Ken Shoulders on extracting Space Energy
Posted on Wednesday, February 09, 2005 @ 21:44:07 GMT by vlad
|
|
Another interesting post from Jerry (Keelynet list): Hola Folks!
After a bit of consideration, thought I should post it to the list too as some might find it of use;
Hola Ken!
Thanks for the writeup, I posted your Energy email to the list at;
http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet/m16274.html
...clear and concise...now what was that technique or circuit to extract the energy???........
The note earlier about the pulsed plasma tube at;
http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet/m16272.html
not only referenced your patent but the inventor talks about EV cluster generation and its use.
Wish he had provided some measurements of input vs output. He claims electrostatic cooling which further enhances efficiency.
Norman, Bert and I think Joel did this with some toilet tissue, a butane torch and a neg ion generator...it was fascinating to our entire crowd back in Dallas. Set fire to a strip of tissue, it burned rapidly. Aimed the neg ion generator on it, tried to set it afire, no joy....
Years ago, some company in Israel came out with a backpack that put out a continuous jet blast of ionized air to be used in firefighting but I never heard or read anything else about it though I posted it on KeelyNet at the time.
What we need is an aether/zpe multimeter.......a way to detect the presence and the differences for some idea of measurement. From that point, it follows we can determine precisely what methods best affect the aether/zpe and learn to engineer it from that point on.
I think, since it naturally 'nulls' as you wrote in your email, the trick is creating the well to produce the difference of potential. You wrote it balances out and I think that is right on the money.
So we use energy to create the well to establish the flow, but how to sense that...other than as the size/depth of the well being the determinant for how much energy you could allow to flow through your loads?
I asked Dr. Clark (through his intermediary Warner) if he knew of any such device, he wrote back Dan Davidsons straw experiment. That is of course 'derived' and is very similar to Grebennikovs claims of carbonized straw dangling in a jar as well as a coned out roll of 135 film that he says emits a bean that will DRIVE a tiny load, etc...this is described with images at;
http://www.keelynet.com/greb/greb.htm
I have long thought high intensity, short duration pulses directly interact with the aether/zpe because of an inertial effect, much like Reynolds theories of dilatant space...where you press your foot on wet sand repeatedly and what was firm now becomes slushy and 'flows'....with the best article posted first as at;
http://www.keelynet.com/osborn/rey6.htm
http://www.keelynet.com/osborn/rey4.htm
http://www.keelynet.com/osborn/rey5.htm
Years ago in talking with Hal Puthoff I was describing my idea that inertia was like velcro....when at rest, the hooks are fully coupled and the mass was bound to space to produce the resistance to motion we call inertia.
As the mass velocity increases, the hooks become progressively more dislodged, resulting in a lessening of inertia (coupling to the space background) and at high velocities, the inertia is minimal.
As the mass velocity decreases, the hooks begin to reconnect, slowing the mass via the resumption of inertia and once again locking it into local space when 'at rest.'
He said he liked the idea and might use it one day if ok with me...sure, whatever gets us working devices......
I've long been looking for whatever could lead to some kind of device that would let us not only qualify but also QUANTIFY aether/zpe.
There must be an electronic effect/distortion, possibly with your EV clusters being shot onto a target like a CRT...not at an intensity that would damage or corrode the mechanism, just allow sensing of where it landed on a sensitized substrate/array that would give us an idea of velocity and ideally intensity.
Much like a magnetic or electrostatic field deflecting an electron beam in any TV...maybe the size of the 'splat' would be an indication of intensity.....
Additionally, there is Depalmas' claim of a time slowdown in the presence of massively rotating bodies which might be a means of detecting and measuring the intensity of aether/zpe as posted at;
http://depalma.pair.com/Absurdity/Absurdity05/SecretOfForceMachine.html
When a real mechanical object, a flywheel, is rotated, forces appear, the centripetal forces of rotation within the material of the flywheel.
These forces are the counterpoise to the spatial distortion created by the centripetal acceleration applied to the mass elements of the rotating wheel. Although these forces are not available for explicit measurement, their presence is evidenced when the wheel is rotated at a high enough speed such that the forces exceed the tensile strength of the flywheel material and an explosion results. The interesting phenomenon is that no work is required to maintain these forces at arbitrarily high values.
The gravitational field of the Earth is a spatial distortion occasioned by the presence of mass. The weight of an object is measured by a scale under a condition of constraint, i.e. no motion, and represents the degree of spatial distortion at the point of measurement.
(a brief of the actual experiment)
DePalma did an experiment with a 30-pound concrete disk spinning at 8,000 rpm, shielded by metal to prevent EM interference. Suspended over the disk he had an Accutron watch.
The Bulova specs say that the watch gains or loses about 1 second per year. When Bruce brought the watch near the disk, it lost 1 second in 20 minutes.
He repeated the experiment with an FM receiver, tuned to a station. When the radio was brought over the spinning concrete disk, the radio de-tuned.
----------------------
Meaning such rotating masses distort space-time in a measurable way and I won't even go into his spinning ball experiment or that of the Japanese who discovered a CCW rotation would reduce gravity or Don Kellys gravity drop experiments, etc..
Long have I believed Keely's premise that 'time is gravity' and it correlates with Einsteins UFT that all (gravity, electricity, magnetism, and inertia) are inter-related and thus can affect each other under the proper conditions.
