ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 569 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

"Cold Fusion" (but not LENR) Claims Questioned
Posted on Tuesday, February 09, 2010 @ 22:36:46 UTC by vlad

Science Steven B. Krivit writes: Dear Readers,

We published Issue 34 of New Energy Times on Jan. 31. In it, we reveal how scientists at SRI International and MIT, claiming evidence for the theory of "cold fusion," have misled the public, their peers, the Department of Energy and the reviewers of the 2004 DoE LENR review.

Since NET34 published, we have received no response, let alone corrections, from any of the principal subjects of the story, Michael McKubre (SRI International), Peter Hagelstein (MIT and Naval Postgraduate School) and Vittorio Violante (ENEA Frascati). The three are members of an informal consortium that has collaborated on research, publications, intellectual property claims and shared in federally funded LENR research.


We have received a few interesting comments on our blog, and we welcome yours.

For your convenience, here is a summary of the meaning and implications of NET34:

1.  "24 MeV/4He" Does Not Exist
        Contrary to what the public has heard and believed, the
        purported best evidence for the theory of low-energy nuclear
        reactions as a "cold fusion" reaction, specifically
        the highly promoted claim of ~24 MeV/4He, does not exist.
2.  Helium-4 is Not Expected*
        Helium-4 is a rare product of D-D thermonuclear fusion. Its
        finding in LENR in significant quantities is inconsistent with
        thermonuclear fusion. Its promotion by the subgroup as
        evidence of D-D "cold fusion" is misleading.
3.  Only a Subgroup Is Responsible
        A subgroup of the LENR field comprising some of the most
        prominent leaders of the field (mostly Americans) is primarily
        responsible for causing this misperception.
4.  Other Potential Energetic Processes Discarded
        The subgroup misled the public into believing that excess
        heat and non-energetic helium-4 were the only confirmed
        evidence for LENR. This distracted the public from more
        closely analyzing why the D-D "cold fusion" hypothesis fell
        so short in explaining the many other observed phenomena
        in LENR.
5.  Experimental Evidence of LENR Is Strong
        The consequences of attempting to sell people and the U.S.
        government on the speculative, unsupported theory of
        "cold fusion" caused them to have less confidence in the
        very real and strong experimental evidence of LENR.
6.  LENR Progress Delayed
        The subgroup's efforts to promote its "cold fusion" theory
        have come at the expense of the acceptance and recognition
        of the entire LENR field.

 
NET34 contains these six articles:

1.  Editorial: An Incoherent Explanation of LENR
        (An expanded version of the four points listed above)
2. The Emergence of an Incoherent Explanation for D-D "Cold Fusion"
        (The feature story, 3,971 words, excluding the abstract)
3. Inexplicable D-D "Cold Fusion" Claims From Italy
        (How Italian researchers played a role)
4. U.S. Department of Energy 2004 LENR Review: The Inside Story
        (How American and Italian researchers attempted to spin the DoE)
5. Revisions to Previously Reported MeV/4He Values
          (Technical information)
6. A Tragic Event in LENR History
          (About a murder)

To view NET34 on the Web:

NET34:  http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2010/34/NET340.shtml
NET34 Slideshow: http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2010/34/4HeRetention-Slide1-100.shtml

Both documents are also available as printable PDF files:

NET34: http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2010/34/NET34.pdf
NET34 Slideshow: http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2010/34/NET34Slides-IncoherentExplanation.pdf
 
Let this be crystal clear: Although the LENR phenomenon may not be D-D "cold fusion," it is nuclear and provides hope for a new source of clean energy.

Steven B. Krivit
Editor, New Energy Times

* See blog comment by William Collis
Follow-up to New Energy Times Issue 34


 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Science
· News by vlad


Most read story about Science:
100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


""Cold Fusion" (but not LENR) Claims Questioned" | Login/Create an Account | 0 comments
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.