This letter will be sent to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II
To: Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II
c.c. to: Vice-Chancellor's Private Office of the University of Cambridge
Leszek Borysiewicz , Vice-Chancellor
Rebecca Simmons , Head of the Vice-Chancellor’s Office
Your Majesty Queen Elizabeth II
At the end of this letter I request Your Majesty make an intervention at the University of Cambridge.
Also at the end of the letter I explain the relevance of being of Your Majesty the burden of an intervention.
The reasons that support my request are shown in the sequence of facts presented ahead.
Quantum Mechanics-(QM) is the most accurate theory of the Physics of the whole times.
In the beginning of the 20th Century when the physicists begun to
develop the QM, there was a duel between two of the most important
quantum theorists: Heisenberg and Schrödinger.
The Heisenberg’s thought on what is the meaning of QM can be understood by his famous sentence: “What we observe is not nature itself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning”.
The method of questioning preconized by Heisenberg was do not
propose conjectures. Instead of, a theory must be developed via the
But Schrödinger had the suspicion that the discovery of the true
laws of the Nature in the atomic level requires some unavoidable
conjectures. And therefore from the Schrödinger’s viewpoint the
Heisenberg method is inefficient for the discovery of the true laws of
the atomic world.
The main aim of Schrödinger was to keep the Kantian causality
principle in the development of QM. He believed that any physical effect
must have a physical cause. So, one among the conjectures proposed by
Schrödinger was the helical trajectory of the electron. He discovered
that such helical trajectory exists in the Dirac’s equation of the
electron, and so in his opinion the development of QM would have to be
done by considering the helical trajectory, because by this way it would
be possible to save the Kantian causality in the mathematical formalism
for the QM.
Unlike, Heisenberg had the opinion that it is impossible to
conciliate some phenomena in the atomic level with the Kantian
causality, and so the helical trajectory itself could not save the
causality, and therefore the helical trajectory was superfluous and an
unacceptable “metaphysical” conjecture, and the QM could not be
developed from that way. In Physics, metaphysical concepts are those
ones which follow the Kantian causality.
The quantum theorists decided to adopt the Heisenberg’s method of
questioning. The physicist Max Born proposed a mathematical formalism
which supplied to QM its statistical background (known as wave function)
and suppressed the Kantian causality for some phenomena, while Louis de
Broglie proposed the principle according to which the matter has a
property known as duality wave-particle. And Niels Bohr proposed the
fundamental principle which tries to supply philosophical coherence to
the duality, known as Principle of Complementarity (in some measurements
a particle exhibits its wave feature, and in other sort of measurements
it exhibits its corpuscular feature, but it can never exhibit both the
wave and corpuscular features at the same time, during a measurement).
In order to understand the importance of the Principle of
Complementarity for the QM, in his book on the Einstein’s life the
physicist Abraham Pais wrote about Bohr: “…his concept of
complementarity (which provides the philosophical underpinning for
quantum theory) qualifies him as one of the twentieth century's greatest
This philosophical interpretation of QM is known as Copenhagen Interpretation, and it was established between 1925 and 1927.
Schrödinger became deeply depressed with development of QM by
statistical laws, and he decided to abandon the Theoretical Physics,
going to work in the branch of Biology.
Some years after 1927, there was a meeting between Heisenberg and
a female Kantian philosopher, and she said to him that, in spite of
some atomic phenomena occur via statistical laws, however probably it
is possible to find physical causes for the statistical behavior, and by
this way the Kantian causality would be saved. But Heisenberg struck a
mortal blow in her hope. And he told her why: because when the Standard
Nuclear Physics was developed based on the laws of QM, the nuclear
theorists had discovered that it is impossible to find any physical
cause for the emission of alpha particles by the radioactive nuclei.
So, they concluded that the emission must be explained via statistical
laws, without any physical cause, and therefore they had concluded that
Heisenberg was right in rejecting the Kantian causality, since it is
impossible to find any physical cause for the emission of alpha
particles, by considering the Standard Nuclear Theory. And so
Heisenberg said to her that was impossible to save the Kantian
causality, and a waste of time to try to save it.
