ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 156 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events
  • (August 7, 2024 - August 11, 2024) 2024 ExtraOrdinary Technology Conference

  • Hot Links
    Aetherometry

    American Antigravity

    Closeminded Science

    EarthTech

    ECW E-Cat World

    Innoplaza

    Integrity Research Institute

    New Energy Movement

    New Energy Times

    Panacea-BOCAF

    RexResearch

    Science Hobbyist

    T. Bearden Mirror Site

    USPTO

    Want to Know

    Other Info-Sources
    NE News Sites
    AER_Network
    E-Cat World
    NexusNewsfeed ZPE
    NE Discussion Groups
    Energetic Forum
    EMediaPress
    Energy Science Forum
    Free_Energy FB Group
    The KeelyNet Blog
    OverUnity Research
    Sarfatti_Physics
    Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
    Vortex (old Interact)
    Magazine Sites
    Electrifying Times (FB)
    ExtraOrdinary Technology
    IE Magazine
    New Energy Times

    Interesting Links

    Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
    SciTech Daily Review
    NEXUS Magazine

    A status report on the Motionless Electromagnetic Generator
    Posted on Wednesday, June 08, 2005 @ 22:22:03 GMT by vlad

    Devices Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 12:11:01 -0500

    Dear Gary,

    The five inventors of the MEG are as frustrated as anyone else! We’ve sunk our money and enormous time in this effort for some 10 to 12 years. So we have our own money and sweat and work where our mouth is. It hasn’t been funded by selling stock to the naïve public etc.

    We are not out of engineering development of the MEG yet, and to get through it and into full production engineering would require about $10 to $12 million – money we personally do not have. So far, we’ve not obtained the necessary financing. We did sign one financial deal, only to have our last working demonstrator promptly destroyed by the new folks in three days, against all our instructions. So we had to legally declare that agreement null and void.

    Engineering the MEG, it should be clear, IS NOT JUST NORMAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING. We’ve made that point many times, and specified exactly how the machine works. Yet the biggest problem is that almost all of the venture capitalists are either EEs themselves, or employ as their second or third in command an EE, often with a Ph.D. in EE. And there the problem is that one cannot get across to the EEs that the MEG is not just a transformer, and that E-field radiations really do arise freely from the space just outside the core, re-radiating back into the core with a multitude of absorbed and reradiated signals of all sorts of phases. Unless this dense signal environment and its phasing is carefully adjusted so that the phases are generally additive, COP > 1.0 is not possible, obviously, since it means no effective NET energy input occurs from the activated external environment, even though LOTS of excess energy is being radiated back into the MEG. One doesn’t seek and cannot use just a “noise” energy input from that external environment! One must have some coherence, so that the external environment inputs some usable free EM energy.



    So to go from the business of slow, painful hand adjustment of the phasing to automatic optimization is certainly a “doable”, but it is not a simple EE problem. In aerospace, our team (who are all aerospace engineers with substantial and lengthy experience in nonlinear systems) has worked for several decades on such problems, and we do know how to solve it and finish the product so that it’s ready for full production engineering. Bluntly, electrical engineers do not know how to solve the problem and finish the unit, unless they’ve studied and worked well beyond electrical power engineering. The MEG’s operation cannot even be modeled in the standard CEM/EE model.



    But the EEs with venture capitalists (and some of our major national laboratories also, by the way) don’t seem to be able to comprehend something that is already well-known in aerospace, in chaotic systems work, and in dense signal environments work.



    Let me speak very plainly. That lack of understanding of such systems, and the use of a horribly fouled old electrical engineering model in our power engineering, is why nationally we have a horribly vulnerable centralized electrical power distribution and “control” system that violates almost every principle of multiloop servomechanism control theory in the book. It isn’t just an EE problem; it’s a multiloop servomechanism control problem. Our national centralized electrical power system is so fragile and so vulnerable that even a small portable EMP weapon (a “shooter”, as commonly known in the trade), really good hackers, and many other simple things can keep it surging out of control and collapsing indefinitely with ridiculous ease.