Man, whoever comes up with something like an aether/zpe multimeter will open doors to so many totally new discoveries and branches of science because we can FINALLY measure this aether/zpe force and learn to use it.
One final comment, there is a guy named Pearson who years ago wrote some fascinating things reporting on an experiment I haven't been able to track, what I have is written up at;
http://www.keelynet.com/energy/pearson.htm
Here is the key point;
...with the vacuum underpinned by a compound medium of opposites we can call the 'ether', a whole new vista appears. Now energy CAN be created or destroyed - provided negative and positive energies change TOGETHER in EXACTLY balanced amounts! (can you say scalar???)
...At first this seemed to present a difficulty. Would not the two halves of ether MUTUALLY ANNIHILATE as primaries of opposite energy collided at high speed?
...it turned out that the need to conserve momentum prevented MUTUAL annihilation of energies from occurring during collisions. Indeed the two conservation laws of energy AND momentum, which had to be applied SIMULTANEOUSLY, led to a totally different result.
...Instead of annihilating, primaries INCREASED in number! In fact, 18% MORE of BOTH kinds appeared, on average, from EACH collision of opposites.
...When primaries collide by approaching one another from any other direction, so that their trajectories intersect at some ARBITRARY ANGLE, the analysis is only made slightly more complicated. Note it is necessary to consider RELATIVE velocities of approach. From such vantage points some collisions will also APPEAR to be HEAD-ON, so yielding THE SAME RESULT as the one previously described.
...However, for collisions NOT HEAD-ON, a sideway SCATTERING MOTION is imparted. And this applies equally to the general case just mentioned. Each primary GAINS extra momentum in this transverse direction, the positive one gaining positive momentum and the negative one gaining the negative variety. It follows that corresponding evaluation then yields the average gain ratio just quoted (18%).
However, the positive and negative gains of both momentum and energy could CANCEL under conditions of MULTIPLE COLLISIONS (noise). It therefore follows that everything that exists must ultimately have derived from the zero energy state of nothingness.
-----------------------
He claims up to 18% gain ratio (overunity) from such collisions.
Is this related to EV Grays 'splitting the positive'?? Though I thought that was more like a floating positive ground no one yet has duplicated Grays achievements so his theory hasn't been rediscovered.
Perhaps with plasma energies of opposite polarities, this could be proven and utilized?
It is apparently what the late Alexander Chernetski claimed to have achieved with a cycloid motion that apparently self-generates under intense magnetic fields in plasma;
http://www.keelynet.com/energy/plasmafe.htm
http://www.keelynet.com/energy/chernet1.htm
Guess thats enough, probably too much for one email....cuidado y orale pues! (take care and seeya!)
-----------------------------------------
Jerry Decker - KN wrote:
Hola Folks!
I sent Ken a note and he sent back the following to share with the list;
Energy by Ken Shoulders
I have slowly come to a view about the availability of energy that is now so firmly locked in my basic belief that I feel compelled to pass it on to others not having such a firm resolve.
With my presently held view, I see no problem whatsoever in easily extracting all of the energy mankind needs from our immediate environs.
It is not an involved problem at all except of the behavioral characteristics of man himself who seems more prone to moan about his plight and engage in the minutia of endless circles instead of pressing onward.
Consider the very evident and seemingly miraculous balanced state of charge we live in. There is almost exactly the same number of positive charges as there are negative ones in this and almost all directly observable nearby planets.
When one thinks of the gigantic numbers involved in achieving this balance, it does seem miraculous until you look at the simplest possible explanation.
It is a self-correcting system where all the extraneous charges are selectively cancelled by a very natural process. The result of this process is to produce a very peaceful state of existence but one putting us in an apparent energy null. The price for living in the energy doldrums is that we must scuttle about to whip up a few watts.
Although not as obvious as the electrical case, we might also be living in a condition of balanced gravity whereas all we are affected by is what is left over from another cosmic balancing act. Those special things or shapes that were not balanced would have been whisked away from here long ago and deposited elsewhere in the Universe.
Some theoretical considerations of fundamental gravity terms show the possibility of gravitational forces being plus and minus 40 orders of magnitude from where we presently sit.
That is a lot of pushing and pulling that could possibly be put to good use if we were to find and utilize a special shape or entity not subject to the time-derived rules of gravitational balance.
If you consider electronic charges, clustered in the form of an EVO, as an entity that can be deformed into a slightly new state of existence by the application of a small bias field applied to it, then the forces of gravity could possibly be utilized in such a way as to forcibly propel the structure in whichever way the bias field indicates.
This thrusting effect can be likened to space warping and pronounced to be a form of propulsion.
Existing in this energy-starved (by energy balancing) region of the Universe has just made us overly conscious of an apparent paucity of energy resources, when in fact; we are everywhere covered up by virtually free sources of energy.
All we have to do to recover vast resources of energy for our use is to warp space a tiny bit. This is just like squeezing a sweet orange to get its nectar. No squeezeno juice.
Clues into tweaking space via EVO biasing can be found at:
http://www.svn.net/krscfs/
-------------
Jerry Decker - http://www.keelynet.com
Public Archive http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet
Order out of Chaos - From an Art to a Science
|
| |
|
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
| |
Average Score: 5
Votes: 2
| |
|
