 |
There are currently, 364 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
| |
| |
Propellantless Propulsion G-Engine via Zero g-force WARP Drive - The Math
Posted on Wednesday, July 27, 2005 @ 22:52:39 UTC by vlad
|
|
Dr. Jack Sarfatti writes: Corrected expanded version - as word doc - much smaller file size. If the UFOs are OUT THERE this is essentially how they MUST work.
Everything Woodward and Puthoff are doing, even if it were to work in their own terms, would still not work as warp drive or star gate metric engineering. Any attempt to change inertial mass with Mach transients, or Higgs field is VERY DANGEROUS if it were to work because of the delicate balance fine-tuning in e/m.
This may even apply to my theory BTW. But since the effects are scale dependent it's probably OK to tweak at large scales without affecting small scales - barring nonlinear "turbulent" coupling of different scales. The scale issue is in the NEXT STEP. Ignoring it can be the DOOMSDAY DEVICE see Ch 11 of Sir Martin Rees "Our Final Hour". Metric engineering makes nuclear weapons look like exploding caps if one is not careful.
----------
http://www-conf.slac.stanford.edu/ssi/2005/lec_notes/Esposito-Farese/default.htm
happening right now - relevant to proposals by Puthoff, by Woodward, by Poltorak, by Yilmaz and by Shipov. Note that my theory is not only consistent with plain-vanilla 1915 GR but I DERIVE GR from QED and explain WHY Inflation, WHY dark energy/ matter, WHY Pioneer Anomaly et-al
----------
You can download Dr. Jack Sarfatti's mentioned doc "Progress in Emergent Gravity in 2005" from our Downloads/ZPE_related section. [Vlad]
|
| |
|
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
| |
Average Score: 4.75
Votes: 4
| |
|
| "Propellantless Propulsion G-Engine via Zero g-force WARP Drive - The Math" | Login/Create an Account | 8 comments | Search Discussion |
|
| | The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. |
|
|
|
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register |
|
Comment on Esposito slides (Score: 1)
by Rob (rob@zpenergy.com) on Wednesday, July 27, 2005 @ 23:09:44 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com | Image 5 shows that gravitation and acceleration affects timedilation. This is not entirely true, as by experiment, centripetal acceleration of muons on the order of 10^18 g has shown no effect on the lifetime of muons. Does timedilation not occur in rotating (and thus accelerating) frames?
|
|
|
Re: Propellantless Propulsion G-Engine via Zero g-force WARP Drive - The Math (Score: 1)
by pulsed_ignition on Thursday, July 28, 2005 @ 19:25:11 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://diamondlube.com | Gosh Jack, I wonder if the Warp Drive you speak of is anything like what I proposed to Mark Millis at NASA? Hello Mark!!!!! Someone high up at JPL (a Dr.) is supposed to be using the PLASMA that my device produces for propulsion - and I was told it was the #2 project at JPL. As I was told - "Dr. X is not using the mechanical energy that your device produces, he is using the plasma for propulsion." Imagine that? Maybe they were just trying to drive me over the edge in telling me this, but no such luck. If our Government would rather steal it than pay for it - this is nothing new. Thank GOD Clinton is not in charge anymore, or he would just give it to the Chinese.
ZPE is real and Pulsed Plasma can tap it - which is covered in my US patent.
Chris |
|
|
Testimony for Congressional Intelligence Committees (Score: 1)
by vlad on Thursday, July 28, 2005 @ 22:39:18 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com | On Jul 28, 2005, at 12:08 PM, Gary S.B. wrote:
> Hi Jack,
>
> I have been warning about the potential national security WMD
> issues coming from all of this breakthrough propulsion physics
> stuff for several years now. I suspect that it goes back at least
> into mid 80's with Hutchison, INSCOM and the SUN STREAK RV'ing
> material as well. Maybe even the Bearden-Einhorn material? Don't
> foget the strange Alpha business and DIA Murad.
>
> Gary
>
>
On Jul 28, 2005, at 12:31 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
> Memorandum for the Record
> Subject: Emerging Unconventional WMD Potential Threats
> To: USG Intelligence Community NDI MASINT, House & Senate
> Intelligence Committees et-al
> From: Jack Sarfatti, Ph.D. physicist UC Degree
>
> An intelligence source has just confirmed to me that he is
> testifying about this next week Tuesday. So it is already happening
> allegedly. This particular guy is not a physicist however and is a
> personal long-time friend of Hal Puthoff's so that what he can
> reliably say about the stuff below is non-existent. However, maybe
> they are asking him questions about other things?
>
> What can be reliably said however is that if any of the stuff we
> are debating below has any reality, then the weapons potential is
> greater than nuclear weapons. Puthoff and I agree about that. We
> differ only on the tactical path not the strategic goal.
>
> So I am "Leo Szilard" here, if not "Einstein" - at least "Leo". I
> see no "Einstein" on the horizon here other than myself however and
> as evidence I present Once More With Feeling (slightly expanded)
> for your perusal Ladies and Gentlemen:
>
> My Theory!
On Jul 28, 2005, at 9:50 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
> Let me explain something to all of you. All of this is US National
> Security and there is a factional struggle inside USG Intelligence
> Community over the kind of stuff Puthoff and to some extent
> Woodward are suggesting and my opposition to what they are
> suggesting. Indeed, there is now talk of a Congressional
> Intelligence Committee probe into what is really going on here. The
> sooner the better.
|
|
|
|
|
