Search

Create an account	Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10

	Mission Statement Modules · Home · Forum · LATEST COMMENTS · Special Sections · SUPPORT ZPEnergy · Advertising · AvantGo · Books · Downloads · Events · Feedback · Link to us · Private Messages · Search · Stories Archive · Submit News · Surveys · Top 10 · Topics · Web Links · Your Account Who's Online There are currently, 116 guest(s) and 4 member(s) that are online. You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here Events Hot Links Aetherometry American Antigravity Bedini's Page Chava Energy Closeminded Science EarthTech Energy Science Energy21 Innoplaza Institute for New Energy Integrity Research Institute Interstellar Technologies JLN Labs KeelyNet New Energy Movement The Orion Proj. Panacea-BOCAF QVac_Eng RexResearch Science Hobbyist StarDrive Engineering Tom Bearden's Page USPTO Other Info-Sources NE News Sites AER_Network Alternative Energy News KeelyNet_News NextEnergyNews PESWiki/News NE Discussion Groups Energetic Forum Energy2000 Free_Energy Greenglow Hydrino JLNLabs KeelyNet MEG_builders NuEnergy OverUnity Sarfatti_Physics Sweet-VTA Tapten Tomorrow-energy Vortex Magazine Sites Distributed Energy Electrifying Times ExtraOrdinary Technology IE Magazine New Energy Times Interesting Links		New Energy Sources More Important than Conservation Posted on Wednesday, June 29, 2005 @ 21:52:49 PDT by vlad So say 66% in Rasmussen report Two-thirds (66%) of Americans say developing new energy sources is more important that conserving energy. A Rasmussen Reports survey found that just 27% take the opposite view and believe that conservation is more important. The survey also found that most Americans are optimistic about the possibility of alternative energy sources--72% believe it is somewhat or very likely that hydrogen-powered cars will be developed within the next 20 years. On the topic of nuclear power, 44% say it's "time for the United States to begin building nuclear power plants again." Thirty-five percent (35%) disagree. However, given a choice between "relying on oil imports from the Middle East or building new nuclear power plants," 59% said that nuclear power is the way to go. Just 17% would prefer reliance on oil imports to building nuclear power plants. ... Full article here: http://www.dakotavoice.com/200506/20050628_6.asp   Login Nickname Password Security Code: Type Security Code Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name. Related Links · More about Testimonials · News by vlad Most read story about Testimonials: Dr. Eugene Mallove is dead Article Rating Average Score: 4.66 Votes: 3 Please take a second and vote for this article: Options   Printer Friendly "New Energy Sources More Important than Conservation" | Login/Create an Account | 5 comments | Search Discussion The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register Re: New Energy Sources More Important than Conservation (Score: 1) by malc on Thursday, June 30, 2005 @ 03:16:40 PDT (User Info | Send a Message) http://web.ukonline.co.uk/mripley So for the next 20 years the US will do nothing about current emissions because of an assumed solution. Even if we stopped ALL emissions now there is still decades of warming in the system. Coupled with the hidden warming due to global dimming which is clearing. Some countries will be devastated by the changes in climate whereas others will survive albeit with some changes (like the US). But I wonder what the attitude of the US would be if the remote actions of a.n.other country destroyed its agriculture........ Then again if you own an oil company then none of this is actually happening! Re: New Energy Sources More Important than Conservation (Score: 1) by Doug on Thursday, June 30, 2005 @ 21:25:25 PDT (User Info | Send a Message) Someone needs to remind interested folk that Hydrogen is not a "power source", it is a storage medium for energy. Wishing for hydrogen fuel for cars ignores the obvious question - how will all this hydrogen be prepared? Several idiots from the oil industry have already suggested using "hydrocarbons" as the source! Doh! And using conventional (ie: not zpe which we cannot access, yet) means of splitting water means one needs truckloads of electricity. Generated by????? Re: New Energy Sources More Important than Conservation by malc on Friday, July 01, 2005 @ 00:09:22 PDT Re: New Energy Sources More Important than Conservation by nanotech on Friday, July 01, 2005 @ 06:37:10 PDT Re: New Energy Sources More Important than Conservation by Doug on Monday, July 04, 2005 @ 19:24:41 PDT

You can syndicate our news using the file backend.php All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2005 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice. Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.