 |
There are currently, 687 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
| |
| |
SEAS Letter to Promising Inventors re: R and D Program
Posted on Sunday, July 20, 2003 @ 13:24:16 UTC by vlad
|
|
Dear SEAS Supporter,
We have posted the following letter on the SEAS web site at SEAS letter to inventors, to alert possible new inventors that we have a new program being set up that could provide Research and Development funds for promising technologies. If you know of an inventor whose present state of technology development fits the criteria, please send the announcement to them and have them contact us.
SEAS Letter to Promising Inventors
re: R and D Program
July 18, 2003
During the course of SEAS' search for a robust, multi-kilowatt
over unity technology, we have discovered a surprising number of
promising inventors such as you who have devices in various stages
of development.
We at SEAS believe that such promising technologies deserve
professional R & D support so that they may be fully developed
and brought out to the public to address the growing energy and
environmental crisis facing humanity.
We are developing a program to do just that. Specifically, SEAS
is looking for existing prototypes that prove a significant
breakthrough in energy savings, new forms of energy generation
or propulsion. These would include, but are not limited to, over
unity electromagnetic systems, solid state 'free energy' systems,
anti-gravity or gravity influencing systems and transitional
technologies such as those that convert existing internal
combustion vehicles to high miles-per-gallon vehicles.
If you have such a technology and an existing, already built
working prototype or proof of principle device, please let us
know. Our criteria for consideration in the SEAS Research and
Development Programs are:
> That the inventor has an existing device for evaluation
by SEAS
> That the inventor, except in rare exceptions, can travel
to the Washington DC area to have the device evaluated
and meet with the SEAS technical team
> That in exchange for research and development support and
funding, that the inventor agrees to license any resulting
technology to SEAS
> That the inventor (with rare exception) can locate to the
SEAS Research Center to work with SEAS in the development
of the technology for a period of time (to be determined
on a case by case basis
> That the inventor is able to work cooperatively with other
professionals and engineers in the development of the
technology
The accepted inventors and technologies will be supported and
funded by SEAS based on the merits of the technology and the
exigencies of the particular situation.
Once we have reviewed and accepted a limited number of inventor
projects, we will work to obtain the needed financial, logistical
and engineering support from the vast SEAS network so that all
accepted projects are fully supported and reach their optimal
level of development.
Please contact SEAS Chief Technology Officer Dr. Ted Loder
by email at tedloder@seaspower.com if you feel you may be a
candidate for this program.
Sincerely,
Steven M. Greer MD
CEO SEAS
|
| |
|
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
| |
Average Score: 4
Votes: 2
| |
|
|
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register |
|
SEAS Letter to Promising Inventors re: R and D Program (Score: 1)
by Rastahal on Sunday, July 20, 2003 @ 15:46:12 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://truthbells.com | After reading this article, it seems that perhaps Mr. Greer and team (SEAS) have taken some time to evaluate the last approach to finding a credible OU technology, after suffering through the last failed attempt to get such a device into the public eye. From this letter, the focus seems to have changed somewhat, from getting such a device disclosed, to getting such technology supported and funded.
For myself, I'm glad to see Dr. Greer and SEAS back in the news of the OU technology field, hopefully with a strengthened focus and determination. |
|
|
SEAS Letter to Promising Inventors re: R and D Program (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Monday, July 21, 2003 @ 01:12:28 UTC | Am I to believe there will be no Z-prize?
This is no different than the Z-Prize, actually less logical - its redundant. If Somebody didn't have a working prototype 3 months ago for the Z-Prize they don't have it now for the R+D program. Furthermore if an inventor has a working prototype its self evident the R+D phase of a given project has been passed.
All this is is the same solicitation without prize money.
I've lost all respect for SEAS, I've sent them two fully enabling concepts which are merely innovations to proven technology yet thier tech advisors are consistantly baffled.
If you ask one of them who Schauberger or Moray is they don't know.
My advice to Greer is this:
1 - create webpage similar to this http://www.top10-free-energy.com/vote.html
2 - have worldwide open peer review from anybody with or without credentials via the www
3 - Give funding to best consensus idea(s)
OR
4 - Infiltrate underground bases, black budget labs with telepresence microbots and remote viewing for counter-intelligence, use proof of free energy devices as basis for political upheaval.
5 - Give all your money to the most insane, megalomaniac with a clue and let 'em go nuts.
6 - Fire your tech advisors and hire William Beaty and his crew.
That is if you're serious.
Otherwise get out of the game... |
|
|
SEAS Letter to Promising Inventors re: R and D Program (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Tuesday, July 22, 2003 @ 22:50:51 UTC | One of the SEAS clauses is:
That in exchange for research and development support and funding,
----->that the inventor agrees to license
I WOULD READ THE LICENCING CONDITIONS VERY CAREFULLY!
What an easy way for SEAS to gain control of any so-called device !
Which would be worth billions.
And it only cost then a couple of $100,000 for R&D
BEWARE - budding inventors -
This is just another notch on GREER's scam card
|
|
|
tightrope act (Score: 1)
by chipotle_pickle on Tuesday, July 22, 2003 @ 23:26:16 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://freehydrogen.blogspot.com | The Zprize rules made it fairly scam-proof, which is a good thing. But a few inventors have claimed that it's no big deal, in that it's not really a prize but only a minimum royalty commitment to be paid out against SEAS profits. Compare to Randi's prize, which would give the inventor $1m cold cash and not take any rights to the device. So the prize was redundant.
But now what's the role of the project? For a working invention in a product prototype state, the various skeptic prizes are available. For an invention that's a scientific anomaly, but a measurement headache, Hal Puthoff is available to provide access to good measurement. (None of the skeptics prizes are set up by people who have labs that could test Chris Arnold's invention, for example.) So Puthoff and like minded experimentalists provide a real service.
Is there anything SEAS can do other than get into trouble? Maybe they can provide a service by providing small allowances for inventors to travel to cooperative labs to assist in constructing their devices and participating in tests. They should get releases to publish the results, since I'm sure that skeptical publishers will be happy to publish a book of their experiments. Maybe inventors will be more likely to subject their devices to independent tests if it is facilitated by someone they perceive as friendly. |
|
|
|
|