In the beginning of 1993 I have started to study the Quantum
Mechanics, in order to verify if could be possible to find a new
version for the theory, in the way pointed by Schrödinger. After all,
perhaps the method of questioning preconized by Heisenberg and adopted
by the quantum theorists could be inefficient for the discovery of the
laws of Nature in the atomic level, and so perhaps the Nature yields
phenomena through the Kantian causality, as supposed by Schrödinger.
I have developed my theory along more than 20 years, and in 2006 it was published in a book form by the Bäuu Institute and Press with the title “Quantum Ring Theory”- (QRT).
As my QRT was developed by considering the helical trajectory
proposed by Schrödinger, in my theory it is rejected as absurd Bohr’s
Complementarity. As supposed by Schrödinger, in my theory is considered
that the wave feature of the electron and other particles is caused by
the helical trajectory.
Therefore, according to my Quantum Ring Theory the pillar which
supplies philosophical coherence for the duality is wrong: Bohr’s
Complementarity is false, absurd, and must be rejected.
In the end of 1993 I have discovered a new nuclear model, which
works with some principles different of those used in the Standard
Nuclear Physics. In the page 186 of my book QRT is shown that the
emission of alpha particles by the radioactive nuclei has a physical
cause, in spite of the emission follows the Bernoulli’s statistical
distribution. Therefore Heisenberg was wrong by supposing that it is
impossible to find a physical cause for the emission of the alpha
particles. Ironically, he was right in another point: the physical
cause is impossible to be found if one tries to find it in the current
nuclear models proposed according to the laws established in Quantum
Mechanics and adopted in the development of the Standard Nuclear
But of course in 2006 (when the book QRT was published) my theory
could not be considered seriously by the scientific community. Because
at that time obviously nobody could suppose two highly improbable
things: 1) that the Standard Nuclear Physics could be wrong, and 2) that
my new nuclear model could have any chance to be right.
In 2008 I wrote the book “The Missed U-Turn, the duel Heisenberg vs Schrödinger”,
where It is explained for the lay reader the foundations of the Quantum
Ring Theory, and why some foundations of Quantum Mechanics are wrong,
and it is narrated the duel between Heisenberg and Schrödinger.
In 2010 I had submitted for publication by the Cambridge International Science Publishing my book “The Missed U-Turn”,
and in 2011 the book was accepted for publication. In 20 October 2011
the publisher Victor Riecansky has signed the Agreement (see it ahead):
Unfortunatelly after Victor Riecansky sign the Agreement, I had commented in the Andrea Rossi’s blog Journal of Nuclear Physics
that my new book would be published by the Camb. Int. Sci. Pub. And
after my advertising some physicists started threatening Victor, saying
that they would boycott the publishing house, and so he decided do not
accomplish the Agreement signed by him.
The boycott against the publication of my book The Missed U-Turn
by the Cambridge Int. Science Pub. is understandable, since up to 2010
the quantum theorists strongly believed that do not exist any
experimental evidences suggesting that QM was developed from any wrong
principle. They strongly believed it because some experiments which
debunk some laws of QM were simply rejected by the quantum physicists,
as for instance the experiment Conte-Pieralice published in 1999 by
Infinite Energy Magazine and the experiment made by Don Borghi and
published in 1993 by the American Journal of Physics (Conte-Pieralice
and Borghi experiments are different versions of the same experiment,
proving that neutrons are formed by fusion of protons and electrons at
low energy, which is impossible to occur according to the laws of QM).
In 1999 I sent a letter to Prof. Stephen Hawking, telling him about the
Conte-Pieralice experiment. But his secretary sent me a reply, telling a
lie: she said that Prof. Hawking was weakned, and could not send me a
reply. However one month later Hawking gave a lecture at an university,
and therefore Hawking simply did not want to hear about that experiment.
Hawking claims that “Not only does God play dice, but... he sometimes
throws them where they cannot be seen”… but when somebody tries to tell
him about an experiment proving that God does not play dice, he simply
refuses to take knowledge on the experiment. Later in 2002 I sent
emails to the Nobel Prizes in Physics A. Leggett and G.t’Hooft, telling
them about the Borghi’s experiment. Dr. Leggett sent me a reply saying
that it is not his field of expertise, and Dr. t’Hooft sent a reply
claiming that “the experimental evidence is phony”. So, in spite some
experiments were showing that some laws of QM are wrong, Hawking
continued to keep his dream of finding a Theory of Everything based on
the wrong foundations of QM, and Dr. t’Hooft continued to keep his dream
of finding a solution for some inconsistencies of QM, as tell us W. G.
