ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 820 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events
  • (June 24, 2026 - June 28, 2026) 2026 ESTC CONFERENCE

  • Hot Links
    Aetherometry

    American Antigravity

    Closeminded Science

    EarthTech

    ECW E-Cat World

    Innoplaza

    Integrity Research Institute

    New Energy Movement

    New Energy Times

    Panacea-BOCAF

    RexResearch

    Science Hobbyist

    T. Bearden Mirror Site

    USPTO

    Want to Know

    Other Info-Sources
    NE News Sites
    AER_Network
    E-Cat World
    NexusNewsfeed ZPE
    NE Discussion Groups
    Energetic Forum
    EMediaPress
    Energy Science Forum
    Free_Energy FB Group
    The KeelyNet Blog
    OverUnity Research
    Sarfatti_Physics
    Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
    Vortex (old Interact)
    Magazine Sites
    Electrifying Times (FB)
    ExtraOrdinary Technology
    IE Magazine
    New Energy Times

    Interesting Links

    Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
    SciTech Daily Review
    NEXUS Magazine

    UNIVERSE IN CRISIS AS EXPERTS QUESTION BIG BANG MODEL, July 07
    Posted on Thursday, July 07, 2005 @ 22:14:53 UTC by vlad

    Science The widely accepted idea that the universe began with a Big Bang could be wrong, according to astrophysicists who took part in a "Crisis in cosmology" meeting in Portugal and reported in this month's Physics World magazine.


    Full story at http://www.physorg.com/news4999.html


     
    Login
    Nickname

    Password

    Security Code: Security Code
    Type Security Code

    Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

    Related Links
    · More about Science
    · News by vlad


    Most read story about Science:
    100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


    Article Rating
    Average Score: 4
    Votes: 1


    Please take a second and vote for this article:

    Excellent
    Very Good
    Good
    Regular
    Bad


    Options

     Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


    "UNIVERSE IN CRISIS AS EXPERTS QUESTION BIG BANG MODEL, July 07" | Login/Create an Account | 1 comment | Search Discussion
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

    No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

    Re: UNIVERSE IN CRISIS AS EXPERTS QUESTION BIG BANG MODEL, July 07 (Score: 1)
    by vlad on Friday, July 08, 2005 @ 22:04:01 UTC
    (User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com
    Dr. Jack Sarfatti writes: No, this meeting was mostly crank eccentric pseudo-physics behind the times IMHO. Most of the papers were obsolete not properly understanding the implication of the discovery of dark energy and dark matter as simply compact sources of zero point energy density of negative and positive pressure respectively when viewed from the outside. They did not wish to hear my view of their wrong ideas although Michael Ibison, to his credit, tried.

    For example, in the Newtonian spherically symmetric limit with a compact source M you have the static gravity potential energy per unit test particle mass

    V(Newton) = -GM/r

    The "gravity force" F in Newton's paradigm obeys Newton's 2nd law in a conservative potential field

    F/m = d^2r/dt^2 = -dV/dr

    Because r is in the denominator

    (d/dr)(1/r) = (d/dr)r^-1 = (-1)r^(-1-1) = -r^-2 = - 1/r^2

    Therefore we have a product of 3 - signs, so that the net radial force is inward, i.e. attractive.

    d^2r/dt^2 = -GM/r^2 in the inward radial direction.

    In contrast, suppose you are inside a uniform distribution of source positive mass with a positive uniform density rho. In that case, the interior effective mass is

    M(r) = (4pi/3)rhor^3

    There is the Newtonian limit theorem that the mass beyond the test particle's position r makes no net contribution.

    V = -(4pi/3)Grhor^3/r = -(4pi/3)Grhor^2

    F/m = -dV/dr = +(8pi/3)Grhor

    i.e. you only now have 2 - signs because the r dependence is now in the numerator. This force is a damped harmonic oscillator of imaginary resonant frequency f,

    i.e. d^2r/dt^2 - (8pi/3)Grhor = 0

    f^2 = -(8pi/3)Grho

    If, as logical consistency demands, you use the same sign conventions as for the case where you are outside a compact source, i.e. r > R = radius of the compact source. You can also see this by drawing the simple graphs of V and using the idea that the force is the negative gradient of the potential. You get a harmonic oscillator

    f^2 = +(8pi/3)Grho

    Note that you get the Newtonian equivalent of Alcubierre's zero g-force weightless warp drive AKA "geodesic glider" or "G-Engine" if you have a negative mass together with a positive mass e.g. a zero total mass "dipole". This was first noted by Hermann Bondi in Cornell lectures I attended over 40 years ago. It was written up by the late Robert Forward as "Negative Matter Propulsion". Bondi may have been at this Portugal meeting, but he is very old now and apparently has not kept up with the recent discoveries of the "concordance model" of "precision cosmology" starting in 1999 and really culminating ~ 2002. It was possible to question the chaotic inflation Big Bang prior to the discovery of Type Ia supernovae small anomalous frequency shifts
    (accelerating universe), but no longer.

    Given a negative mass-positive mass diple M = m - m = 0

    The negative mass repels the positive mass, but the positive mass attracts the negative mass. Therefore, in Newtonian terms there is an acceleration of the center of mass of the dipole, which is not possible if all mass were positive and also not possible with electrical charges. Using Einstein's geometrodynamics this translates into what is essentially Alcubierre's warp drive. Note that the negative mass causes a universal blue shift whilst the positive mass causes a universal red shift. Therefore, a flying saucer with "acceleration field" (Paul Hill) "G-Engine" (George Trimble) exotic propellantless propulsion shows a "reverse Doppler shift" as reported by former NIDS science director Bruce Cornet and implicit in the NIDS papers by Eric Davis and Jacques Vallee (e.g. the "novel" "Fastwalker" about "Alintel").

    Enter zero point energy:

    Newton's Poisson equation

    Grad^2V ~ 4piGrho

    for real matter is replaced by

    Grad^2 ~ c^2Λzpf

    for virtual "exotic matter". The latter is discussed by Kip Thorne et-al in his famous ~ 1986 "stargate" paper ("traversable wormhole"). See John Peacock's "Cosmological Physics" p. 26 for how Einstein's equivalence principle gives this result.

    Einstein's GR equation for "virtual matter" AKA "exotic vacuum" that limits to Newton's is

    Guv + Λzpfguv = 0

    The zero point stress-energy density tensor is

    tuv(zpf) = (c^4/8piG)Λzpfguv

    Where, for a certain kind of "alien" ET flying saucer

    Λzpf ~ (short wavelength cutoff)^-1(Anyon surface density)^1/2cos{Phase of Vacuum - Phase of Anyon}

    The idea for low-power metric engineering is to make Λzpf positive and negative in different parts of the thin shell fuselage using electric and magnetic near fields impressed on the control surface.

    e.g. the phase difference ~ 2pi(magnetic flux through a small loop)/(quantum of magnetic flux)



     

    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
    Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.