Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

· Home
· Forum
· Special Sections
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 35 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here


Hot Links

American Antigravity

AESOP Institute

Closeminded Science



Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

The Orion Proj.




Science Hobbyist

Tom Bearden's Page


Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
Alternative Energy News
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
FringeEnergy News
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
Energy21 YT Channel
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine
Find Jobs

Proven asymmetry of electric field foreseen in Quantum Ring Theory
Posted on Sunday, April 26, 2015 @ 13:59:13 GMT by vlad

Science WGUGLINSKI writes: According to current theories, the electric field of elementary particles as the electron and the proton is sherical, and therefore the electric field is symmetrical regarding to any axis crossing its center (symmetry in all directions)

According to Quantum Ring Theory, the elementary particles have non-spherical electric field, and therefore the electric fiedl has a symmetry only regarding the z-axis which crosses the center of the field. 
The electric field has not a spherical symmetry as considered up to now in current theories.

The electric field of the proton is shown in the figure ahead:


as the proton rotates chaotically, its electric field behaves as it were spherical, involving spherically the proton.
So, in normal conditions the electric field behaves as it were spherical, as considered in the current theories.

A new experiment has proven the asymmetry of the electric field:
Electromagnetic Radiation under Explicit Symmetry Breaking

In an email of April 13 2015 sent to me by the Nobel Prize Dr. Brian Josephson he said, concerning the paternity on the argument proposed in the page 137 of the book Quantum Ring Theory, and published later in the journal Nature, in 2012;

Subject: Re: please do not ask to Amazon
From: bdj10@cam.ac.uk
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:50:03 +0100
To: wladimirguglinski@hotmail.com

> On 12 Apr 2015, at 23:27, Wladimir wrote:
> > And the explanation in the page 137 of my book Quantum Ring Theory, published in 2006, is the same of that given by Dr. Freer, as we see ahead:

What Freer says is well known, so if what you say on p.137 is that same then you haven’t produced anything new. I’m not that familiar with the details in the case of nuclei, but the argument is the same as in the case of molecules, as follows, It is standard QM that molecules have a shape (as per the theory of the chemical bond, relating bonds to electron states which have definite orientations if s is non-zero), and you can on the basis of these oriented bonds produce a state where the whole molecule has a definite orientation. But having a definite orientation is not compatible with having definite angular momentum and that state is a superposition of states with different angular momenta. One of these, that with zero angular momentum, is spherically symmetrical (because of how angular momentum is defined in QM).

You can have a state that is spherically symmetrical and you can have a state with a definite orientation, but these are different states so there is no contradiction. I hope this clarifies things for you.


Brian D. Josephson
Emeritus Professor of Physics, University of Cambridge
Director, Mind–Matter Unification Project
Cavendish Laboratory, JJ Thomson Ave, Cambridge CB3 0HE, UK
WWW: http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bdj10
Tel. +44(0)1223 337260/337254

And my reply to Dr. Josephson:

One of the errors of the nuclear theorists is to suppose that atomic nuclei can be compared with molecules.
This is the reason why Nuclear Physics has so many unsolved puzzles.

When I have started to study Nuclear Physics, I had analysed the nuclear properties of atomic nuclei, and I arrived to the conclusion that the nuclei have two concentric fields.
The reason why the current nuclear models cannot solve many puzzles is because in the Standard Model it is considered that atomic nuclei have only one field.

As you know, cold fusion is impossible to occur, by considering the principles of the Standard Nuclear Physics.
And the reason is because in the Standard Model it is considered that all the nuclei have only one field, and it is spherical.
Well, by considering a spherical field, the Coulomb barrier has the same value in the whole directions, and therefore a nucleon (as a proton) cannot enter within the nucleus in the condicions of low pressure and low temperature as occurs in cold fusion.

According to my nuclear model, all the nuclei have non-spherical field, as shown ahead in the Figure 2:

In normal condictions, the yellow Coulomb field shown in the Fig. 2 has chaotic rotation, and so in average the Coulomb field of the nuclei behaves as it had a SPHERICAL shape.  This is the reason why in  normal conditions cold fusion cannot occur, because the Coulomb barrier behaves as a SPHERE.

But when a nucleus is aligned toward an external magnetic field (as occurs in the Rossi-Effect), the chaotic rotation of the nucleus stops, and the electric field of the nucleus takes the shape shown in the Figure 2 above, and so the Coulomb barrier is non-spherical.
 And so there are two points in the Coulomb barrier where the repulsion is weaker than in the normal condictions, and this is the reason why cold fusion is possible.

In my book Quantum Ring Theory I show that Gamow introduced a new puzzle in his solution when he tried to solve the puzzle on why the alpha particles exit the nucleus U238 with 4MeV, while the Coulomb barrier has 8MeV.

The nuclear theorists consider that cold fusion is impossible to occur because they use to suppose that Gamow theory is correct.
If Gamow theory was correct, the cold fusion would be indeed impossible to occur, and Andrea Rossi would never succeed to discover his Rossi-Effect, because the Rossi-Effect would be impossible to occur.
But Gamow theory is wrong, and this is the reason why cold fusion is possible.

Dr. Josephson,
you are familiar to the properties of molecules, and so you suppose that what is applied to molecules can be applied to nuclei. The nuclear theorists also believe it.
if that was true, the nuclear theorists would be able to find a nuclear model capable to explain all the nuclear properties. 
But after a century of research they did never succeed to find a nuclear model capable to explain all the nuclear properties of the whole nuclei, because they are starting from the wrong assumption that some laws that rule the behavior of the molecules can be applied to the nuclei.

Several nuclear models were proposed, and no one among them is successful.
A nuclear model X explains some properties of a nucleus A, but it fails to explain other nuclear properties of that same nucleus A.
And a model Y explains some properties of the nucleus C, but it fails to explains the properties of other nucleus D.

And if the nuclear theorists continue in such way of investigation, they will never succeed to find a satisfactory nuclear model, and they will never succeed to explain nor the Rossi-Effect and neither the cold fusion phenomena in general.




Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Science
· News by vlad

Most read story about Science:
100 miles on 4 ounces of water?

Article Rating
Average Score: 1
Votes: 1

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Very Good


 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly

"Proven asymmetry of electric field foreseen in Quantum Ring Theory" | Login/Create an Account | 0 comments
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register


All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.