ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 205 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events
  • (August 17, 2017 - August 20, 2017) EU 2017 Conference

  • Hot Links
    Aetherometry

    American Antigravity

    Chava Energy

    Closeminded Science

    EarthTech

    Energy Science

    Energy21

    Innoplaza

    Integrity Research Institute

    Interstellar Technologies

    JLN Labs

    KeelyNet

    New Energy Movement

    New Energy Times

    The Orion Proj.

    Panacea-BOCAF

    QVac_Eng

    RexResearch

    Science Hobbyist

    Tom Bearden's Page

    Unlimited electric energy

    USPTO

    Want to Know

    Other Info-Sources
    NE News Sites
    AER_Network
    Alternative Energy News
    KeelyNet_News
    NextEnergyNews
    PESWiki/News
    NE Discussion Groups
    Energetic Forum
    Energy2000
    Free_Energy
    Greenglow
    JLNLabs
    KeelyNet
    NuEnergy
    OverUnity
    Sarfatti_Physics
    Sweet-VTA
    Tapten
    Tomorrow-energy
    Vortex
    Magazine Sites
    Distributed Energy
    Electrifying Times
    ExtraOrdinary Technology
    IE Magazine
    New Energy Times

    Interesting Links

    Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
    SciTech Daily Review
    NEXUS Magazine
    radioioAmbient

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory reactor fails
    Posted on Monday, October 03, 2016 @ 14:09:22 EDT by vlad

    Science From Physics Today: Director forced to step down after Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory reactor fails
    The world’s most powerful spherical tokamak will be off-line for a year while new magnets are built.

    The director of the flagship US fusion research laboratory was forced to resign in the wake of a mishap that has caused an extended shutdown of one of the world’s top fusion experiments. The failure two months ago of a magnet at the National Spherical Torus Experiment Upgrade (NSTX-U) is expected to take the machine out of commission for a year...


    Full text here: Director forced to step down after Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory reactor fails

    [Vlad] I found Donald Jasby's comment very appropriate:

    The Prager matter is the latest of forced resignations of directors of fusion labs. The previous Director of PPPL (Goldston) was also forced to resign after his pet project, the NCSX stellarator, could not be built after expending more than $100M, and in fact the machine was never fully designed.

    Two years ago NIF (Livermore) director Moses (2014) was force to resign because of his ongoing false claims of “guaranteed ignition” for NIF and the viability of laser-fusion power plants by the mid-2020’s.

    Meanwhile in Europe, the JET project at Culham Lab. has not produced a significant fusion result in the last 10 years or more. Every JET 5-year program since 2000 has planned to perform experiments with 50-50 D-T fuel, but they have always been postponed. JET cannot even replicate the fusion results that it reported 20 years ago, which form much of the basis of projected ITER performance. This refusal to use fusion fuel has not stopped Culham director Cowley from proclaiming in one speech after another that fusion power plants are about to take over the world’s energy supply. Fed up with non-performance and endless delay, European funding sources have forced Cowley to announce his imminent retirement.

    --Donald Jasby

    In this train of machine debacles and director “retirements”, there is a message to fusioneers. This lesson is that to sustain the fusion enterprise, expensive Public Relations depts. and grandiose promises are not quite enough. The lavishly funded fusion show cannot continue indefinitely on the basis of P.R. propaganda about continued great achievements when there have been none, and promises to deliver a working fusion power reactor in 10 years when it’s probably impossible on any time scale.

    No, there actually has to be a significant real result once in a while, such as once a decade. (My gosh, who wodhavthunkit?) Otherwise, even the bureaucrats get antsy that the normally sedated taxpayer will bestir himself, and the guillotine is dusted off and rolled out for the lab. director.

     
    Login
    Nickname

    Password

    Security Code: Security Code
    Type Security Code

    Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

    Related Links
    · More about Science
    · News by vlad


    Most read story about Science:
    100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


    Article Rating
    Average Score: 4
    Votes: 1


    Please take a second and vote for this article:

    Excellent
    Very Good
    Good
    Regular
    Bad


    Options

     Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


    Associated Topics

    Devices

    "Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory reactor fails" | Login/Create an Account | 1 comment | Search Discussion
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

    No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

    Re: Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory reactor fails (Score: 1)
    by pulsed_ignition on Monday, October 24, 2016 @ 08:52:48 EDT
    (User Info | Send a Message) http://diamondlube.com

    Should their be active interest in funding a Fusion device that is functional, contact

    Chris Arnold

    chris@diamondlube.com




     

    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
    Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.