    If one wishes a more accurate grasp of the energy situation, see Matt Simmons’ presentations downloadable from the Simmons International website. There you get the truth, not political fiction, and by one of the firms that widely funds energy projects worldwide. Further, a single scalar interferometer can lay the entire system down at will, and keep it down forever. Since even the Japanese Yakuza have such interferometers and have been using them since early 1990 to engineer the weather over our heads (see Scott Stevens’ website for a meteorologist’s beautiful presentation of the resulting weather engineering phenomena), obviously somewhere along the line they are going to devote one of those interferometers to downing the entire U.S. electrical power system and keeping it down. And when that happens, there isn’t going to be any functioning centralized electric power in the U.S. from then on, period. Easy to surmise the catastrophic economic collapse that then will ensue, paralyzing and defeating the United States without a single missile, nuclear bomber, nuclear submarine, etc.



    Our fellows do know about scalar interferometers, weather engineering, and the works – but they keep it so closely locked up that most of our decision makers are not aware of it, even though Secretary of Defense Cohen was briefed on it and publicly confirmed such weapons in April 1997. Meanwhile, our present national power system and national energy policy are just a great disaster waiting to happen.



    We do continue in our search for the necessary funding, with a financial arrangement we can tolerate, and with a financial partner who can understand that he cannot just run in some good EEs and build a MEG and turn them out like pretzels. Or in fact that cannot be done with any other legitimate COP>1.0 system, without the proper completion of Engineering Development and then Production Engineering.



    We think we are again getting close to obtaining the necessary capitalization for the MEG, but will just have to wait and see how it turns out this time around.



    Best wishes,



    Tom Bearden

    Source: http://cheniere.org/correspondence/051605.htm

     
    Login
    Nickname

    Password

    Security Code: Security Code
    Type Security Code

    Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

    Related Links
    · More about Devices
    · News by vlad


    Most read story about Devices:
    Overunity magnet motor released !


    Article Rating
    Average Score: 3.44
    Votes: 9


    Please take a second and vote for this article:

    Excellent
    Very Good
    Good
    Regular
    Bad


    Options

     Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


    "A status report on the Motionless Electromagnetic Generator" | Login/Create an Account | 15 comments | Search Discussion
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

    No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

    Re: A status report on the Motionless Electromagnetic Generator (Score: 1)
    by vlad on Wednesday, June 08, 2005 @ 22:25:12 GMT
    (User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com
    Three new entries have been added to the Reference Section of the Tom Bearden Website.

    http://cheniere.org/references/index.html

    A description of the Electret by Tom, and two old newspaper articles, one describing the genesis of the Takahashi (magnetic Wankel) overunity motor, and the other an Associated Press article attempting an explanation about the spate of anomalous flashing radar rings - http://cheniere.org/satellite%20radar%20anomalies/radar%20maps/

    We also welcome further contributions to our very successful Book Sponsor for Students Program, whereby we donate free copies of ENERGY FROM THE VACUUM to qualified students.

    This program is self-screening, in that those with youthful, curious minds are rewarded.

    This is a very effective adjunct to hammering away at the "top down" approach, where public policy makers, necessarily an older demographic, are targeted for persuasion as to the necessity of replacing conventional power sources with free, inexhaustible supplies of energy from the vacuum.

    Regards

    Tony Craddock
    Web Administrator
    The Tom Bearden Website
    www.cheniere.org



    Re: A status report on the Motionless Electromagnetic Generator (Score: 1)
    by mach946 on Thursday, June 09, 2005 @ 07:27:51 GMT
    (User Info | Send a Message)
    Why is it that when these so called potential inventions are about to come on line they are always frought with some impossible hurdle. I dont believe there is any validity to this invention as with the others.
    Big companies like apple and microsoft and others started in garages, and made it. Why? because they produced something that was feasible and needed, thus overcomming any barriers from already established monopolizing corporations.
    If these free energy inventors really do have a device that works, then why dont they go to countries that have nothing to lose regarding established revenue from so called energy streams? Those countries would love to have an edge on the first world countries! It would enable them to manufacture goods with out having to factor in the energy cost into the final price, thus making them far more competitive. It would also give them the leap they need to improve the quality of living for their population, and the list goes on.
    Can it be that these inventors are not as resourceful as other pioneering individuals that have set up busineses? NO!I think they have other issues, that get in there way of putting up! therfore they should just shut up, until they have a viable product.
    Bottom line is this: We already know the world is in trouble energy wise, what we dont need is sad songs being added to these problems about what cant be done because of this or that. Free enrgy inventors should stick to sad song production, it seems to be more attainable than what they proclaim to be just about to deliver.



