ZPEnergy.com - What happened to Floyd Sweet's work?

ZPE_Logo

Search


Create an account	Home · Topics · Downloads · Your Account · Submit News · Top 10

Mission Statement

Modules

· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online

There are currently, 155 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

(August 12, 2026 - August 16, 2026) TeslaTech Annual Conference 2026

Hot Links

Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources

NE News Sites

AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE

NE Discussion Groups

Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)

Magazine Sites

Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

NEXUS Magazine

What happened to Floyd Sweet's work?
Posted on Wednesday, February 20, 2002 @ 22:22:00 UTC by vlad

Testimonials

In a recent letter published on his site last week, Tom Bearden gives some interesting details about what happened to Floyd Sweet's work. He also tells us that:
"... The Sweet device has been partially replicated by at least four experimenters. Each succeeded in activating the magnets into self-oscillation, and in getting power out more than the input205
205 the major problem is to get a strong, stable self-oscillation established in the magnets themselves, before building the unit. Once that is done, the Sweet unit can be replicated. His first unit produced only 6 watts, but his second unit produced 500 watts output for a 10 Volt, 33 milliampere input. So that's a COP (if I didn't drop a decimal somewhere!) of about 1,500,000.
None of the inventors I know of who replicated it, ever achieved such a COP. To my knowledge, the longest they achieved the activation was about 6 weeks. At least one did light a 100-watt bulb or so, but the output decayed. Often the activation (by the others) would last only a minute or two, then a few minutes as they got better at it, etc.

And in my view, yes, the unit could be replicated and developed, but only by a very competent team having several disciplines..."

Read the entire letter at: href=http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/021502b.htm>http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/021502b.htm

Login

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links

· More about Testimonials
· News by vlad

Most read story about Testimonials:
Dr. Eugene Mallove is dead

Article Rating

Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Options

Printer Friendly

Printer Friendly

"What happened to Floyd Sweet's work?" | Login/Create an Account | 1 comment | Search Discussion

The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: What happened to Floyd Sweet's work? (Score: 1)
by Anonymous on Thursday, February 21, 2002 @ 22:33:00 UTC

mathew g whitney (omegawatt@yahoo.com) writes: I think that with the exponential growth of science and technology the need for interdisciplinarianism (love that word!) is increasing too. An official G.U.T. lies not too far into the future but for it to happen by definition ALL branches of science must find their self-similarity, must be consolidated. The great truth must encompass all the littler truths.
Until then there will be camps (big bang vs. ____) warring for the dominant model. They'll probably keep throwing out equations until the cows come home but...
The problem is that academia has failed to recognize it is churning out nothing but SPECIALISTS.

As an inventor, self taught to associate otherwise conflicting models I see this all the time.

As we are drawn to the G.U.T. these specialists will be forced to work together and their success lies in their interest and humility...

We in the ZPE scene are in a unique position because the devices we conceive are not only novel, helpfull and amazing they are the experimental proof for a G.U.T. rendering many equations unnecessary or false.

The sooner this proof is put forth the sooner all other physicists/scientists can discard their assumptions and work straight from the fact.

The aether vs. no aether "debate" is the most fundemental...


All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice. Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.