 |
There are currently, 127 guest(s) and 5 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
| |
| |
The Future for Profit
Posted on Sunday, June 26, 2005 @ 12:19:02 PDT by vlad
|
|
Neil writes: As urgent as our energy availability problems are, and as much as we deserve to have those solutions made available to us; can we really afford to wait for governments or vested commercial interests to act on our behalf?... After all -- if we aren't intelligent and enterprising enough to be the activists of the free-enterprise system -- who is?... Who will take the needed initiatives and solve the tough problems if not us?
So, let's 'dumb-it-down' and simplify it a little for ourselves shall we? To take matters into our own hands as International Entrepreneurs the only Laws we need to well understand and avoid breaking are these:
- Resistance-to-change is absolutely inherent in human nature.
- Nowhere is that nature more powerfully present then in our buying habits.
- Knowledge of those basic Laws gives every person the power to change the world.
So then, if you have a good idea for a new product or service, you can start changing the world by changing the mind of the most powerful Buyer you'll ever know -- yourself. Survey yourself: When did you first see the opportunity or recognize the problem?... When did you decide to do something about it?... What did you do?
Think it through... work systematically... record the process... record the measured improvement... How much does it cost?... How much better off are you for having developed the solution?
Need a Research Lab?... start talking to other potential Buyers... Need to protect the technics of the product for awhile?... put it in a box... encapsulate it... nobody needs to know how you've solved their problem -- just that you have. Need a bigger Research Lab?... run an ad... take some photos... send some emails.
You see, the problems that you have in getting past the habitual inertias of human nature are in every respect identical to the problems that governments and big businesses face everyday. So what are you waiting for? Who's more qualified to spend your money -- you, or them?
Need some new ideas?... help getting started?... Contact us. Our initial advice is FREE and as long as you're sincerely moving forward, we'll stick with you until your business is up and going.
Sincerely,
Neil Roberts
C.E.O. BMA International
roberts@strato.net
www.bmaleaders.com
|
| |
|
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
| |
Average Score: 4
Votes: 3
| |
|
|
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register |
|
Money? (Score: 1)
by Kadamose on Monday, June 27, 2005 @ 09:20:02 PDT
(User Info | Send a Message) | I seriously can't believe that people are THIS stupid. There is NO profit in ZPE, because ZPE has NO supply or demand; it is an unlimited energy source. So, how does one expect to make profit on tapping into something that can never be depleted? Why would people go out and buy 'more' Zero Point Energy converters, when all they really need is one?
Come on, people, use your fucking heads. ZPE, as well as Nanotechnology, is going to completely annihilate the money system -- and we should all be saying GOOD RIDDANCE. Why isn't this the case? Why do we have people who are so fixated and obsessed with the ideals of the past? With this in mind, I am surprised that we even moved out of the caves. |
- Re: Money? by spacedrive on Monday, June 27, 2005 @ 17:38:47 PDT
|
|
Re: The Future for Profit (Score: 1)
by MrFluxGate on Monday, June 27, 2005 @ 09:35:52 PDT
(User Info | Send a Message) | Good advice...
Getting a new concept out of the inventors mind and on to paper the easy part.
Finding funds to produce a simple proto-type is more difficult. Most concepts still require basic research in components, since computer simulation is not excepted as total evidence the a concept works. You need three components: concept, research time and funding.
To make it work, you need all three, other wise the concept just sits still. All you can do is study the problem. Once a concept has been refined, it needs to be built and tested. We don’t have any programs like this in the USA today. This will be our down fall.
It’s almost impossible to find funding for new concepts, regardless of how good the idea looks. Investors want the working proto-type to test, meaning no risk! All the effort and risk is on the inventor. With a working proto-type, the inventor has no risk and can find all the funding he needs. A working proof of concept is worth millions and takes no effort to market.
Inventors need token funding (small amounts). They also need to be accountable for that funding. If investors find that the inventor can’t meet his objectives, its easy to terminate and limit losses. What is needed is a stepping stone or plan, which every one agrees too.
Investors should ask for a detailed plan as to how the inventor is going to bring his concept to reality. Start with a limited disclosure, if accepted, investors should provide small amounts of funding to confirm the physics. If this works out, then move to a small demo, with each step requiring a technical evaluation of the concept. Only green lights and meeting the objectives, would more funding be provided.
We must move new concepts from the mind of the inventor to reality. This is the only way to make progress and keep ahead of the competition. If we fail to link qualified inventors with qualified investors then our future will be very limited.
|
|
|
|
|
