Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

· Home
· Forum
· Special Sections
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 154 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

  • (June 9, 2021 - June 11, 2021) ICCF-23 online

  • Hot Links

    American Antigravity

    AESOP Institute

    Closeminded Science



    Integrity Research Institute

    New Energy Movement

    New Energy Times

    The Orion Proj.




    Science Hobbyist

    Tom Bearden's Page


    Want to Know

    Other Info-Sources
    NE News Sites
    Alternative Energy News
    E-Cat World
    NexusNewsfeed ZPE
    FringeEnergy News
    NE Discussion Groups
    Energetic Forum
    Energy21 YT Channel
    Energy Science Forum
    Free_Energy FB Group
    The KeelyNet Blog
    Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
    Vortex (old Interact)
    Magazine Sites
    Electrifying Times (FB)
    ExtraOrdinary Technology
    IE Magazine
    New Energy Times

    Interesting Links

    Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
    SciTech Daily Review
    NEXUS Magazine
    Find Jobs

    The nature of Heat
    Posted on Monday, May 29, 2006 @ 20:36:01 MST by vlad

    Science sams writes: What is Heat

    What you are about to read is something new and hereto unexplored. Science is based on observations. To put this science in perspective, we must approach understanding fundamental elements by observations and by the interpretations of motion of more complex matter.

    To postulate that there may exist a scientific or logical law that allows something to evolve from nothing as a theory, unscientific and completely unworkable in explaining evolution, is a wishful hypothetical of a supernatural concern. Understanding fundamental basic laws will make the universe self - evident.

    To explain what heat is; must come from knowing how heat and temperature differ, if we are to have a clear understanding how energy and matter are related. In order to understand the nature of heat, it is necessary to appreciate the concept that all matter consists of a coalescence of specific heat units. It is likewise necessary to envision the quantum heat unit as intrinsic and the single basic irreducible constituent of everything that has mass.

    Hence if we are to assume that "nothing" is not matter than heat must be referred to as containing mass, ergo we must support a logical and philosophical pursuit and pursue the heat unit to its source.
    As a consequence we may extrapolate the heat unit to be the ultimate particle of matter.

    Scientists over the years have come up with many hypotheses and tried to explain the difference between heat and temperature. One such hypothesis was suppositioned by Lavoisier. He suggested that heat might be a substance with mass, which he called caloric. But Lavoisier's idea was not supported by experimental observations, and scientists looked for otherways to explain heat.
    To better understand thermodynamics and lay a foundation why things happen, we must follow a physical trail of these minuscule matter structures.

    In defense of Lavoisier, for us to assume without proof this supposition, a phase for reasoned pursuit of the senses must be adopted, that will seek to establish standards of evidence. We may provide rational methods, techniques, evaluate ideas to the best of our abilities and try to create favorable conditions, consequently technical limitations may prevent complete confidence in some theories either because our instruments are inadequate, or because other areas can not provided us with supporting data. Ergo we may never physically witness the existence of these fundamental units. The improbability in perceiving microphenomena directly should not suggest that these phenomena are non-material.
    we have a clear ability to distinguish phase changes like a solid to leguid or to vapor but humans have limitations when the same properties are micro or irreducible elements as an unobservable phase.
    It is a formidable challenge to catch a minnow with a net designed for sharks.


    The heat of a mass is the aggregate of none binding and binding (specific) heat units. This we may define as the sum total of all the irreducible constituents in a mass and describe this as the temperature of a mass as that which determines the sensation of warmth or coldness felt. It is a common belief that there is a fixed amount of heat in the Greater universe, whenever specific units of common interest are concentrated they will create hot spots.
    In conclusion the structure of matter is a configuration of Potential Rest Energy (quantum heat units ) when combined form fundamental particles and particles when combined eventually form atoms.



    If heat is a causative factor of expansion, what is its specific structure?
    Does heat occupy space?
    How big is a heat unit?
    Are all irreducible units of equal thermal value?
    Do they exist as fluid like?

