ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 580 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events
  • (June 24, 2026 - June 28, 2026) 2026 ESTC CONFERENCE

  • Hot Links
    Aetherometry

    American Antigravity

    Closeminded Science

    EarthTech

    ECW E-Cat World

    Innoplaza

    Integrity Research Institute

    New Energy Movement

    New Energy Times

    Panacea-BOCAF

    RexResearch

    Science Hobbyist

    T. Bearden Mirror Site

    USPTO

    Want to Know

    Other Info-Sources
    NE News Sites
    AER_Network
    E-Cat World
    NexusNewsfeed ZPE
    NE Discussion Groups
    Energetic Forum
    EMediaPress
    Energy Science Forum
    Free_Energy FB Group
    The KeelyNet Blog
    OverUnity Research
    Sarfatti_Physics
    Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
    Vortex (old Interact)
    Magazine Sites
    Electrifying Times (FB)
    ExtraOrdinary Technology
    IE Magazine
    New Energy Times

    Interesting Links

    Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
    SciTech Daily Review
    NEXUS Magazine

    Site of the month: Common Sense Science
    Posted on Sunday, April 29, 2007 @ 22:23:41 UTC by vlad

    Science What is Common Sense Science (CSS)?

    Common Sense Science is a body of theory regarding matter and forces that describes the physical world using geometric models, absolute time and Galilean space in a way that strives to be consistent with experimental observations and free of internal contradictions. The foundational principles of CSS theory are based upon the law of cause and effect and the assertion that the universe and all natural phenomena are fundamentally electrical in character.



    These principles have led to the derivation of a new universal force law that applies on all scales ranging from the sub-atomic to the cosmic domain and to the development of physical models for elementary particles, nuclei, atoms and molecules. Although the new models are novel and in many ways strikingly different from the standard model of elementary particles, they have an inherent simplicity and physical form that appeals to common sense. One reason for this is because the CSS models can be visualized and analyzed using the math and physics commonly found to hold true at laboratory scales.

    Why is CSS Needed?

    The Scientific Method
    Progress in understanding the physical world accelerated when men like Galileo, Newton, Faraday and Maxwell began to study nature and look for order and principles to explain what they saw. The great scientists put aside their biased opinions and agreed on an objective standard of validity. They sought for truth, and insisted that a scientific assertion must be in full agreement with the observed and measured facts. Scientific propositions also had to be consistent with all the known laws of physics.

    The Electromagnetic Nature of the Universe
    A hundred years ago most scientists would were of the opinion that the universe was primarily electromagnetic in nature. This was due to the astounding successes that had been made in the field of electrodynamics by Ampere, Faraday, Gauss, Maxwell and others in explaining many natural phenomena.

    New Scientific Theories Introduced
    At the turn of the century, significant new phenomena such as blackbody radiation, the photoelectric effect, and the spectra of hydrogen were discovered. These phenomena were discovered over such a short period of time that scientists of the day were not able to adequately adapt classical electromagnetic theory to incorporate them. Instead, new theories such as relativity theory, quantum mechanics, the theory of the atom, and elementary particle theory were introduced to supplement what could not be explained by electromagnetic theory.

    Problems With the New Scientific Theories
    Interestingly, the new theories didn't immediately resolve the difficulties either. In fact they introduced new problems and inconsistencies of their own. For example:
    1. Physical models of matter were replaced with mathematical equations.

    2. Postulates were adopted that were known to violate the empirical laws of electrodynamics.
    3. Cause and effect relationships were replaced with random chance events.
    4. Force laws with no empirical basis were postulated in order to make the new theories of matter work.

    Despite these issues, the new theories took hold and relativity theory and quantum mechanics, as embodied by the standard model of elementary particles, are generally touted as among the most successful theories of the century.

    Common Sense Science (CSS) Emerges
    At the end of the 20th century, Barnes, Bergman, Lucas and others began to build on the older classical work that had been largely abandoned nearly a hundred years earlier. Working outside the mainstream physics establishment, their common goal was to correct what they perceived as deficiencies in modern physics by reapplying what they deemed to be sound scientific methods in order to develop better fundamental theories of the elementary particles, atoms and the forces between these objects. By striving to maintain the principles of reality, causality and unity throughout their work, they hoped to bring "common sense" back to the field of physics. The expression "common sense", in this context, alludes to their belief that physics, even at the atomic scale, ought to be intuitive and consistent with the laws of physics that are commonly observed on laboratory scales.

    The Purpose of this Website
    It is now midway through the first decade of the 21st century and the CSS scientists believe they have come up with a sound basis to develop more credible models of matter that more effectively answer the big questions in physics and resolve the shortcomings they saw with the principle theories of modern physics. This site provides an overview of their work and seeks to demonstrate the reasons for their confidence in this new approach. We hope you will seriously investigate the CSS method and models, hold them up to rigorous scrutiny and ascertain for yourself if the approach yields scientific models that are consistent with scientific observations.

    Link: http://www.commonsensescience.org/

     
    Login
    Nickname

    Password

    Security Code: Security Code
    Type Security Code

    Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

    Related Links
    · More about Science
    · News by vlad


    Most read story about Science:
    100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


    Article Rating
    Average Score: 0
    Votes: 0

    Please take a second and vote for this article:

    Excellent
    Very Good
    Good
    Regular
    Bad


    Options

     Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


    "Site of the month: Common Sense Science" | Login/Create an Account | 4 comments | Search Discussion
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

    No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

    Re: Site of the month: Common Sense Science (Score: 1)
    by Mar1 on Monday, April 30, 2007 @ 20:12:33 UTC
    (User Info | Send a Message)
    Finally, an approach that really makes sense. I don’t understand why these views weren’t adopted earlier. How can you possibly state facts form mere suppositions, speculations and sheer imagination? There is nothing wrong with imagination, in fact it can be a very useful tool, but you can’t state something as fact until you have demonstrated it experimentally! What would happen if we conducted forensics in the same manner in which modern physics declare facts? I’ll tell you, we would have a lot of innocent folks behind bars. I believe this approach might be very successful, a large sector of the Correa’s theory in Aetherometry is dedicated to what they have termed mass – free ambipolar electric radiation or Tesla radiation which points to the exact thing CCS allures to only through different terminologies. The only difference between CCS and Aetherometry is that Aetherometry goes beyond its theory of mass – free ambipolar radiation to attempt to explain the origins of the electron. All I can say is that it is about time some one came up with something like this, maybe physics has a future after all.



     

    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
    Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.