ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 224 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

AESOP Institute

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

The Orion Proj.

Panacea-BOCAF

QVac_Eng

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

Tom Bearden's Page

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
Alternative Energy News
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
FringeEnergy News
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
Energy21 YT Channel
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine
Find Jobs

Conjectures required by Rossi's cold fusion
Posted on Saturday, November 12, 2011 @ 18:18:30 GMT by vlad

Science WGUGLINSKI writes: “I dont make conjectures”, said Newton.

This is the motto of science, and the physicists follow this slogan.

It was possible for Newton do not make conjectures. Because for the discoveries of the macroscopic world, made by Newton, there was no need to make conjectures. Because he was able to test, with experiments, any conjecture before to propose it in books. In another words, Newton was able to test the conjectures.


Today the physicists follow Newton slogan, and they developed Quantum Mechanics without conjectures. Such procedure was imposed by Heisenberg. For instance, the helical trajectory (zitterbewegung) should be a conjecture capable to give a different intepretation for the duality wave-particle, proposed by de Broglie (he proposed that matter has the property of duality). If we interpret that duality is caused by the helical trajectory, there is no need to consider that matter is wave-particle, as de Broglie proposed.

Schrödinger tried to give another interpretation for the duality, by considering the helical trajectory. Heisenberg did not accept that conjecture. And Schrödinger lost the dispute: the conjecture of helical trajectory was not accepted in Physics.

If Schrödinger should have won the dispute, today we would have a New Physics, different of present Quantum Mechanics.

The duel Heisenberg vs Schrödinger is described in my book The Missed U-Turn, the duel Heisenberg versus Schrödinger – from Newton to Rossi’s eCat”, to be published in London in 2012.

The first man to violate the Newton’s slogan was Einstein. He realized that it was impossible to explain the results of Michelson-Morley experiment without conjectures. So, he asked forgiveness to Newton, and did conjectures. That’s why he replaced the Euclidian space considered by Newton, and proposed the space-time adopted in the Relativity.

So, the question: what would have happened if Einstein had not existed?
Well, then the Relativity would not exist in the present days. But of course the physicists would have developed an alternative theory, similar to what they did in the case of Quantum Mechanics.

The alternative theory (which would exist if Einstein should not have made the conjectures addopted in the Relativity) would have to be developed by considering the mathematics only, as was made in the case of Quantum Mechanics.

Happily, Einstein proposed an experiment so that to test his conjecture. And the experiment showed that his conjecture was right: the space has a curvature about the Sun, the space is not Euclidian.

But the challenge faced by Einstein was easier than to make conjectures in the micro-world. In the begginning of the development of Quantum Mechanics the physicists tried to make some conjectures, by addopting physical models. But they discovered that it was impossible (with the knowledge available at that time) to discover physical models for the atom. That’s why they gave up, and developed Quantum Mechanics without conjectures. Such procedure is known as the method of simplicity, adopted in science.

But suppose that the space has dilation/contraction into the electrosphere of the atoms, similar to the contraction/expansion adopted by Einstein in the case of the Relativity, which he named space-time.

Well, in this case Quantum Mechanics cannot be entirelly correct, because the conjecture of space dilation within the electrosphere was not considered in the development of the theory. In another words, that would mean that Quantum Mechanics is incomplete. In spite of it works well, and it gives good predictions (because it is possible to develop a theory by considering only the mathematics, by neglecting some fundamental laws that do not work in the level in which Quantum Mechanics was developed).

Sure such theory will work until a certain level only.

But probably it will fail in a deeper level (that’s why Quantum Mechanics cannot explain cold fusion, because it is a phenomenon which occurs in a deeper level which requires news laws not considered in Quantum Mechanics).

And suppose that within the atom, within the nucleus (and within the elementary particles in general) there are physical phenomena not considered in Quantum Mechanics.

Well, then the theory will be further away from the true reality that exists in nature.

The theory will not be able to explain phenomena that occur in a deeper level than that considered for the development of Quantum Mechanics, as occurs in Rossi’s cold fusion experiment.

This is the situation today. Rossi’s cold fusion is suggesting that Quantum Mechanics is incomplete. Probably there are mechanisms existing within the atom, within the nucleus, within the elementary particles, and those mechanisms are not considered in Quantum Mechanics.

There is need to make conjectures, as Einstein did when he faced the crisis opened by the Michelson-Morley experiment.

The crisis today is opened by two experiments: the LHC experiments, which did not detected the particles predicted by Supersymmetry and neither the boson of Higgs, and the cold fusion Rossi’s experiment.

Yes, there is a crisis, like there was a crisis when Einstein faced the puzzle of Michelson-Morley experiment. And in that age, like happens today, the community of physicists tried do not accept Einstein’s conjectures. They simply ignored the Michelson-Morley experiment, as they try today to ignore Rossi’s eCat. In the end of the 19th Century they simply believed that a New Physics was not necessary, because conjectures was not accepted.
Einstein showed the most physicists were wrong. He proposed a New Physics, developed by conjectures, and it was confirmed by experiments.

