This is a letter sent (2009) to Michio Kaku by Robert W. Koontz, Ph.D., Experimental Nuclear Physicist (from his site: http://www.doctorkoontz.com/): Open Letter to Professor Michio Kaku: "You Could Be Sued for Millions and Ridiculed for Centuries"
Dear Dr. Kaku:
This open letter relates to your disparagement of
energy-producing devices which at this juncture in time are demonstrably
critical to our nation's survival. And I write this letter as a Ph.D.
experimental nuclear physicist with qualifications that I believe allow me
to speak to the subject in question, namely production of energy using
I ask that you read this letter carefully and ask that you
not dismiss it out of hand in the manner of many of our country's
Recently, on the popular late-night radio program, "Coast to Coast AM," which reportedly has
a listening audience of millions, you indicated that investors call you up
daily and ask whether certain inventions will work. Characterizing
those devices as "perpetual
motion machines" you said they were impossible to make. But that can be
proven to be a false statement. Such devices can exist
if negative mass electrons can be introduced into electronic circuits and possibly
certain machines. They can also exist if other forms of negative
energy can be created, and apparently they can. Finally, it appears
to be the case that gauge transformations could allow such devices to work.
This would not involve a violation of one of the most important laws of
physics, namely energy conservation,
either, Dr. Kaku. I believe you assume that such devices do violate
the laws of physics, which is also an assumption that appears to be made
Dr. Kaku: You appear to believe that the universe has 11 dimensions,
many of which are supposed to be hidden. Why would that be true
while creation of energy using negative mass electrons or using gauge
transformations would be impossible? Could you be wrong, sir? Undoubtedly
you think you are not wrong, but could you be wrong, sir?
You might say to me that negative mass electrons have never been
seen. But those many dimensions you believe in have never been seen
either. And is it not true that we physicists for decades have used negative mass
electrons in our theories in order to reach agreement with
experiment? And wasn't the positron discovered because Dirac
invoked the existence of negative mass electrons -- approximately 80 years
Perhaps it is true that we physicists have not yet
observed negative mass electrons, but does that mean they do not exist?
Now let me ask you this: Have you ever examined even one
of the devices that you tell investors cannot work? I suspect you haven't. There are
in fact inventions that produce energy without having any kind of
You may see one work in a web page of mine linked to below. But perhaps you
think you don't
even need to look. Could that be the case, Dr. Kaku? Perhaps
you simply "know" these devices can't work. Might you not
also have said many years ago that airplanes could
never fly? Before the Wright brothers were flying airplanes,
renowned scientists said it was impossible. So, I ask that you
examine the video linked to below and I ask that you examine other such
(Please give the video time to load -- as the file is
large. The small black device shown in the video is producing the
power. Then a larger unit is shown.)
Here is the link to another web page of mine that has
links to more such TPU videos. I can assure you the TPU device
works, sir. For the sake of our nation and the world, I ask that you take
the small amount of time needed to examine these videos.
Please don't say that the above demonstrations were faked,
Dr. Kaku. There are many engineers who examined the device.
And some demonstrations were made outdoors, far from any possible sources
The TPU units shown in the videos apparently use gauge transformations. Those would be the same kind
of gauge transformations that, for decades, you theorists have been
telling us allow for electromagnetic energy non-conservation, but
then say don't have any practical applications. And we know that
theoretical physicists are never wrong, don't we? So the device
cannot work, can it? So why then does it work?
Could it be that gauge transformations do have
practical applications? Could it thus be that theoretical physicists
could be wrong about the impracticality of using gauge transformations to
make energy? I think so.
Do not gauge transformations lead to electromagnetic
energy non-conservation? And is it not true that in your analysis of
free energy devices you assume that electromagnetic energy is
conserved? That is a grave inconsistency, sir. And arguing that
gauge transformations lead to no change in the electric and magnetic
fields is not at all convincing as the question relates to energy, not
electric and magnetic fields.
Would you say that gauge waves cannot exist? And if
you do allow that they can exist, would they not carry energy, possibly in
both positive and negative forms?
Where then am I wrong, Dr. Kaku? Or could I be right -- along with
many other Ph.D. physicists and engineers who are regularly dismissed as
You have said that you greatly respect the work of Nikola
Tesla, and surely you have studied his inventions and his life. If so, then you might
be aware that Nikola Tesla was planning to transmit power all over the
world in a way that you would surely say is impossible. But you must
know that Nikola Tesla was a very careful experimenter who tested every
idea before employing it. What then is the answer to the implied
So, Nikola Tesla was just a wild man, right? A nut.
While Michio Kaku and his 11 dimensions make wonderful sense. Or
could you and others be wrong about what Nikola Tesla was doing?
Could it even be the case that Tesla was using electromagnetic theory that
included the very gauge transformations that physicists of this era do not
include? Is that not possible, sir, and if not, why not?
Therefore, if I may speak freely, I would say that while millions or even billions of people live
in desperate poverty, and while millions of Americans lose their jobs
because we don't have this kind of technology -- you tell people that such
technology is impossible, when it isn't.
Is everyone who disagrees with you and other leading
theorists a crackpot, Dr. Kaku? Was Nikola Tesla a crackpot? I
would strongly suggest that he wasn't at all a crackpot but was one of the
greatest inventors in the history of the world -- and I believe you have
also said as much. So why then would you dismiss Tesla's ideas about
I must say that I have seen many smirks in association
with production of free energy -- Smirks -- while millions of Americans lose their jobs and
the United States falls into a terrible economic decline. Smirks. Is
that appropriate, sir? I would say not.
But the matter does not end with the above TPU
units. There is also the work of Thomas Henry Moray who was
able to produce an estimated 50 kilowatts of power from a tabletop unit that my
analysis indicates involved employment of negative mass electrons which
Dr. Moray apparently captured in very special circuits he built -- many,
many decades ago.
Here is a link to what I have written about Dr. Moray's
work. There are many more links on the Internet: Please do take the
time to investigate. A world desperate for energy waits.
Robert W. Koontz, Ph.D.
Experimental Nuclear Physicist
The URL of my web site is given below. There is a
link on the main page to my bio:
[vlad]: Let me know if anybody is aware of a reply from Prof. Kaku.