ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 102 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

The Reality of Future Energy Devices--Part 1
Posted on Sunday, August 07, 2005 @ 23:42:38 UTC by vlad

Devices Anonymous writes: I am often asked how I know that future energy devices are real. Evidence can take the form of scientific tests or witness testimony.

Let's first examine the competency of people who've told me about them. Here are a few cases in point:

* An internationally renowned aerospace consultant who often lectures for NASA. He told me that, while working in a "black" project, he personally witnessed an operating zero-point energy device.

* A Naval Research Laboratories (NRL) program manager who has repeatedly established net gain of calories in several lab experiments.

* Dr. Scott Chubb and his associates at NRL who have compiled 9+ cold fusion experiments producing significant repeatable "anomalous" results.

* A Ph.D research physicist whose boron cycle fusion reactor has achieved 1 billion degrees in lab tests--more than any tokamak experiment.

* A Boeing Principal engineer who designed the International Space Station windows. Upon hearing confidentially disclosed the properties of the recently discovered "trans-magnet" he declared "if this can't enable a free energy device I'll eat somebody'a hat."

* A Ph.D physicist from General Electric who has built an engine that burns water.

* A retired United pilot who befriended a former Vice President at Ford. The VP invented multiple high-mileage carburetors then sold them to oil companies. When asked why he didn't commercialize them, he replied "because I enjoy living." Of course, these have not seen the light of day.

Assuming there is serious interest in this, next time I'll go into more specifics on devices.

Jonathan Kolber


 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Devices
· News by vlad


Most read story about Devices:
Overunity magnet motor released !


Article Rating
Average Score: 4.8
Votes: 5


Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"The Reality of Future Energy Devices--Part 1" | Login/Create an Account | 6 comments | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: The Reality of Future Energy Devices--Part 1 (Score: 1)
by ElectroDynaCat on Monday, August 08, 2005 @ 07:28:37 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)
Merely having proved an overunity return on energy doesn't put you home free. There's an important condition attached to a truely useful FE/OU device that most innovators fail to appreciate.

To truely be successful, an FE/OU device must meet the requirement that it be self regenerating. In other words, part of the energy it generates must be fed back into the device to enable it to continue to run without outside excitation.

This is where most devices fail in performance testing, and most of the devices you have mentioned will probably fail in this respect also. Still I'm sure the ZPE.Com crowd would love to see further details.

Remember for a successfull close looped, self exciting FE/OU device, COP>1+(1/Ce).



Re: The Reality of Future Energy Devices--Part 1 (Score: 1)
by irjsi on Monday, August 08, 2005 @ 20:23:18 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)
Dear Mr. Kolber, Monday August 8, 2005

"Assuming there is serious interest in this, next time I'll go into more specifics on devices."

There is serious interest in these devices!
Go into more specifics on devices!
GET THE SHOW ON THE ROAD ! ! !

Contacts alluded to in your 'post' have networks of friends and confidants; those friends and confidants have families and friends.
Some, in these 'rippling circles' of contacts will be ecstatic to help fund implementation of any of these devices.
Some will be wiling to have them installed in their homes, businesses, vehicles.
Getting the devices into service is a good way to commence the 'cracking of the nut', an end run around the devout followers/power brokers of the status quo!
Create a 'chain reaction': 50, 500, 50,000, ad infinitum; just a few in each neighborhood all around the Globe.
Legions of mechanics/technicians must be trained in these new/old 'beyond physics' devices. It is beyond absurd to wait 20, 50 years for power brokers, etc. to make sure they hold all keys to our future!
We are already three decades (or a century+) in arrears for utilization of 'pollution free' energy sources.
Washington (energy bill 2005) funds the same horses and riders, with just enough 'crumbs' to alternative energy sources to warrant press releases.
Bet your children: Nukes, HotFusion and Oil folks have all but the crumbs. You can also bet that those guys are trying to vacuum up even those 'crumbs'!


to reiterate:
There is serious interest in this! These!
Go into more specifics on devices!
GET THE SHOW ON THE ROAD ! ! !

Get the devices into ACTUAL USE ! ! !
Get to training our youth in these technologies; , 30 million technicians/mechanics will be needed within a very brief span of time. WE CAN'T WAIT 20 YEARS!

Roy Stewart
Phoenix AZ
irjsiq@gmail.com

ps. If Nuclear power is so safe and clean; why aren't 'Supper Clubs' and Day Care Centers located in containment buildings ? ? ?






 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.