ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 216 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events
  • (August 12, 2026 - August 16, 2026) TeslaTech Annual Conference 2026

  • Hot Links
    Aetherometry

    American Antigravity

    Closeminded Science

    EarthTech

    ECW E-Cat World

    Innoplaza

    Integrity Research Institute

    New Energy Movement

    New Energy Times

    Panacea-BOCAF

    RexResearch

    Science Hobbyist

    T. Bearden Mirror Site

    USPTO

    Want to Know

    Other Info-Sources
    NE News Sites
    AER_Network
    E-Cat World
    NexusNewsfeed ZPE
    NE Discussion Groups
    Energetic Forum
    EMediaPress
    Energy Science Forum
    Free_Energy FB Group
    The KeelyNet Blog
    OverUnity Research
    Sarfatti_Physics
    Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
    Vortex (old Interact)
    Magazine Sites
    Electrifying Times (FB)
    ExtraOrdinary Technology
    IE Magazine
    New Energy Times

    Interesting Links

    Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
    SciTech Daily Review
    NEXUS Magazine

    Have we underestimated total oil reserves?
    Posted on Monday, June 16, 2008 @ 20:37:56 UTC by vlad

    General 11 June 2008/ From New Scientist Print Edition

    Black gold might not be as scarce as we thought. This week oil prices escalated to a record $139 per barrel, but that may partly be because the amount of available oil in known reserves has been significantly underestimated.

    So says Richard Pike, a former oil-industry adviser and chief executive of the UK Royal Society of Chemistry, who blames flawed statistical calculations.


    Oil companies produce a bell-shaped probability distribution for how much each oil reservoir might hold, and then quote as an indicator of the reservoir's capacity a figure they are 90 per cent certain they can exceed. When publishing a result for multiple reservoirs, they simply add up the figures for each one. And this is where the problem lies...

    More: Have we underestimated total oil reserves?

     
    Login
    Nickname

    Password

    Security Code: Security Code
    Type Security Code

    Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

    Related Links
    · More about General
    · News by vlad


    Most read story about General:
    Z machine melts diamond to puddle


    Article Rating
    Average Score: 5
    Votes: 1


    Please take a second and vote for this article:

    Excellent
    Very Good
    Good
    Regular
    Bad


    Options

     Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


    "Have we underestimated total oil reserves?" | Login/Create an Account | 5 comments | Search Discussion
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

    No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

    Re: Have we underestimated total oil reserves? (Score: 1)
    by malc on Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 00:25:53 UTC
    (User Info | Send a Message) http://web.ukonline.co.uk/mripley
    Well according to a ex-oil company geologist interviewed on Radio 4 a couple of years ago they have over estimated the quantity of oil to ensure that the price remains low.  He went into details (not statistical) about the quantities in the existing fields, new finds, sizes of new finds and alternate sources. If memory serves he stated that the likes of BP and Shell have over estimated by a factor of 2.

    Also note that OPEC is a cartel of countries and how do they control the amount of oil each country contributes, as a proportion, to the total sold. This is to ensure a "fair" (supposedly) distribution of income. Answer : you produce as much oil in proportion to your reserves! Well DUH!!! Hmmm maybe over estimating your reserves means you can get a higher proportion of the OPEC sales and thus higher income for your country.

    Be very wary of advisors right now stating we have enough oil. This will be a ploy to keep the "panic" rises in oil prices down.  My guess is we will be hearing about a lot of new sources of oil but actually no commercial drilling!!!



    Re: Have we underestimated total oil reserves? (Score: 1)
    by ElectroDynaCat on Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 10:43:28 UTC
    (User Info | Send a Message)
    Its not the amount of petroleum underground that's important. The deciding factor in any drilling decision is the estimate of the permiability of the rock that the petroleum is encased.

    For example, there's more petroleum in North Dakota and Montana than in all the Middle East. The problem: the Bakken Formation shale has a 5% permiabilty, that means the petroleum flows like molasses. Contrast this with the Ghawar in Arabia that has a 95% permiability.

    The oil is down there, but good luck trying to get it out. The very fact that someone is actually drilling down 3000 meters into the Bakken Shale tells us about desperation on the part of domestic drillers.

    There are about 50 wells in the Bakken, costing 5 million apiece to complete. The average cost of predicted production is estimated at $60  a barrel, not exactly a bargain when the Ghawar produces at a cost of $4.

    Sixty Dollars a barrel now seems to be the target production cost for any reserves left on the North American continent, including ANWAR,Canadian Tar Sands, or anything else approved for drilling in the U.S..

    There are about 200 million acres that the continental U.S. that are preapproved for drilling right now, but no one seems to want to take the reins. ANWAR itself is just a guess as to exactly what the true figures might be if drilling there is approved. ANWARs' value seems to be as a political football more than an actual reserve.

    A good way to lose your money in petroleum exploration is to invest without knowing all the facts. My guess is that high petroleum prices are here to stay. 








    Re: Have we underestimated total oil reserves? (Score: 1)
    by deatopmg on Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 14:20:19 UTC
    (User Info | Send a Message)
    Oil companies are forbidden by congress to drill in virtually any offshore area.  The known reserves below the north slope of Alaska already exceed all the oil in Saudi Arabia before pumping started and represent at least 200 yrs uS supply at the historical rate if increase.

    The problem is not the amount of oil available (there's plenty), it is the fear dread (by the politicians) that if the uS increases it's oil production the other producers will drop the dollar standard for oil and switch to the Euro.  Since the US dollar has no backing, it's only paper, the value of the dollar would then plummit and the US economy would be irrevically dammaged.  But this is going to happen sooner or later anyway bacause of the huge growing national debt and the paper dollar.



    Re: Have we underestimated total oil reserves? (Score: 1)
    by dobermanmacleod on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 @ 01:47:32 UTC
    (User Info | Send a Message)
    I suggest you watch the Google video "The Energy Non-Crisis."  A very credible speaker claims first hand knowledge of the discovery of the biggest North American oil reserve in history off the Alaskan coast (that was promptly classified as secret by the Bush administration).

    In other words, I would bet that America has the largest domestic oil reserves of any country on Earth!  Furthermore, the location of that classifed AK oil reserve is legal to drill without further legislation legalizing off shore oil drilling.

    Think I'm a kook-watch the video.  It'll blow your mind.



     

    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
    Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.