    Re: A status report on the Motionless Electromagnetic Generator (Score: 1)
    by Koen on Friday, June 10, 2005 @ 08:52:03 GMT
    (User Info | Send a Message) http://no.nl/tesla
    quote "We do continue in our search for the necessary funding, with a financial arrangement we can tolerate, and with a financial partner who can understand that he cannot just run in some good EEs and build a MEG and turn them out like pretzels. Or in fact that cannot be done with any other legitimate COP>1.0 system, without the proper completion of Engineering Development and then Production Engineering."


    Well, good EEs and PhDs demand a salary, so I suppose 12 million is necessary for salary? I think the MEG story is not true; Tom cannot show anyone the MEG has cop > 1 or inputs radiation (or other ambient) energy. If Tom could do that, he would not have a money problem, nor would he need 12 million for further development. A $100,000 would be sufficient in case the experimental MEG already shows COP>1.

    Secondly, the theoretical background provided by Tom is so far fetched, this (BA effect in previous years, and now: multiphase background radition etc...) cannot be linked to the special characteristics of the MEG. If Tom only could explain wy the MEG "coheres" the multiphase (multi frequency?) background radiation that resembles the ZeroPointField model of Haisch Rueda Ibison and Puthoff.


    Don't count on it, folks, the "MEG" does not function as claimed, it does not "cohere" anything, it does not make use of the AB effect, etc, etc, etc..



    Re: A status report on the Motionless Electromagnetic Generator (Score: 1)
    by Neil on Saturday, June 11, 2005 @ 11:51:22 GMT
    (User Info | Send a Message) http://www.bmaleaders.com
    To whom it may concern:

    I was at a loss as to how to connect with you, and I do not yet know who I am addressing.... how can you be of value to the scientific community when you are so anonymous to your readers? What are you afraid of?

    Be that as it may, I have both the resources and the motivation to help the struggling scientists and engineers that your site seems to be focusing on, but I need to somehow be able to communicate with the team's leading decision maker individually and directly.

    If you want a commission for having me do so -- fine -- just get me in contact with them.

    Tom Beardon in particular (developer of the Motionless Electromagnetic Generator) has a device that works and the consumer is ready to buy, but like most of his kind, keeps shooting himself in the foot by attracting people who really have absolutely no idea how to sell a product.... The people who burned up his working prototype are typical -- They just cant leave well-enough alone!

    Please, if you can't put me in contact with him (I looked at every link, on every site), than at least forward this email to him and ask him to contact me!

    As for your efforts, I think they're well-intended, but you need to offer these product developers more in the way of real, down-to-earth and practical help... and you really should find a way to make a decent profit -- what good are you to them if you can't stay in business?

    I volunteer!... I can SELL their products -- directly to consumers for CASH MONEY. All I need is a working prototype and some data sheets. I've personally been down this road a thousand times, and here's my performance-proven formula:

    STOP:

    - looking for peer recognition.
    - doing market surveys.
    - trying to get official certifications.
    - trying to attract venture capital.
    - paying lawyers for their opinions.
    - forming legal entities.
    - doing premature process engineering.
    - wasting money on admininistrative staff.
    - doing feasibility studies
    - trying to cover every contingency...

    ... and SELL THE THING!... I guarantee all the rest will fall into place like magic!

    Sincerely,
    Neil E. Roberts
    C.E.O. BMA International
    roberts@strato.net
    www.bmaleaders.com



    Re: A status report on the Motionless Electromagnetic Generator (Score: 1)
    by Thinman13 on Monday, June 27, 2005 @ 22:17:28 GMT
    (User Info | Send a Message)
    Tom, et al-

    In the upcoming issue of Nexus magazine will be an article I wrote, in part, about your MEG device. Also mentioned is the REMAT device (www.rematinc.com). I personally feel both your solid state device and the rotary REMAT device derive their energy from the same ZPE source.... though the REMAT designers make no claims to that regard. Best of luck to you in your long struggles to bring the MEG into production.

    JS



     

    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
    Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.