Today the experiments in the LHC and the Rossi’s experiments are pointing out that there is need to introduce conjectures in Physics.
There is need a New Physics, as there was need in the end of the 19th Century.

The question is: what are the conjectures to be tested by experiments ?

Quantum Ring Theory proposes many conjectures. They must be tested, as Einstein theory was tested in 1919.

If the experiments confirm only 10% of the conjectures proposed in Quantum Ring Theory, we will have one of the most greatest revolutions of Theoretical Physics.


 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Science
· News by vlad


Most read story about Science:
100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


Article Rating
Average Score: 3.75
Votes: 4


Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"Conjectures required by Rossi's cold fusion" | Login/Create an Account | 6 comments | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

LENR "Cold Fusion" nano-magnetism phenomenon (Score: 1)
by vlad on Sunday, November 20, 2011 @ 19:06:46 GMT
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com
details to be revealed December 7th in NYC.

Based upon evidence verified by our network of scientific leaders, as well as a definitive explanation of the “mystery” behind how and why LENR works; we are announcing the credibility and feasibility of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction, often incorrectly labeled  ”Cold Fusion.”

Brian Ahern received his PhD in material science from MIT, holds 26 patents and was a senior scientist for 17 years in research and development at USAF Rome Lab at Hanscom Air Force Base. Ahern was the U.S. Air Force’s expert on nano-materials. Ahern has discovered the LENR phenomenon is occurring on the nanoscale and involves a formerly misunderstood and rarely explored attribute of nano-magnetism.

 Apparently, energy localization at the nano-scale circumvents the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics. Nature evolved to take advantage of these energy exchange mechanisms available only at this size scale (which is why ordered structures can be created from chaos, such as after the big bang.) This phenomenon was identified in 1996 as Oscillons in relation to Chaos Theory, but has never been clearly understood until now.

Ahern states ” In 1995 we made a major and fundamental discovery regarding nano-material properties. This almost completely unknown to most technologists. All materials processed within certain tolerances experience very different vibrational modes than all other aggregations of matter. IT PROVIDES A CONCISE EXPLANATION FOR THE BIOENERGETICS OBSERVED IN ALL ASPECTS OF NATURE.”...

Full article: http://citi5.org/launch/?p=1826 [citi5.org]



Einstein was a fraud! (Score: 1)
by Kadamose on Saturday, November 12, 2011 @ 19:19:56 GMT
(User Info | Send a Message)
Einstein was a zionist jew who plagiarized the work of others, including his own wife's!   But the only reason why the idiot physicist is still remembered today is because Relativity  is a blatant misdirection by the control system, namely by the Rothschilds.   At the end of the 19th century, physicists were very much involved and believed in the Aether - and many of those physicists attempted to tap into the Aether to better understand it.    Nikola Tesla was the one who acconplished this feat, and was going to share all his findings to the world.   The Rothschilds, however, hi-jacked Tesla's discoveries and discredited the man so that he could no longer do his experiments easily, and made him look like a crackpot.   But discrediting and writing Tesla out of the history books was not enough - somehow, they needed to eliminate all forms of the Aether from public knowledge, otherwise, it was only matter of time before another person like Tesla came around and found a way to bring the control system to a halt.   And this is why they deemed it necessary to create Relativity,  

This is what Tesla had to say about Einstein and his stupid theory:


Relativity is a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king ... its exponents are brilliant men but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists . [en.wikipedia.org]

I hold that space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can have no properties. It might as well be said that God has properties. He has not, but only attributes and these are of our own making. Of properties we can only speak when dealing with matter filling the space. To say that in the presence of large bodies space becomes curved is equivalent to stating that something can act upon nothing. I, for one, refuse to subscribe to such a view. [en.wikipedia.org]

...the relativity theory, by the way, is much older than its present proponents. It was advanced over 200 years ago by my illustrious countryman Ruđer Bošković, the great philosopher, who, notwithstanding other and multifold obligations, wrote a thousand volumes of excellent literature on a vast variety of subjects. Bošković dealt with relativity, including the so-called time-space continuum ...

If everyone would have listened to Tesla instead of the stupid. zionist douche-bag Einstein, we would be traveling the stars and harnessing the same power that the entire universe operates on. 

With that said, I will quote Tesla's best quote of all: "Never trust a jew!" - and so right he was.






Re: Conjectures required by Rossi's cold fusion (Score: 1)
by Bernie777 on Sunday, November 13, 2011 @ 14:48:31 GMT
(User Info | Send a Message)
WGUGLINSKI 

Thank you for the above article, I am not a scientist, the article helped me understand why so many scientists refuse to accept LENR and especially the work of Mr. Rossi.

Bernie Koppenhofer
bbck7@hotmail.com



 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.