ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 208 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Chava Energy

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

Energy Science

Energy21

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

Interstellar Technologies

JLN Labs

KeelyNet

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

The Orion Proj.

Panacea-BOCAF

QVac_Eng

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

Tom Bearden's Page

Unlimited electric energy

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
Alternative Energy News
KeelyNet_News
NextEnergyNews
PESWiki/News
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
Energy2000
Free_Energy
Greenglow
JLNLabs
KeelyNet
NuEnergy
OverUnity
Sarfatti_Physics
Sweet-VTA
Tapten
Tomorrow-energy
Vortex
Magazine Sites
Distributed Energy
Electrifying Times
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine
radioioAmbient

Tom Bearden on wireless transmission of energy and Blacklight Power
Posted on Tuesday, January 24, 2006 @ 22:15:18 EST by vlad

Science Posted by Leslie Pastor to the NEC Forum: Good Morning Tom,

Tom Valone [NEC] makes a very interesting comment regarding the explanation of the wireless transmission of energy.

All the Best,
Leslie R. Pastor




----- Original Message -----
From: Tom Bearden
To: 'Leslie R. Pastor'
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 12:32 PM
Subject: RE: Tom Valone: Wireless Transmisison of Electrical Energy: Tesla/Wardencliffe


Les,


Yes, Tom Valone is doing yeoman work in trying to sort it all out, and get at the underlying mechanisms.

I believe, e.g., that a very good case can be shown proving that Tesla was correct, and there are no transverse EM waves in space. Indeed, we already KNOW that there are no transverse FORCE FIELD waves in space; check the Feynman references and Jackson references and quotes I already pointed out, and point out in my paper on the errors and omissions in the CEM/EE Model.

The notion of force field waves in space involved the assumption of the presence of material ether throughout all space, which was falsified in 1887.

The notion that these "falsified" force field waves in space were also transverse waves in space originated well before the discovery of the electron, and of course predated the discovery by Drude of the electron gas.

When in the old days one received (observed) in a wire antenna an incoming wave from space, one did not and does not observe the wave itself. Instead, one observes the movement of the Drude electron gas, as a result of the interaction of that incoming wave with the electrons in the Drude gas.

Well, that's interesting. The Drude electrons are spinning, as we know today, and - if we do not push the analogy too far - the electron in the Drude gas may be interpreted as a gyroscope. We know today that the electrons are strenuously restrained longitudinally down the wire; in an average little circuit, the Drude gas electrons "migrate" longitudinally down the wire very slowly, usually a few centimeters per hour! The signal, however, races down (through space outside the conductor) at almost light speed. Suppose the force-free wave incoming from space interacts with a specific Drude electron, trying to push it longitudinally down the wire. That electron is repelled by all those electrons ahead of it, which is a very powerful blocking force. That "constrains" the spinning axis of the electron, insofar as longitudinal movement of the electron and its axes. Now, laterally in the wire, there are far fewer electrons repelling it. So the Drude electron precesses laterally along the radial cross section of the wire. It thus moves laterally to and fro (by its precession) much more rapidly than its tiny drift movement very slowly down the wire longitudinally.

The result is that in our instruments we do measure and observe these PRECESSION ELECTRON waves, and they are indeed transverse waves.

In the old days before the advent of knowledge of the electrons, they simply thought of the interior of the wire as being permeated by the material ether. And they thought of all surrounding space as also permeated by this universal material ether.

Hence - to them - what was "clearly" happening was that transverse ether waves in space impinged upon the wire antenna, shaking the ether inside it. So since their instruments measured (they thought) a transverse material ether shaking transversely inside the wire, then it mean that a transverse EM material ether wave from outside had entered the wire and our instruments had detected it.

And that was the total basis for the old transverse EM force field wave in space.

Note that a force field wave has matter as one of its components. So the transverse oscillating Drude electrons are indeed part (components) of a true transverse EM material wave inside the wire. That is not at all what is OUTSIDE the wire in matter-free space.