Unruh in his review on the book “Quo Vadis Quantum Mechanics?” , published in 2005: “For
many, the locus is in the probabilistic nature at the heart of the
theory. Nature should surely, at some fundamental level, know what it is
doing. The photon, despite our inability to measure it, should know
where it is and how fast it is going. The papers by t'Hooft, Hiley, and
Smolin fall into this camp.”
Therefore, in spite of some experimental findings were pointing
to the theorists that there was need to retake the development of QM by
replacing the Heisenberg’s method of questioning by the Schrödinger’s
method, before 2010 the theorists in general were trying to avoid the
collapse of the Quantum Mechanics by simply neglecting the results of
some experiments which were showing to be wrong the Copenhagen
Interpretation. They successfully rejected the cold fusion phenomenon
from 1989 up to October 2014, when finally the cold fusion was
definitively confirmed (Andrea Rossi’s cold fusion reactor was tested by
nuclear physicists of three universities in Europe, with positive
But some experiments published after 2010 have changed the
panorama which up to that year allowed the quantum theorists to avoid
the collapse of the Quantum Mechanics. Those experiments show that
Heisenberg’s method of questioning has failed for the discovery of the
true laws of Nature for the atom and the sub-atomic particles. Let us
see the most important of them:
1- First experiment
Along 80 years the nuclear theorists have supposed that
even-even nuclei with equal number of protons and neutrons have
spherical shape, because it is impossible they may have a non-spherical
shape according to current nuclear models based on the Standard Nuclear
Physics. Unlike, in the page 137 of the book Quantum Ring Theory it is
shown that those nuclei have non-spherical shape, and so in 2006 the
book QRT was defying a dogma of 80 years of the Nuclear Physics.
In 2012 the journal Nature published the paper “How atomic nuclei cluster”,
describing experiments which have detected that even-even nuclei with
equal number of protons and neutrons have non-spherical shape, as
predicted correctly in QRT, and so a dogma of 80 years considered
untouchable by the nuclear theorists was proved be wrong.
So, Heisenberg had supposed wrongly that it is impossible to find
a physical cause for the emission of alpha particles by radioactive
nuclei because his conclusion was based on his wrong belief that the
Standard Nuclear Physics is correct.
Therefore, the most stronger Heisenberg’s argument for rejecting
the Kantian causality was invalidated by the paper published by Nature
in 2012, since the experiments proved that the Standard Model is wrong,
and by consequence we cannot use it as argument for the rejection of the
2- Second experiment
According to the nuclear model proposed in QRT, there is a z-axis
about which the protons and neutrons are symmetrically distributed in
the even-even nuclei. But according to the Standard Nuclear Physics it
is impossible the existence of the z-axis, and thereby obviously in the
years after 2006, (when my book was published), the nuclear physicists
have used to consider as impossible the new nuclear model proposed in
the book QRT.
Scientists of the Liverpool University have discovered that the nucleus
88Ra224 has pear shape, which is impossible by considering the Standard
Nuclear Physics. In 2013 they published in the journal Nature the paper “Studies of pear-shaped nuclei using accelerated radioactive beams”.
In order to explain the pear shape, Prof. Butler has proposed the
existence of the z-axis in the nuclei. However, as according to the
Standard Model the existence of the z-axis is impossible, the nuclear
physicist Gavin Smith of the University of Manchester, UK, said: “I
believe that this will eventually lead to results of much broader impact
than this experiment alone, with the possibility of placing constraints
on the standard model.”
3– Third experiment
The stronger blow against the Standard Nuclear Physics occurred
in October 2014, with the publication of the Lugano Report, which
confirmed the cold fusion phenomena: Rossi-Effect was confirmed by
experiments made by nuclear physicistsl of three universities of Europe,
published with the title “Observation of abundant heat production from a reactor device and of isotopic changes in the fuel”.
According to the Standard Model cold fusion is impossible to occur.
