Anonymous writes: Anthony Craddock writes: New Tom Bearden Article on the demise of a Self-Powering Battery Inventor
A Curious Coincidence: Was it Suppression of the Self-Powering Battery?
T. E. Bearden/28 Nov. 2007
The Incident
An incident that occurred in the Charlotte Douglas International Airport in North Carolina earlier this month is at least a curious coincidence, or it may possibly even represent assassination and suppression of another highly important “energy from the vacuum” (EFTV) invention. At least such a possibility should be considered, and then if all the facts warrant questioning the autopsy finding of death from natural causes, the incident should be more deeply investigated.
The victim’s name was M. DeGeus. DeGeus was found slumped in his car in the long term parking area of the airport, totally unresponsive. He was rushed to the hospital, and was pronounced dead very quickly, according to http://www.WBTV.com
The resulting autopsy indicated heart failure, and thus concluded “death from natural causes”. Hence police are not investigating it any further, and they are not considering it as a possible homicide.
Some Background on the Victim and His Invention
DeGeus was in fact the inventor of a thin wafer-like material/device that somehow specially aligned the atoms or electron currents ongoing in that material, so that the wafer produced a constant amperage at a small voltage – continuous real power, or in other words a strange kind of “self-powering battery”. It is actually powered by the ongoing and continuous tremendous exchange of energy by the active vacuum with the charges of any material. This exchange is exceptionally powerful, and normally our electromagnetic systems and devices only use just a tiny bit of it.
But as is known in physics, even simple materials (such as a simple short piece of ordinary copper wire) have extraordinary symmetrical cross currents ongoing perpetually, even when no ordinary “net” current is flowing since normally there is no asymmetry. E.g., quoting Swann:
"Think of the
cables which carry the telephone current in the form of electrons. In the
absence of the current the electrons are moving in all directions. As many are
moving from left to right as are moving from right to left; and the nothingness
which is there is composed of two equal and opposite halves, about a million
million amperes per square centimeter in one direction, and a million million
amperes per square centimeter in the other direction. The telephone current
constitutes an upsetting of the balance to the extent of one hundredth of a
millionth of an ampere per square centimeter, or about one part in a hundred
million million million. Then if this one part in a hundred million million
million is at fault by one part in a thousand, we ring up the telephone company
and complain that the quality of the speech is faulty." [W.F.G. Swann,
Physics Today, June. 1951, p. 9.]
However, if by special alignment of atoms and basic
constituents one does provide
an EM asymmetry in this naturally occurring “opposing huge EM power currents”
always ongoing laterally in the matter itself, then a net lateral direct
current (real EM power) can be freely provided by that altered material at a
resulting voltage (indicating the asymmetry) because every charge in the
material is continually involved in an enormous energy reaction with its local
active vacuum.
This continual giant energy interaction of every charge with
the seething vacuum is already well-known in modern quantum field theory. E.g.,
quoting Aitchison:
"...the concept
of a 'single particle' actually breaks down in relativistic quantum field
theory with interactions, because the interactions between 'the particle' and
the vacuum fluctuations (or virtual quanta) cannot be ignored." [I. J.
R. Aitchison, "Nothing's Plenty: The Vacuum in Modern Quantum Field
Theory," Contemporary Physics, 26(4), 1985, p. 357.].
A Little Corroborating Information
Indeed, I found an obscure bit of information that seems
directly related to proving the concept. We urge other investigators to further
investigate this effect. Quoting:
“…infrared Tourmaline
is the only mineral to show permanent electricity on the earth and is also a
natural (non-manufactured) source of negative ions and far infrared (FIR) rays.
Around 1986, it was found in a research
station in Japan
that, even though tourmaline was broken down in smaller pieces, a positive and
a negative electrode existed on both ends of the crystal, and the electrodes
never disappeared unless tourmaline was boiled near 1000°C.
In addition, when the positive and the
negative electrodes of a tourmaline crystal were connected to each other, it
was proven to show low electricity of 0.06mA.”
We suspect that the vast new phenomena uncovered in
nanocrystalline research will also probably have similar “self-powering DC
battery” capabilities in some cases.
At any rate, altering the layering characteristics of the
wafer material used by DeGeus provides a broken symmetry in its usual
equal-and-opposite cross currents. This asymmetry results in the little DeGeus
solid state wafer pouring out a net
steady lateral DC current at a given steady voltage. In short, it
becomes a “perpetual battery” type of device, gating and pouring out steady and
directly usable net DC power, and fed by energy from the seething vacuum
reaction due to that organized broken symmetry.
Proposed Explanation of the
“Self-Powering Battery”
Physics already tells us that, when we have a broken
symmetry, then something previously virtual becomes observable. So when we have
a power supply using the normal proven asymmetry of opposite charges (its
dipolarity), it will be receiving input energy from the virtual state vacuum,
cohering it to quantum size, and emitting it as real, observable EM energy.
E.g., quoting Nobelist Lee:
“…the violation of
symmetry arises whenever what was thought to be a non-observable turns out to
be actually an observable.” [T. D. Lee, Particle Physics and
Introduction to Field Theory, Harwood Academy Publishers, Chur, New York,
and London, 1981, p. 181.]
DeGeus Wafers and the Purpose of his Planned Trip
DeGeus appears to have readily achieved different voltages
and currents (different levels of power) by grouping, multiple-layering, etc. –
much like connecting or grouping individual batteries. The novelty was that the
inventor had discovered how to build these wafers extremely cheaply – couple
bucks each for a small one, with an assembly of them for greater power just
requiring multiples of the basic cost.