Further, the spin of the Drude electron cinches it. The fact that the longitudinally restrained electrons do precess laterally, and that lateral force field (material) waves are thus detected in the Drude electrons, proves that the incoming perturbation is longitudinal.

Hence Tesla was correct, and electrical engineering today is still wrong (they never changed a single equation to eliminate the old material ether, once that material ether was falsified in 1887).

In a strange sense, Whittaker's decomposition in 1903 and 1904 of the potential and the field respectively, shows that INSIDE THE ENVELOPE of a decomposed EM wave there are bidirectional longitudinal EM waves only!

In a sense, the envelope is involved because of the integration of the absorbing spinning Drude electrons, while it is clearly due to incoming EM longitudinal EM wave flows.


Best wishes,

Tom
=============

From: Leslie R. Pastor
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 2:07 PM
To: NEC-Forum
Cc: Tom Bearden
Subject: Tom Bearden answers Ken Rauen regarding the Blacklight process


While working on the MEG 'simplification' process procedure, I initiated a discussion with Tom Bearden regarding Ken Rauen's explanation of Dr. Randell Lee Mills', Blacklightpower [ http://www.blacklightpower.com ] process. While enjoying Ken Rauen's explanation, we delved deeper http://cheniere.org/correspondence/012206.htm and Tom decided to post it to his website.


All the Best,

Leslie R. Pastor
-------------------

On Blacklight Power see also the recent article in The Times (www.nj.com): Quantum leap in physics?


 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Science
· News by vlad


Most read story about Science:
100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"Tom Bearden on wireless transmission of energy and Blacklight Power" | Login/Create an Account | 3 comments | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: Tom Bearden answers Ken Rauen regarding the Blacklight process (Score: 1)
by vlad on Saturday, January 28, 2006 @ 17:37:20 EST
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com
Ken Rauen writes to the NEC forum: I am displeased with Tom Bearden's reply to my description of the Mills process.

It gets off to a bad start. "Sub-quantum" does not mean "virtual." The fractional quantum states are still quantized, and as such are still quantum energy transitions. Tom is distorting what I said. I did not say sub-quantum to mean it is not quantized. Randy merely extended the scale of quantization beyond what we call the ground state. Tom's sentence, "And a virtual electron, virtual atom, or whatever would normally 'radiate' except in the virtual state, subquantally," is a subversion of the topic and hijacks the argument. Tom is heading off in a direction that is just creating confusion. He is not adding any clarity.

If Tom has an unusual meaning for "virtual," he must explain it. "Virtual" is a term in use in science to mean simulated, as in computer programs, in order to model what Nature does.

From this disorienting start by Bearden, I am not even going to try to make sense out of the rest. He is muddying the waters, not clarifying them. Too bad people think he is really straightening things out. If others understand what he is saying, please translate, otherwise, I will just assess it as is.

Ken



Re: Tom Bearden on wireless transmission of energy and Blacklight Power (Score: 1)
by harold33 on Friday, June 25, 2010 @ 14:40:58 EDT
(User Info | Send a Message)
Wow thanks for such a useful article. Despite the fact that it is over 4 years old, it was still useful for me. I was searching for some information related to wireless transmission but I had found absolutely nothing about it on the internet. Maybe it is because this topic is no more actual and people have other ways of getting wireless connection. However I will read this one few times and try to understand the sense of this post. Thanks one more time for this informative article and keep publishing them in the nearest future too.
Regards, Harold Tickson from windows 7 mediafire download [rapidok.com]



Re: Tom Bearden on wireless transmission of energy and Blacklight Power (Score: 1)
by xela26 on Tuesday, November 16, 2010 @ 05:39:03 EST
(User Info | Send a Message)
Even if this article is old, its still very informative. I'm glad I stumble on this site. Thanks for putting this up in the net.

NJ solar grid [www.gather.com]



 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.