But as the Rossi-Effect was definitively confirmed in October 2014,
then the Standard Nuclear Physics is definitively wrong. Thereby the
Standard Nuclear Physics is definitively dead, and there is need to
develop a New Nuclear Physics. And the most important to know is:
obviously the New Nuclear Physics cannot be developed by using the
overcome and obsolete Heisenberg’s method of questioning, because 100
years the research have resulted into error.
4- Fourth experiment
The stronger blow against the Quantum Mechanics occurred in 2012, with the publication of the paper “Violation of Heisenberg's Measurement-Disturbance Relationship by Weak Measurements”, describing an experiment led by Aephraim Steinberg.
He discovered that a particle can have at the same time its wave
and corpuscular features, detected in the same measurement, and so it
proves that Bohr’s Complementarity is false.
Finally, other dogma of 100 years collapsed, bringing down the
most important support pillar of the philosophical coherence of the
The experiment also brings down the de Broglie’s interpretation
for the duality wave-particle, because a particle cannot have at the
same time the shape of wave and matter, because while the wave has wave
function, matter cannot have it. And a particle cannot, at the same
time, to have and do not have a wave function .
The unique way which survives for explaining the duality
wave-particle is that one pointed by Schrödinger, by considering that
wave feature of the particles is due to their helical trajectory. Other
mortal blow in the Heisenberg’s method of questioning.
5- Other experiments
There are many other experiments which are proving that the
Standard Nuclear Physics was not developed through the true laws
existing in the Nature, because some light nuclei have nuclear
properties impossible to be conciliated with any current nuclear model
based on the laws established in the Standard Nuclear Physics. For
instance, in 2009 the Physical Review Letters has published the paper “Atomic nucleus of beryllium is three times as large as normal due to halo”.
The experiment detected that Be11 has one neutron separated from the
core of a distance that is 3 times larger than allowed according to the
Standard Nuclear Physics, and therefore the binding of protons and
neutrons within the nuclei cannot be via the “strong force” as considered in the Standard Model. In short, if the Standard Model was right, Be11 could never exist. Other experiment was published in 2012 with the title “End of the magic: Shell model for beryllium isotopes invalidated”.
The experiment shows that the nucleus Be12 has a distribution of
neutrons impossible to exist according the the Standard Nuclear Physics.
And again, if the Standard Model was right, also Be12 could never exist.
But in spite of there are many other experiments impossible to be
conciliated with the theoretical models proposed according to the laws
of the Standard Model, here I have mentioned only those ones which are
the most striking.
Perhaps we may consider as understandable that before 2011 the quantum
physicists have supposed their attempt on saving the Quantum Mechanics
was successful. And that’s why some of them decided to boycott the
publication of my book The Missed U-Turn by the Cambridge International
But after 2010 any effort for saving the foundations of Quantum
Mechanics became absurd, because between 2011 and 2014 the principal
pillars of the theory were knocked down by experiments.
Incomprehensibly, the theorists continue trying to save the
Heisenberg’s method of questioning the Nature, as we realize by looking
what happened in the beginning of 2015, when I have published in
Amazon.com two books:
1- The Missed U-Turn, the duel Heisenberg vs Schrödinger
2- The Evolution of Physics, the duel Newton vs Descartes
The Nobel Prize in Physics Dr. Brian Josephson has posted in Amazon.com a review with the title “Bad Physics” for the book The Evolution of Physics,
and after that we had a long discussion, by exchanging a lot of
emails. A print of his replies in the inbox of my hotmail is shown
However, after a long discussion with Dr. Josephson, he realized that he
is unable to support his attempts for saving Quantum Mechanics with
acceptable and reasonable arguments. First he tried to save QM by using
himself a Bad Physics in his arguments. And finally he decided to stop
the discussion, and so he stopped sending me any reply. Unfortunately,
Instead of to adopt a honest attitude, by assuming that there is no way
to avoid the collapse of the Quantum Mechanics developed from the
Heisenberg’s method of questioning the Nature, Dr. Josephson preferred
to adopt the strategy of betraying the Scientific Method, refusing to
accept the new experiments published after 2010.
When our discussion was over, I have asked to Dr. Josephson the
grace of changing his review in Amazon.com, by writing a honest new
review, recognizing that my book is supported by strong experimental
evidences. But he did not attend my request. So, his intention is
obvious: to boycott my books, by suggesting to the Amazon costumers that
“Bad Physics” is published in my books.