He is believed to have been from a well-to-do European
family with significant assets in South America.
His family is reported to have claimed the body and officially tied up all his
assets, effects, records, etc. The legal
ongoings are likely to permanently suppress any and all technical lab notes,
descriptions, etc.
Unknown to the authorities investigating his death, DeGeus
was on his way to Europe to receive very
substantial funding to put his invention into mass production and marketing.
Importance of the DeGeus Invention
As an example of the importance of this probably-now-lost
“free energy from the vacuum” invention, consider an electric car with a much
smaller DeGeus wafer assembly “battery pack” using self-powering “batteries”
taking all their energy output continually from the seething vacuum. As can be
seen, suddenly one has eliminated the recharging of batteries for the electric
car, and is now using a “permanent, self-powering battery” instead. Thus one
has achieved the dream of a “self-powering electric auto”, taking all its input
energy cleanly from the active vacuum environment itself, without need of
burning physical fuel to run the car or recharge the battery. In short, a car
also without harmful emissions that damage and pollute the biosphere and
contribute to global warming.
Use of a larger DeGeus battery, together with an alternator,
would also produce a self-powering unit capable of powering the average home
with AC power. Many other applications are obvious, as is also the tremendous
impact of such a developed technology upon our present consumption of
hydrocarbon fuels, nuclear fuel rods, etc.
If Assassination, Explanation of How It
Was Done
So a question arises as to whether this was just a simple
“accidental” heart attack, or whether it could have been a very professional
assassination to suppress the inventor and his invention. While we cannot
definitively answer that question, we can explain exactly how such an
assassination could have been done, which would have given the victim a massive
heart attack or stroke or both, resulting in his death.
The standard method of assassination to provide a certified
autopsy report of “death by natural causes” is the little EM beam “shooter”
using the Venus ECCM technique – i.e., warping of its wavefront – to destroy
the body’s control of its heartbeat. There are two basic sizes: One is about
the size of a dime-store pocketbook, and has an effective range of something
like 30 feet or so. The other is the size of a bazooka (shoulder-held rocket
launcher) and its beam is effective at a range of about 200 feet or so. It also
is often used with infrared sighting, to fire through a wall at a person (say,
in a room on the second floor) by aiming at his infrared change and signature
detected outside the building.
A person struck by this Venus-technique warped wavefront
beam has a sudden interruption of all control of his heartbeat, and so his
heart goes into instant, uncontrolled, and violent fibrillation. Exposure to
the main beam for 10 seconds or more is almost certain to result in death of
the individual, by a resulting massive heart failure, stroke, or both.
My colleague Ken Moore and I were struck with just such a
beam from a small Venus beam shooter, in the inside breast coatpocket of the
assassin, in a restaurant here in Huntsville
several years ago. We both felt the beam and the instant fibrillation. I
personally saw the assassin, about 20 feet away from us and well-dressed in
suit and tie, pull back his coat front and point that book-sized shooter at us.
Fortunately we were seated right beside the emergency exit from the dining
room, and I knew about Venus technique shooters and their drastic effects. So
we just immediately jumped right through that exit, setting off all the alarms,
but getting out of the beam in just a few seconds. So we lived to tell the
tale.
If this were indeed used in the DeGeus death case, it would
have been very simple for the assassin to simply approach him while he was
still sitting in his just-parked car, hit him with the beam and hold it on him
for, say, 30 seconds to a minute, then close his coat and simply walk away. And
no one would have been the wiser, till the victim was found by someone in his
car, either dead or dying.
There is the information for the reader’s review. The reader
will have to make up his own mind as to what probably really happened, and whether
it was truly an act of nature (a normal heart attack) or a deliberately induced
heart failure (an assassination using the standard Venus shooter).
Other Similar Incidents
There are of course other incidents similar to this. Stan
Meyer, a well-known inventor who apparently got his watergas working well,
rushed from a restaurant and shouted “They’re killing me!” (Some reports stated
he shouted “They’re poisoning me”), and then collapsed and died. Simply Google
on the web, for many articles on Stan Meyer, his invention, the threats to his
life, and his strange death.
An Australian researcher and friend of mine also had a
colleague who was assassinated in an upstairs room by a shot from the street
below, using the larger bazooka-sized Venus shooter. The other persons there
actually observed the assassin load the bazooka-shaped shooter back into his
vehicle and speed away.
In Conclusion
All we can state for certain is that (1) lots of inventors
of successful watergas, self-powering systems, etc. have been severely warned
or in some cases killed. (2) Many other “free energy from the active medium”
inventors have been threatened, bought out, or killed – or experienced a
mysterious death (we tell neophytes to be careful, else one can have a “sudden
suicide” on one’s way to the supermarket!) (3) The Venus electronic
countermeasures technique is well-known and established. (4) I have personally
experienced just such an assassination attempt, with my good friend Lieutenant
Colonel (retired) Ken Moore with me and also experiencing the weapon effects
and our very rapid escape in the nick of time. So I have a corroborating
witness.
Nonetheless, the interested reader will have to take it from
there and draw his or her own conclusions about the DeGeus incident. Was it
just a curious natural heart attack, or was it a deliberate assassination?
Hopefully time will tell.
Source:
Suppression of the Self-Powering Battery?
==================
Also, if you are ordering Tom Bearden DVDs or books as Holiday Season Gifts, we suggest you order as soon as possible to beat the rush.
http://www.cheniere.org/sales/online-store.htm
Regards
Tony Craddock
Web Administrator
The Tom Bearden Website
www.cheniere.org