    The linchpin of the heat unit theory is, heat must consist of a few varying flavored irreducible constituents. A conceptual understanding of basic energy and the study of quantum heat units as to how they master the change of state, when we believe that heat can neither be created, nor destroyed. It can coalesce or disperse. Hence we may postulate the greater universe as a closed thermal structure.

    To explain what heat is; must come from a quantum unit theory. Which states that all matter is made up of irreducible elements called quantum thermal units.
    If the basics units are thermal hence all fundamental particles must likewise be thermal. We may postulate heat in all probabilities is the basic none-homogenous unit in the Greater Universe and assume that all more complex particles are an amalgamation of varying values. The senses seem to formulate evidence that heat and potential rest energy (pre) may be similar in function and in structure.
    We therefore need to assign unit measures to heat units to more clearly understand the relationships between fundamental particles and more complex matter.
    We may extrapolate from observations as to the percentage of observable baryon matter in the universe.and assume the greater universe consists of a few irreducible varying quantum values.


    A Quantum Heat Theory must offer reasons and show cause, why heat generates expansion in both molecules and in more complex matter.
    The coalescence of specific heat units will impose value change in fmp configuration, the act of forming more complex matter.
    The 2nd law of thermodynamics presents an argument of evidence that varying fmp values generate propagation of more complex matter.

    One definition of expansion-- The act of amalgamating or the condition resulting from this act.


    Question - heat and PRE are these units analogous in value, structure and function?

    When we say this object (A) is hotter and this one (B) is colder, we are referring to that (A) has more coalesced specific heat units (hotter).

    Example, we believe that heat cannot be created nor destroyed but quick repetitive friction of two substances will cause an increase in temperature.

    What is the mechanism to explain this function?

    The Quantum Heat Theory must offer an explanation why heat can cause expansion in molecules and more complex matter.

    The quantum thermal unit rearrangement theory states-- No two quantum thermal units can share the same point in space.
    To thoroughly digest the quantum thermal unit rearrangement concept, we should first start with a proposition;
    What is the mechanism to explain the function and extrapolate a theory of a quantum thermal unit rearrangement. Like sound or water for QTUR propagation, a contactual contiguous fluid like medium, to fill the total volume is required.
    Sequentially vast quantities of quantum units are needed to simply fill this space.

    Let us posit a novel argument for general behavior and causation of these basic constituents.
    These varying PRE values eventually form baryonic particles and advance to more complex matter but do not increase their unit value* in respect to volume in space.
    Unit value* To define the term is to say. The unit cannot accrete more heat or increase its respective volume albeit through the coalescence of specific unit will increase the configured mass. These new binding units simply displace none binding (PRE?) units and resultantly claim that space. These specific particles initiate motion and thermal transference but their respective unit value or volume remains a constant.
    What we are witnessing is a local coalescence of binding particles or formation of baryonic matter, an increase of quantities of specific units in an expanding local region only.

    Hypothetically we may extrapolate, one cubic inch of space will contain a constant number of non - binding units. Likewise one cubic inch of space will contain a constant number of binding units inconsequential as to the type of matter the number of PRE units subject to flavor will remain constant.

    What is the mechanism to explain this function?
    Example, we believe that heat cannot be created nor destroyed but quick repetitive friction of two substances will cause an increase in temperature.

    Adding heat to a solid gradually dilutes the structure and influence "specific units" to increase their spacing (disperse). Any further continued injection of none binding heat units into the mass leads to gradual expansion (dispersion), eventually initiates a phase change.

    More on Dark Matter: http://ca.geocities.com/Samsade@rogers.com



    Security Code: Security Code
    Type Security Code

    Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

    Related Links
    · More about Science
    · News by vlad

    Most read story about Science:
    100 miles on 4 ounces of water?

    Article Rating
    Average Score: 5
    Votes: 2

    Please take a second and vote for this article:

    Very Good


     Printer Friendly Printer Friendly

    "The nature of Heat" | Login/Create an Account | 0 comments
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

    No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register


    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
    Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.