Dr. Josephson has a strong personal interest in boycotting my
books. Because in University of Cambridge he is the Director of the Mind-Matter Unification Project,
where he uses the foundations of QM in his research. Then it is obvious
that it is not of his interest to recognize that QM was developed from
the wrong Heisenberg’s method of questioning (as my books are showing
and the experiments are proving) because that would be a confession that
he is doing his research through a wrong and surpassed way of research,
by keeping the wrong Heisenberg’s method, and therefore he is using an
overcome version of Quantum Mechanics for developing his scientific
I have sent a series of emails to the physicists of the
University of Cambridge, in order to show them the need of replacing the
Heisenberg’s method of questioning by the method proposed by
Schrödinger, and to retake the development of a New Quantum Mechanics,
in the way pointed by Schrödinger. But some physicists have considered
my effort as harassment, as Dr. Siddharth S. Saxena, who sent me the
Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 00:44:48 +0100
Subject: Re: Collapse of Heisenberg’s Uncertainty and Bohr’s Complementarity
To: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com
I have already asked you to remove you from my mailing list and i you
continue to harras me by sending these continuious unwanted messages. i
am now reporting you to polish police for harassment formally.
Dr. Siddharth S. Saxena
Quantum Matter Group Chairman, Cambridge
Cavendish Laboratory Central Asia Forum
University of Cambridge Jesus College,
Cambridge CB3 0HE Cambridge CB5 8BL
United Kingdom United Kingdom
As we realize, some physicists of the University of Cambridge
consider themselves as victim of harassment, because they continue to
develop their researches by keeping the foundations of Quantum
Mechanics, in spite of they know that many experiments are proving that
some of the foundations are wrong. But they do not want someone point
out to them that their method of research does not make sense.
So, some scientists wish nobody remember them that the efficiency
of the Heisenberg’s method, which along 100 years the scientific
community believed to be successful, was finally debunked by a series of
experiments after 2010. These scientists block their minds like those
hysterical patients of Freud, blocking their minds when some tragic
event destroys the deeper meaning of their life, without which their
lives no longer have meaning.
Only Freud can explain why, after 2010, some physicists are
desperately trying to save the outdated Quantum Mechanics developed
through the obsolete Heisenberg’s method.
Finally let me tell the reason why I sent this letter to Your Majesty.
According to its Homepage, the Mission of the University of Cambridge is the following:
“The mission of the University of Cambridge is to contribute to
society through the pursuit of education, learning, and research at the highest international levels of excellence”
As shown here, experiments published after 2010 have shown that
Heisenberg’s method of questioning has failed in the research for the
discovery of the true Laws of Physics in the atomic level. This means
that the Heisenberg’s method, nowadays used in the universities
worldwide, cannot be considered anymore as the highest international
level of excellence , as before 2010 it was considered.
Therefore, there is need to replace the Heisenberg’s method by
the Schrödinger’s one, in order to discover the true laws, and to
develop a new updated version for a New Quantum Mechanics.
In the case the professors of Physics of the University of
Cambridge continue to teach to the students the Heisenberg’s method, the
university will be teaching to the students a surpassed method of
research, and thereby disagree to the Mission of the university (teach
to students the highest level of excellence). This will configure
fraudulent misrepresentation, and the University of Cambridge can be
processed in court by the students who feel themselves deceived by the
practice of quackery and ideological falsehood in the departments of
In order to avoid the possibility of such unpleasant situation,
the University of Cambridge must adopt a suitable slogan in order to
reconcile the Mission of the university with the highest level of excellence, as follows:
“Physics Department students are encouraged to contribute to the
effort of of Quantum Mechanics improvement, in order to develop a new
updated version attuned with the latest experimental findings”
as well as the subjects of the Queen must be loyal to the royal
crown, it is the duty of the Queen to look for the interests of Her
And the loyal subjects do not want their children be deceived in
universities, acquiring an outdated knowledge, belied by the latest
That’s why I request your Majesty to influence the decision of
Leszek Borysiewicz, Vice-Chancellor at University of Cambridge, to adopt
the slogan proposed by me, in order to update the scientific method of
investigation in the Physics Departments, by replacing the Heisenberg’s
method by the Schrodinger’s method.
God save the Queen…
… and hopefully the Queen saves the Quantum Mechanics