 |
There are currently, 144 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
| |
|  |
OPEN LETTER TO GOVERNOR SYMINGTON AND JAMES FOX
Posted on Saturday, November 17, 2007 @ 20:54:25 UTC by vlad
|
|
THE DISCLOSURE PROJECT/ 14 November 2007
STEVEN M. GREER MD, DIRECTOR
Dear Governor Symington and Mr. Fox,
Congratulations on an excellent press conference on Monday. We are heartened to see the process of Disclosure continuing and that some of the witnesses and materials brought forward by The Disclosure Project (www.DisclosureProject.org) are continuing to reach the public.
Regarding the request for a government/civilian panel to investigate the UFO matter, while we appreciate your laudable purpose in making this request, we are concerned about the unintended strategic consequences of such a process. To wit:
> It is important to realize that powerful and well-funded unacknowledged special access projects (USAPs) within sectors of the US and other governments, and working largely through ‘work for others’ contracts with private institutes and corporations, have already been investigating the UFO/ET matter for decades.
> These projects are rogue, unconstitutional and transnational in nature. In briefings that I conducted personally for CIA Director R. James Woolsey, Defense Intelligence Agency Director General Patrick Hughes, the Director of Intelligence, Joint Staff (J2) and senior members of key Congressional committees (Senate Intelligence Committee, House Government Oversight committee, etc.) among others, it was made clear that the chain of command has been subverted. Even after providing current project code names and numbers to J2, and after he subsequently located one of these USAPs within the Pentagon and demanded to be ‘read into’ (or briefed) on the operation, this Admiral informed us that he was denied access to these projects.
> The science and technology behind these ET vehicles have been studied since at least the 1940’s and have been largely understood and reproduced. Their energy and propulsion systems, once disclosed, would eliminate the need for oil, gas, coal, nuclear power, public utilities and so forth. Many UFO sightings are, in fact, of these advanced aircraft which have been developed by Lockheed Martin, Northrup Grumman, SAIC and other military contractors and were operational by the late 1950s.
> Importantly, in 1969 the Condon Committee at the University of Colorado, a panel much like what you are recommending, became a fraud perpetrated on the public, and its chairman, Dr. Condon, was a secret, unacknowledged CIA asset (after briefing CIA Director Woolsey and making a FOIA request, we obtained a CIA document that establishes this fact). Dr. Robert Wood, then of McDonnel Douglas Aerospace, was involved with the Condon Committee and discovered that Dr. Condon was sanitizing any credible evidence from the report and even withheld such evidence from other panel members (see www.DisclosureProject.org witness testimony by Dr. Wood). When Dr. Wood challenged Dr. Condon on this behavior, Dr. Condon contacted Mr. McDonnel directly and attempted to get Dr. Wood fired. Any such committee today would most likely be a similar corrupt hoax and would seriously set-back Disclosure and only deepen the cover-up.
> In light of the above, we recommend a strategy to have open, secrecy-free hearings before a relevant Congressional committee, such as the House Government Oversight Subcommittee for domestic affairs, chaired by UFO-observer Rep. Dennis Kucinich, or some other committee headed by a similarly honest and trustworthy chairperson. Alternatively, a hearing by the UN or the World Court would be an acceptable venue.
> Importantly, since The Disclosure Project now has over 400 military, government, corporate and intelligence witnesses from around the world, as well as corroborating official documents and project code numbers and names, such a pool of witnesses testifying before an open, televised hearing would assure honest, real-time Disclosure. This process, so long as open and conducted by an honest chairperson, would be much less likely to be corrupted than a government panel investigation.
I wish you great success in your important work towards disclosing the truth about UFOs and wish to assure you that all of us at The Disclosure Project stand ready to assist you and this process in every way we can. Please feel free to contact me at any time to discuss this matter further.
Best always,
Steven M. Greer MD Director The Disclosure Project
|
| |
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
| |
Average Score: 4.33 Votes: 3

| |
|
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register |
|
Re: OPEN LETTER TO GOVERNOR SYMINGTON AND JAMES FOX (Score: 1) by RBM on Sunday, November 18, 2007 @ 09:29:04 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) | Well guys (Kadamose and nanotech), and all others, how much progress do you think will be made ?
I measure progress in terms of a significant impact on my daily wage-slave life.
Too high a bar ??
|
|
|
Re: OPEN LETTER TO GOVERNOR SYMINGTON AND JAMES FOX (Score: 1) by trelayne on Sunday, November 18, 2007 @ 19:27:22 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) | Dr. Greer,
I can understand that you must feel left out. But clearly, CFi and Mr.Fox are not interested in joining forces with a new ager such as yourself. It would gravely discredit their efforts. I see that your press release had been released on the PRnewswire soon after the press conference in an attempt to ride their wave and bring attention to your tainted effort. That was simply distasteful and points to your desperate attempt to feel relevant.
That being said, having congressional hearings is a great idea.
I am relieved that Leslie Kean has parted ways with you. Now the world can finally behold a serious disclosure effort that is rooted in reason and not the messiac mumblings of an egotist who wants complete control of any disclosure initiative.
Your conspiracy stories (which are as truthful as your assertions that you would build a new-energy device by 2004) are dangerous to any disclosure effort. The most success will be achieved by a conservative stance on the UFO phenomenon (i.e. not speculating their origins). So please stick to your own effort, and may the most credible witnesses in your camp jump ship as soon as possible to the CFi camp).
Sincerely,
Raj
|
|
|
|
|