votes: 1


    Please take a second and vote for this article:

    Excellent
    Very Good
    Good
    Regular
    Bad


    Options

     Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


    "What ever happend to the Patterson cell?" | Login/Create an Account | 1 comment | Search Discussion
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

    No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

    Re: What ever happend to the Patterson cell? (Score: 0)
    by Anonymous on Saturday, February 07, 2004 @ 20:35:57 GMT
    Funny that you didn't know about these independent tests already, but check
    out the following very interesting (negative) results conducted by Hal Puthoff's
    EarthTech group:

    http://www.earthtech.org/experiments/rifex/rifex.pdf

    The Rifex kit (Patterson Cell) is/was sold by CETI (Clean
    Energy Technologies Inc. ) I don't know the nature of the close relationship
    between Patterson and CETI, but CETI is the company which researches
    and produces Patterson cells.



     

    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
    Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.