ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 192 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

Towards a new test of general relativity?
Posted on Sunday, March 26, 2006 @ 12:23:59 UTC by vlad

Science Hello all,

Tim Ventura of American Antigravity reported this week about this story: http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/GSP/SEM0L6OVGJE_0.html

"... Their experiment involves a ring of superconducting material rotating up to 6,500 times a minute (rpm). Superconductors are special materials that lose all electrical resistance at a certain temperature. Spinning superconductors produce a weak magnetic field, the so-called London moment.


The new experiment tests a conjecture by Tajmar and de Matos that explains the difference between high-precision mass measurements of Cooper-pairs (the current carriers in superconductors) and their prediction via quantum theory. They have discovered that this anomaly could be explained by the appearance of a gravitomagnetic field in the spinning superconductor (This effect has been named the Gravitomagnetic London Moment by analogy with its magnetic counterpart).

Small acceleration sensors placed at different locations close to the spinning superconductor, which has to be accelerated for the effect to be noticeable, recorded an acceleration field outside the superconductor that appears to be produced by gravitomagnetism. "This experiment is the gravitational analogue of Faraday's electromagnetic induction experiment in 1831. ..."

Now, according to my research, the key to controlling gravity is controlling the field energy of fundamental particles. Spinning their superconducting disk "increases" this internal energy, thereby increasing its mass. The superconducting disk simply gets heavier as reported. Now, inspired by Tim Ventura's (American Antigravity) information about the NAZI Bell Experiment, last year (2005), I decided to try a simple experiment. I managed to capture by photo what I call a "Diagravitic Effect": http://www.intalek.com/Index/Projects/Diagravitics/Diagravitics.htm

This simple experiment uses two counter-rotating disks, one stacked upon the other as shown in the Figure 1. The result of this experiment appears to show NOT an antigravitational force, but an opposing gravitational force, or what I call a Diagravitatic Force.

Its also interesting to note that a rotating disk produces what is commonly known as 1-axis "gimble-lock". However, the coupling of two counter-rotating disks causes this "gimble-lock" effect to completely vanish!

Bill

---
William S. Alek
Exploring Gravitational and Inertial Mass fluctuations,
Radiant Energy, and Temporal Anomalies
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/intalek

INTALEK, INC. PHONE/FAX: 219.924.2742
3506-43rd. Place EMAIL: mailto:wsalek01@intalek.com
Highland, IN 46322 USA HOME PAGE: http://www.intalek.com/
-------------------
[We also reported on this story, see "ESA funds Gravito-Magnetic research" on Mar 23 - Vlad]

TOWARDS A NEW TEST OF GENERAL RELATIVITY?, March 23
Scientists funded by the European Space Agency have measured the gravitational equivalent of a magnetic field for the first time in a laboratory. Under certain special conditions the effect is much larger than expected from general relativity and could help physicists to make a significant step towards the long-sought-after quantum theory of gravity.

Full story at http://www.physorg.com/news12054.html


 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Science
· News by vlad


Most read story about Science:
100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"Towards a new test of general relativity?" | Login/Create an Account | 1 comment | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: Towards a new test of general relativity? (Score: 1)
by Koen on Tuesday, October 04, 2011 @ 03:56:21 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://no.nl/tesla
One comment about GR:  Newton's theory predicts CORRECTLY the deflection angle of deflected sun-light during a solar eclipse.

Einstein stole GR from David Hilbert, then pretended that only GR leads to the right deflection angle. The problem was that Soldner's Newtonian calculation contained a mathematical error (forgot a factor 2 somewhere) therefore Soldner got the wrong answer initially. But after correcting this math error, the Newtonian theory works just as well for predicting the correct deflection angle.  This was the very reason Einstein did NOT get a Noble price for stealing GR from Hilbert and hiding the math error in Soldner's Newtonean calculation, because the Noble price committee was AWARE of these facts.

The zionist Jewish press, however, picked up Einstein's lies, and made him famous, turned fraud Einstein into a celebrity. Even today Einstein is known as the "scientist" who disproved Newton's theory of gravity, and who formulated GR "for the first time", but this is double wrong.

Source: http://www.jewishracism.com/SaintEinstein.htm  chapter 13.




 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.